Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello!

 

since i cannot find info on this like its possible with Dodge and Ford, maybe someone here can help.

 

So with the older model lines, there was a big difference between the Pickup Frame and the Chassis cap frame.

 

The Pickups was fully boxed from 2011 on and hat a profile of around 8.4x3.4x0.18“ made out of 60k PSI steele, which was far ahead oft he competition at the time.

Did this change in any way?

 

The Chassis Cap apparently had a gigantic profile of 11x2.5x0.5!!! Now this one was obviously an open C, however i dont know if the entire frame was open c, like it is with the modern day 4-6500, or it was a mix of boxed front from the pickup version with an open C rear end, like Ford und Dodge are doing on their chassis caps. I also dont know i fit was a layered frame, but i’m pretty sure it was. PSI rating was only 36k.

 

Did this change in any way?

 

Kind regards

 

Marcus

Posted

Youre question is probably beyond the depth of what anyone other than a GM employee with access to the system can provide. Youre getting deep into engineering questions. Unless you pursued it through an upfitter program manual but even then there have been some rolling changes through the years. 

All I can say is that the chassis cab frames do vary quite a bit from the pickups, especially in length and crossmember configurations (fuel tank(s) )

Posted (edited)

First, they are chassis cab, not chassis cap. (as in cab and chassis)

 

GM has all new HD pickup frames for 2020 model year onward.

Previous HD frame change was the 2011 model year. 

 

GM makes frame information available for upfitters that buy both pickup and chassis cabs (of varying frame length).

Not sure if the upfitter info is what you are looking for, but there are many pages to wade thru. 

There should be load rating information there.

 

 

 

Edited by redwngr
Posted
5 hours ago, Hendrickson360 said:

Hello!

 

since i cannot find info on this like its possible with Dodge and Ford, maybe someone here can help.

 

So with the older model lines, there was a big difference between the Pickup Frame and the Chassis cap frame.

 

The Pickups was fully boxed from 2011 on and hat a profile of around 8.4x3.4x0.18“ made out of 60k PSI steele, which was far ahead oft he competition at the time.

Did this change in any way?

 

The Chassis Cap apparently had a gigantic profile of 11x2.5x0.5!!! Now this one was obviously an open C, however i dont know if the entire frame was open c, like it is with the modern day 4-6500, or it was a mix of boxed front from the pickup version with an open C rear end, like Ford und Dodge are doing on their chassis caps. I also dont know i fit was a layered frame, but i’m pretty sure it was. PSI rating was only 36k.

 

Did this change in any way?

 

Kind regards

 

Marcus

 

 

A pickup frame is different from the Chassis Cab frame, yes.  

 

If you went in and ordered a WT or LT Dually with a box delete, its going to have the regular boxed frame that they use.

 

If you ordered a WT or LT Chassis Cab, its going to have the c channel big rails from about the cab back to past the rear axle.  The straight "upfitter" style frame with   Front end to about under the driver's seat is boxed frame from the pickup frame.  

 

Here is the specs for the 3500 pickups - https://www.gmfleetorderguide.com/NASApp/domestic/printbook?pdftype=option&lang=1&vehicle=22467&rpoid=36178

 

Can't find the chassis cab one but its going to be different past the cab for sure.  I think the frame also has the industry standard NTEA 34 inches rail to rail spacing.  

Posted

Hello,

 

thank you very much for this document (and thx to the rest to for the info!)

 

So interestingly enough, both the dimensions and steel quality did not change since 2022, but well, it was best in class since then. The 2017+ Ford Frame has even more height (or depth by those documents) but "only" 50k PSI steel, so similiar nowadays.

 

What i wonder: Since the C-channel frame of the Chassis cab is so much larger (or used to be) how are they put together? And are they still of diffeent steel quality? Seems kinda weird. Ford upped they steel with the Cchassis Caps to 50.000k too, but the dimensions are much smaller.

 

Or maybe the boxed front end of the GM is also different from the first half of a pickup frame in the first place...

Posted
8 hours ago, Hendrickson360 said:

Hello,

 

Since there is no data for the 3500 chassis caps, maybe there is something for the 4500 one? I guess the frame would be the same for 4-6500?

 

Kind regards

 

Marcus

 

 

4500-6500 Silverado are a completely different truck/frame.  They are joint venture built and designed with International Navistar.  I/N builds the frames and does all the chassis work, GM supplies the cabs which are old K2XX cabs and interiors, the headlights (from 14-15 1500 Silverado) and they did the design work for the hood.  GM/DMAX does the L5D Duramax for it, Allison supplies transmissions.  Built a lot like the old 03-09 Topkick/Kodiak trucks.  

 

Here's a snapshot of the 4500-6500 frame specs from the GM Upfitter body builder chassis manual: CV_BB.book (gmupfitter.com)

 

 

rbm.thumb.png.656a5d2304424a027f23f40947101976.png

 

 

 

 

Posted

Hello and thank you again! What is really weird: I checked an old Terrastar-Doc of mine and apparently the frame was pretty much the same, but they did for some reason a downgrade in terms of PSI rating!

 

Now of course i would be really curious about that chassis cap frame, if it kinda sits between them and how the boxed front end and open c rear are connectet...

 

 

Navistar-frame.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 686 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...