Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It depends on the tire option as to the top speed cutoff. 2024 the active exhaust is optional. Saw several on the local GMC lot with it as an additional $395 option on the sticker the other night.

Posted (edited)

NPP active exhaust is available on SLT, AT4, AT4X and Denali, and is standard on Denali Ulitmate.  6.2 engine only.  You will have to look at your build sheet or the window sticker for the option.  

 

Speed limiter will vary.  Wheel/tire combo and more importantly the speed rating on the tire will dictate.  Should be 98mph, 106mph or 112mph.  A trip to "roads in Mexico" will help you find out what it stops at.    

Edited by newdude
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

My 2023 denali speed limit kicks in at 106 mph.  That's only 1/4 throttle!.  My factory tires ( bridgestone alenza a/s 02, size   275/50-22) were rated at 118 mph or 130 mph.   Not sure which.  So why is my speed limit so low?  Now I'm on a mission to raise/delete this crazy speed limiter.   If I have to pay the stupid $ to unlock the ecm and buy hptuners credits then I guess that's what I will end up doing.  This is BS.!

Posted
2 hours ago, typhoon186 said:

My 2023 denali speed limit kicks in at 106 mph.  That's only 1/4 throttle!.  My factory tires ( bridgestone alenza a/s 02, size   275/50-22) were rated at 118 mph or 130 mph.   Not sure which.  So why is my speed limit so low?  Now I'm on a mission to raise/delete this crazy speed limiter.   If I have to pay the stupid $ to unlock the ecm and buy hptuners credits then I guess that's what I will end up doing.  This is BS.!

This topic pops up from time to time. Seems it’s not just tires the drive shaft comes into play. 

Posted

Exactly, the driveshaft is the main reason why. Once it hit critical speed, bad things will happen.

 

Lots of cool youtube video's of stock trucks from different era's having the driveshaft explode on the dyno at over 100mph.

Posted (edited)

Interesting:   Maybe I was just lucky in my 2014 that was tuned and the limits removed.  I ran it over 130+ mph many times and most all of my previous trucks.   I'm sure it's a rare problem on a modern truck on the highway.  I can see the risk increasing on a dyno or drag strip under a big load.  However, I'm very surprised and skeptical that GM would allow a truck to be produced with such a design limitation when it can easily be designed out from the start.  I can understand a limit based on the tires design since they have no control over that, but not a driveshaft that can be designed well beyond the speed the vehicle can achieve.  And I'm sure there is a huge safety factor built into their design limits as well.    I guess the drive shaft length on a truck vs. a car is the issue but still it could be designed to handle the higher speeds.   Maybe a good idea to add a drive shaft loop if I'm going to raise or remove the speed limit in the future just in case.   

 

Here's a good article about drive shaft failures:

https://www.onallcylinders.com/2015/09/18/ask-away-with-jeff-smith-examining-common-causes-of-driveshaft-failure/

 

 

https://gmauthority.com/blog/2020/11/chevy-silverado-gmc-sierra-recalled-over-driveshaft-separation-problem/

 

 

 

Edited by typhoon186
Posted
1 hour ago, typhoon186 said:

Interesting:   Maybe I was just lucky in my 2014 that was tuned and the limits removed.  I ran it over 130+ mph many times and most all of my previous trucks.   I'm sure it's a rare problem on a modern truck on the highway.  I can see the risk increasing on a dyno or drag strip under a big load.  However, I'm very surprised and skeptical that GM would allow a truck to be produced with such a design limitation when it can easily be designed out from the start.  I can understand a limit based on the tires design since they have no control over that, but not a driveshaft that can be designed well beyond the speed the vehicle can achieve.  And I'm sure there is a huge safety factor built into their design limits as well.    I guess the drive shaft length on a truck vs. a car is the issue but still it could be designed to handle the higher speeds.   Maybe a good idea to add a drive shaft loop if I'm going to raise or remove the speed limit in the future just in case.   

 

Here's a good article about drive shaft failures:

https://www.onallcylinders.com/2015/09/18/ask-away-with-jeff-smith-examining-common-causes-of-driveshaft-failure/

 

 

https://gmauthority.com/blog/2020/11/chevy-silverado-gmc-sierra-recalled-over-driveshaft-separation-problem/

 

 

 

I was surprised myself. I tuned all my trucks. Living in Texas there’s several roads I travel that I stretch the legs of my vehicles. We have roads that are 75 miles per hour that are two lanes. Passing a tractor trailer you can easily exceed 100 miles per hour. I passed with my foot buried. Some of the passing lanes are short you really have to get after it. I’m older and retired I’m not in a hurry anymore my vehicles are older. So rarely get after it. My working traveling days, it was every day. So yeah the drive shaft thing was a surprise.

Posted

PCM of NC is a very experienced and reputable tuner.  They will not dyno tune trucks for drive shaft concerns but do road tuning and have no problem winding it out speed wise on the road.  Just won't do it on their dyno.  

Posted
14 hours ago, typhoon186 said:

My 2023 denali speed limit kicks in at 106 mph.  That's only 1/4 throttle!.  My factory tires ( bridgestone alenza a/s 02, size   275/50-22) were rated at 118 mph or 130 mph.   Not sure which.  So why is my speed limit so low?  Now I'm on a mission to raise/delete this crazy speed limiter.   If I have to pay the stupid $ to unlock the ecm and buy hptuners credits then I guess that's what I will end up doing.  This is BS.!

Get a Pulsar LT and you can manipulate top speed, tire sizes for speedo correction, auto start stop delete, DFM delete etc , well worth the $$ considering all you get and easily installed or removed.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Naughty Donkey Performance said:

Get a Pulsar LT and you can manipulate top speed, tire sizes for speedo correction, auto start stop delete, DFM delete etc , well worth the $$ considering all you get and easily installed or removed.

 

Not available for the refresh Silverado 1500 2022 1/2 and up. I just checked.

 

Still waiting...............

Posted

They said they are working on it but to time frame as of yet.  Follow them on crackbook for the latest updates and product information.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,664 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...