Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 2/19/2024 at 7:13 PM, SinisterSS said:

The 2024 active exhaust pretty much eliminates the need to purchase an aftermarket system.  Whisper quiet or loud at the twist of the dash switch from Normal to Sport.

Agreed!  I cannot imagine a reason/need to replace the new active exhaust - it really does deliver vastly different sounds with the twist of the knob.  I do think when the engine is cold and it's set to Sport mode the startup is a little obnoxious.......but thats only my perspective. 

  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 2/29/2024 at 6:21 AM, DoubleDD said:

There’s something that AWE exhaust gives you when you install there exhaust system that eliminates all issues and lights from coming on after the install. Thank you!  

had a borla touring on 2019 sierra with 6.2. startup is nearly the same as active exhaust on new 24 6.2.  road driving/inside noise is less with the active exhaust vs the borla touring.

  • Thanks 1
  • 5 months later...
Posted

Hello Everyone, Warm Greetings from the Sandpit,

just bought my 2024 Yukon Denali and to be honest I am really upset that it didn't come with the active exhaust, apparently the GM Motors Middle East doesnt want to do that so it doesnt effect the choice for buyers to go to Cadillac. So weird stuff we have here. But anyways would anyone please know if the active exhaust could have a part number and how can it be installed. I have asked the dealer but it's been 1 month with no reply. Weird service but still ok.

I really felt bad when the guy next to me receiving his truck had a better sound than the Yukon. Thanks

 

Posted

Holy sh*t this active exhaust sounds great on my 25 Trail Boss! I am going to just leave it in Sport Mode. No cutting out the muffler or flapper valve. No need to install a better muffler. I am really impressed how much power the 6.2 has compared to the 5.3s I have owned in the past. Night and day difference.

Posted
4 hours ago, Bikerjon said:

Holy sh*t this active exhaust sounds great on my 25 Trail Boss! I am going to just leave it in Sport Mode. No cutting out the muffler or flapper valve. No need to install a better muffler. I am really impressed how much power the 6.2 has compared to the 5.3s I have owned in the past. Night and day difference.

 

Jon, When did you get the 2025 TB?  Oh yea, 6.2 rules!!

Posted
4 hours ago, Steve-2019 said:

 

Jon, When did you get the 2025 TB?  Oh yea, 6.2 rules!!

Hello Steve. Got it last Tuesday.

20250111_145523[1].jpg

20250111_145552[1].jpg

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,668 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...