Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 2/22/2023 at 4:30 AM, Homewrecker007 said:

Best Decision I ever made. There is a slight mpg drop but not bad. Before the gear change, trucks were struggling to keep up with traffic pulling a trailer and constantly running at 5000 rpm. Swapped in the 3.73's now it will do 70-75 no problem 

 

I'm interested in the slight mpg drop: do you notice this across a tank (on average), around town, on the highway, towing, etc?  All else being equal, I'd expect to see a possible drop on the highway, but with a slight gain around town; the affect on the average being of course based on which driving environment the truck sees more.  Can you quantify what "slight" is?

 

As much as I would like 3.73s, I know I (most likely) won't be doing it due to my time (too many other projects) and that my truck is what we use predominately to run NY-OBX a few times a year, so I want to eek out whatever mileage I can.  In a few years, we'll be looking at today through rose-colored glasses, remembering the "days of cheap fuel, when we didn't really care about mileage."  I just like to see the numbers and data, especially on the gear ratio experiment.  My '04 FX4 had 3.73s, but also tires that were upsized one sidewall size, and I could feel the difference accelerating from a stop.  With only a 4 speed, the upsize was done not only for looks, but also to drop engine RPM on the highway a little, but I could feel it with a trailer.

  • Like 1
Posted
18 hours ago, 16LT4 said:

 

I'm interested in the slight mpg drop: do you notice this across a tank (on average), around town, on the highway, towing, etc?  All else being equal, I'd expect to see a possible drop on the highway, but with a slight gain around town; the affect on the average being of course based on which driving environment the truck sees more.  Can you quantify what "slight" is?

 

As much as I would like 3.73s, I know I (most likely) won't be doing it due to my time (too many other projects) and that my truck is what we use predominately to run NY-OBX a few times a year, so I want to eek out whatever mileage I can.  In a few years, we'll be looking at today through rose-colored glasses, remembering the "days of cheap fuel, when we didn't really care about mileage."  I just like to see the numbers and data, especially on the gear ratio experiment.  My '04 FX4 had 3.73s, but also tires that were upsized one sidewall size, and I could feel the difference accelerating from a stop.  With only a 4 speed, the upsize was done not only for looks, but also to drop engine RPM on the highway a little, but I could feel it with a trailer.

With a trailer on I get garbage mileage around 5-7mpg slower driving 55-60mph and pulling my 1929 model A I can get 10mpg. I also turned off the DOD and VVT that alone killed the mpgs, but I haven't had a single issue with engine or transmission in over 220,000 miles. I have the 5.3l and 6l80E with stock size tires also runninga pedal commander, it doesn't add power but it does make takeoffs and passing more aggressive which costs some fuel. I'm use to it so i easy in to the throttle, but when the wife drives the first few takeoffs she tries to launch us to the moon. Running empty driving sensible on mostly interstate I get 15 to 18 mpg back roads and hills, city or just plain foot in it all the time 12.5 to 14mpg 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Found some pull out 3.73 front diff and rear end for a reasonable price, any part numbers I should be looking for to confirm they’re 3.73s. Also found some 35x11.5r20s that are like 17 lbs lighter per tire than my 35x12.5r20 toyo m/t’s that should help. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Just for reference. My 2015 5.3 with a 6 speed is lifted on 37's and I went 4.56 gears front and back. Its perfect. I'm also tuned for premium with headers and full exhaust. I'm pretty certain if I had 35's I'd do 4.10s. My buddy who lowered his Silverado 5.3 and went with 22 inch rims and 32s or 33s did 4.10s and he loved it. 4.10s will have a bit more snap out of the hole but will rev a bit higher at highway speeds than 3.73s it all depends what you want. I can drive no problem at 70-80 mph. Gas mileage is a different story at those speeds though lol as my trucks a brick on the highway.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
On 2/12/2023 at 7:14 PM, XMR said:

18 Sierra sle with 5.3 think it’s 3.08 gears, 6” lift 35x12.5r20. First time buying a Gm truck and I’m starting to regret moving from ford. My 18 f150 with a 5.0 10speed and 35s had no issue towing or driving. This truck has issues doing even 70-75. I just deal with that but towing my canam defender is seriously depressing. Can barely do 65, 66-75 and it’s running 3k rpm and will not upshift what’s so ever, for an around 4500 load with the trailer that’s kind of ridiculous. I would like to be doing 75-80, but usually we run 2 sxs’s per truck which I won’t even attempt right now. I’ve had the truck since November, can’t go smaller on the tires. I actually use the truck off-road going to parks and getting around my buddies property where we keep the bikes. Should I even bother with spending the money on a regear or should I just bite the bullet and buy another truck? Other than the lack of power the truck seems to not mind the load. But I’m not trying to be limited to like 55 mph with two sxs’s on the trailer. Did I buy the wrong truck? Btw trucks in Texas, my local highway is 75 mph. I’ve thought about just buying and old diesel as a tow pig but I have enough stuff to work on, don’t feel like maintaining another vehicle. I would like to keep the truck, it’s nice to have a lighter 1/2 ton in the group. 

F3C05398-4B6E-46E8-8EB3-F7882DC6A188.jpeg

 

I have a 2014 Sierra 1500 crew 4x4 12.50x33" tires with 4.10 gears 5.3L and a 6 speed automatic.  I've flat towed my 4500lb Jeep from LA to Idaho at speeds up to 75mph for many hours at a time.  Not sure why your's seems handicapped.  You might have the engine checked.  But the gearing could be it.  The 35s and lift also detract from the highway performance.  The 3.08 gears are pretty far off the mark for 35s and a lift, let alone towing. 

Edited by Spurshot
  • Like 1
Posted

4.10s is probably the answer with 35s as these guys are saying. Did 4.56s and it's a little extra compromised on the highway.

Posted (edited)

I have the GU6 - REAR AXLE 3.42 RATIO and tuned the speedometer for the 35s.
It runs as well as when I had the stock tires.
No issues on the highways and, shh, I've had it over a hundred a time or two.

Edited by MikeBMW
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, MikeBMW said:

I have the GU6 - REAR AXLE 3.42 RATIO and tuned the speedometer for the 35s.
It runs as well as when I had the stock tires.
No issues on the highways and, shh, I've had it over a hundred a time or two.

Have you had any drive shaft issues or did you swap it out already?

Posted
14 hours ago, Homewrecker007 said:

Have you had any drive shaft issues or did you swap it out already?

Stock drive shaft - no issues whatsoever.

 

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 3/16/2023 at 12:50 AM, Homewrecker007 said:

Have you had any drive shaft issues or did you swap it out already?

 

Justin with Blackbear performance told me the stock driveshaft is good to 130ish.

 

I should say that 130ish is for the 8spds with 3.23 gearing.

Edited by M1ck3y
  • Like 3
  • 1 year later...
Posted

Honestly I'm baffled that gm would put out a "Z71" with 3.08 gears. Mine is a 2015 Z71 w/the G80 rear end. It came w/3.42's and I run 35'12.5 18's on a 3.5" lift and haven't had any issues. I don't tow a lot but when I do it never has an issue.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,519 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...