Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My 2019 LTZ 5.3 with 55k started running 215f. Maybe 212. Seems like over the last month the stat is holding closed about 5 degrees more. Not huge but noticed the fan which used never come on now does after a brief heat soak. Again not huge but figured I’d just replace the stat. This series is a WAY bigger pain than previous models. Looks like the stat is in the lower hose connection which is going to take twice the work.

 

Thoughts???

Posted
7 hours ago, DHBWA said:

My 2019 LTZ 5.3 with 55k started running 215f. Maybe 212. Seems like over the last month the stat is holding closed about 5 degrees more. Not huge but noticed the fan which used never come on now does after a brief heat soak. Again not huge but figured I’d just replace the stat. This series is a WAY bigger pain than previous models. Looks like the stat is in the lower hose connection which is going to take twice the work.

 

Thoughts???

 

Nothing unusual going on here. A 'brief' hot soak drives heat into the water which must pass through the thermostat and past the sending unit. It spikes. Spikes high enough on a hot day and the fans turn on. Fans will also turn on when the AC is on under certain conditions. Will even stay on in stop and go with AC on. I actually use this to my advantage on such days. Did so today in an Interstate construction zone I got caught up in. With the AC off water might reach 220 F. With it on it never gets past 190 F. 

 

Your thermostat on the 5.3 is in the same place it has been since these motors were introduced in 2014. Top hose, motor side of that hose. 

Posted (edited)

Only unusualality is the change….

 

I need to look again but I saw no housing where the upper hose entered the intake. Thanks GB

Edited by DHBWA
Posted (edited)

 I must be missing something…Mine isn’t like that or I need to climb up and check better 

IMG_0354.jpeg

IMG_0355.jpeg

IMG_0354.jpeg

IMG_0355.jpeg

Edited by DHBWA
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Ah the water pump changed with the new body style.

 

The thermostat is on the lower left side then.

 

57_be53cc87-b27d-418b-a7c7-edde54b7a1ea_

 

 

Edited by CamGTP
  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

How did you remove the shutters?  Just bow them and pull out?  I have to question how much they improve gas mileage and how much they increase temps in engine and transmission.  

Posted
13 hours ago, typhoon186 said:

I have to question how much they improve gas mileage and how much they increase temps in engine and transmission.  

 

Aero packages are a compilation of many things, not just one. By themselves, little, but as part of the package they are pennies that make the dollar. 

 

They don't raise the temperature. They shorten the time it takes to reach temperature. 

  • Like 1
Posted
18 hours ago, typhoon186 said:

How did you remove the shutters?  Just bow them and pull out?  I have to question how much they improve gas mileage and how much they increase temps in engine and transmission.  

Check this video out and read down his comments and he give a review on how it worked for him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5hnFhd1tss

 

Posted

Yes, in that picture but the thermostat is in the same place on the V8 truck with the L83 and L86.

Posted
On 10/24/2023 at 11:12 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Aero packages are a compilation of many things, not just one. By themselves, little, but as part of the package they are pennies that make the dollar. 

 

They don't raise the temperature. They shorten the time it takes to reach temperature. 

I don't buy they don't raise the temp but only shorten the time it takes to reach temp.   The thermostat controls the time to reach temp.  No water flowing the the radiator until the temp is achieved so the shutters have no affect on that.  And from what I tell, they don't open at highway speeds after the temp is reached.   Their sole purpose is the improve aerodynamics.  How much is not known.  Do they increase engine temps?   I can't say.    But is seems likely.   

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,030 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...