Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

94 Silverado 350

 

When I apply the brakes, the rpms drop. In park or neutral the drop is approx 150 rpms and in reverse or drive approx 250 rpms. When I release the brake, the rpms go back up to normal.

 

I installed a new booster (rebuilt) last august 2025. Didn't have any problems until a couple of weeks ago. When I was working on the throttle body issues last month, I noticed some leaking around the booster vacuum line, so I replaced it. I have gone back and re-tightened the hose clamps and don't hear or see and leaks. 

 

I don't think the booster itself is leaking internally. The brake feels like normal and it stops ok. The pedal doesn't go to the floor, and I don't hear any hissing. When the truck is off, I still have pressure, so I guess the check valve is, ok?

 

I do question the rubber check valve grommet. Maybe its leaking around it? The replacement hose was just a section of new hose.  I plan to check it some more and test the check valve.

 

When I rebuilt the throttle body, I did replace the idle air control valve with another one I had. It was almost new, so I don't think that is a problem. 

 

Any other ideas or test suggestions.

 

Thanks

 

 

Posted

maybe just plug the vacuum line to the booster, to rule out that path as being the cause of the rpm change?

Posted

I can do that.  When I pull the check valve off, I will plug the line going to the intake.

Posted

I did plug the vacuum line and the rpms where ok.  I also tighten the booster line going into the intake. It was a bit loose and that didn't make a difference.

 

 

Posted
On 6/13/2026 at 4:30 PM, dji1 said:

I did plug the vacuum line and the rpms where ok.  I also tighten the booster line going into the intake. It was a bit loose and that didn't make a difference.

The booster probably failed internally. (Applying the brakes is basically creating a vacuum leak.)

Posted

I think you are right the brake booster must be leaking internally. I have tried everything else. Yesterday I replaced the check valve thinking it maybe wasn't closing all the way. Didn't really believe it since the booster held vacuum when the truck was off.  I even bought an original gm check valve from Rockauto. 

 

That booster isn't even a year old. O'Reilly's lifetime warranty. 

 

I am not looking forward to removing/installing that brake pedal clip again.

 

Good news is that my truck is running great after the throttle body re-built issues.

 

Thanks for the support.

 

Posted
9 hours ago, dji1 said:

I am not looking forward to removing/installing that brake pedal clip again.

Everything's always easier the second time!

Posted

It took me less than 5 minutes to remove the brake pedal clip. It is easier when you know how to do something.

 

Waiting on the replacement booster. Hopefully it will arrive sometime today. 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2000 Silverado 1500 LS, whenever I put it into reverse and also in drive it clunks, the truck also feels sluggish when driving. Any advice/ideas ?
    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...