Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Thank you lord for having glass coverage on our insurance policy.  0 deductible too.  Final cost was 1143 bucks....holy crap!!  I thought it cracked from body flex due to the beating we took on our last big adventure towing our camper 3300 miles to Maine.  Nope, it started from what looked like a BB sized small hit then cracked to the top of the windshield then ran south below the rear view mirror.  I'm thinking it was one of those damn black flies up there in Maine that like to wear helmets.  Bitey hard headed little bastards...lol....

Edited by Jettech1
  • Haha 3
Posted
19 hours ago, Jettech1 said:

Thank you lord for having glass coverage on our insurance policy.  0 deductible too.  Final cost was 1143 bucks....holy crap!!  I thought it cracked from body flex due to the beating we took on our last big adventure towing our camper 3300 miles to Maine.  Nope, it started from what looked like a BB sized small hit then cracked to the top of the windshield then ran south below the rear view mirror.  I'm thinking it was one of those damn black flies up there in Maine that like to wear helmets.  Bitey hard headed little bastards...lol....

You should have just slathered your crack with silicone like we all slathered our tailgate holes. Probably used half a tube for the holes and half for the windshield haha

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Pryme said:

You should have just slathered your crack with silicone like we all slathered our tailgate holes. Probably used half a tube for the holes and half for the windshield haha

No and I still haven't slathered my tailgate holes either....lol...Although I probably will plug them, the thought of that tailgate banging off the front jack on our camper has been a thought of mine.  That would totally suck...especially if we were cruising down the highway making turns and had no idea the tailgate was open.  Or would we????  Would I get a message that the tailgate is open?  

Edited by Jettech1
Posted
1 hour ago, Jettech1 said:

No and I still haven't slathered my tailgate holes either....lol...Although I probably will plug them, the thought of that tailgate banging off the front jack on our camper has been a thought of mine.  That would totally suck...especially if we were cruising down the highway making turns and had no idea the tailgate was open.  Or would we????  Would I get a message that the tailgate is open?  

I would recommend just throwing the truck in reverse on occasion going down the freeway. You will then see the view and know if the gate is down

  • Haha 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, Pryme said:

I would recommend just throwing the truck in reverse on occasion going down the freeway. You will then see the view and know if the gate is down

Great advice...lol...I hope no one else takes you seriously....remember your audience buddy....LMAO!!!!

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

You must have gotten a deal! Mine was $1400 for a factory replacement. Luckily I have a $0 deductible. (Do you have the lane departure assistance, or w/e it's called? That might explain the price difference.)

To add insult to injury, that was a month ago. Yesterday a friggin boulder slammed my windshield and I have to make another claim. The old claim is still open... LOL!

I feel that my 1st windshield was inferior. But the hit yesterday would have cracked bulletproof glass! So I can't comment on the strength of that windshield. Maybe 3rd times the charm...

Edited by Dr1ft3r
  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Mine’s cracked too, ‘bout to put in a Safelite claim too. Last time it took ‘em 3 weeks to get it done. But it’s okay..

 

Hey newdude, will these trucks stop you from shifting into R on the highway?

Yes, all modern vehicles have a lock out disallowing them from going into reverse or park. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
20 hours ago, Dr1ft3r said:

You must have gotten a deal! Mine was $1400 for a factory replacement. Luckily I have a $0 deductible. (Do you have the lane departure assistance, or w/e it's called? That might explain the price difference.)

To add insult to injury, that was a month ago. Yesterday a friggin boulder slammed my windshield and I have to make another claim. The old claim is still open... LOL!

I feel that my 1st windshield was inferior. But the hit yesterday would have cracked bulletproof glass! So I can't comment on the strength of that windshield. Maybe 3rd times the charm...

Let me try to catch up here.  That was the price on the sheet from safelite..  I've had numerous windshields replaced over the years...safelite was alway my go to.

Posted
18 hours ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Mine’s cracked too, ‘bout to put in a Safelite claim too. Last time it took ‘em 3 weeks to get it done. But it’s okay..

 

Hey newdude, will these trucks stop you from shifting into R on the highway?

They were ready before we were.  And we live in Atlanta to where everything is delayed.  Please never shift into reverse while going down the highway......damn you @Pryme lol

  • Haha 2
Posted
On 9/2/2023 at 5:51 PM, Jettech1 said:

Let me try to catch up here.  That was the price on the sheet from safelite..  I've had numerous windshields replaced over the years...safelite was alway my go to.

 

I've always used Safelite too. My sheet quoted $1,400 for OEM replacement. I paid $0, but that's the most expensive windshield replacement I've ever had. Since your sheet quoted a lot less I was wondering if it was the same windshield. I have the Lane Departure Warning System which required the tech to connect his computer to the vehicle and I also have the HUD. I don't know if those options would be the reason for the difference in price of the windshield between us.

Location could be another factor. I'm out here in the boonies of the Rocky Mountains. I contract all over the country and the fast food here is even more expensive than a lot of places. It takes a week+ for the local dealer to get my windshield shipped in.

  • Like 1
Posted
18 hours ago, Dr1ft3r said:

 

I've always used Safelite too. My sheet quoted $1,400 for OEM replacement. I paid $0, but that's the most expensive windshield replacement I've ever had. Since your sheet quoted a lot less I was wondering if it was the same windshield. I have the Lane Departure Warning System which required the tech to connect his computer to the vehicle and I also have the HUD. I don't know if those options would be the reason for the difference in price of the windshield between us.

Location could be another factor. I'm out here in the boonies of the Rocky Mountains. I contract all over the country and the fast food here is even more expensive than a lot of places. It takes a week+ for the local dealer to get my windshield shipped in.

Your options might be the reason, I only have collision avoidance on mine.  The tech told me he had to recalibrate my system and that took him 2 hours to do.  So maybe that's part of it, could be more regional too if you're in the Rockies.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...