Jump to content

Cab retaining water, common problem areas?

baglie1
 Share

Recommended Posts

baglie1 Enthusiast

baglie1

Posted
Posted

I have a 2012 GMC Sierra 1500 Crew Cab 4WD and a few severe storms recently passed through with very heavy rainfall and winds. Now, when I drive, I heard fluid/water sloshing around!!! The bed is dry :-(. Are the 3rd Brake Lights an issue with these trucks? I've only had the vehicle for a few months and have barely driven, so I'm still not that familiar lol. In my mind the obvious are the rear windshield and the 3rd brake light gasket...

richard wysong Senior Enthusiast

richard wysong

Posted
Posted

You are probably hearing water in the doors, make sure the drain holes are clear

  • 5 weeks later...
nitrozamboni New Member

nitrozamboni

Posted
Posted

It’s probably water in the doors. Mine had tape over the drain holes! Poked them open and that took care of it. Now I’m waiting for the rust to come through!🤬

Z45 Senior Enthusiast

Z45

Posted
Posted

Dirt settles in the door drain holes and traps water....lower corners of inside door skin.  

Homer1959 Enthusiast

Homer1959

Posted
Posted
On 6/12/2026 at 8:51 PM, baglie1 said:

I have a 2012 GMC Sierra 1500 Crew Cab 4WD and a few severe storms recently passed through with very heavy rainfall and winds. Now, when I drive, I heard fluid/water sloshing around!!! The bed is dry :-(. Are the 3rd Brake Lights an issue with these trucks? I've only had the vehicle for a few months and have barely driven, so I'm still not that familiar lol. In my mind the obvious are the rear windshield and the 3rd brake light gasket...

Thanks for not getting back to share your findings...  🙄

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Hit mid 90's today. Even at the boarder of Canada and up by Duluth it was in the 90's. Going to be like this all week. Sure it's nothing like the south seeing 100's but they do say it's a different kind of heat here with all the lakes/water and humid days.
    • CamGTP
      TCM Tuning 6L80E

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Pill flip on the transmission cooler lines is a 100% must do thing too.
    • ManyCamaroz
      “Service Emission System” & “175 miles until “65 MPH Max Speed”

      By ManyCamaroz · Posted

      It's a '21 and was a CPO with extended protection when purchased, so hopefully it will be covered.   I supposedly have all of it's service record history and nothing noted other than routine fluid changes, tire rotations, and the windshield washer nozzles replaced once. 
    • newdude
      LCA bolts

      By newdude · Posted

      I would argue that GMPartsDirect has that info wrong.    The service manual for R+R the lower arm and for adjusting camber/caster, none of the steps say to discard and replace the nut or the bolt.    The only part that gets discarded is the plastic cam adjustment retainer that is in the eccentric from the factory.     The LCA nut torque spec is:  First Pass: 180 Y (133 lb ft) Final Pass: 90 –105 Degrees   That is WELL past 130ft.lbs per the TSB that you reference that does not apply to this scenario.     As for your clunk.  I'd say it needs to be diagnosed thoroughly.  Assuming the LCA hardware is tight, you could have a problem with the UCA, sway bar end links, etc.      
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      The filtering to wear relationship goes like this:      'Relative Engine Life "Factor" new divided by the factor old. So 8/3= 2.67. That result is the multiplier thus if a motor had an effective life of 100K using a filter with a 45 micron rating at a Beta ratio of 75 then a filter with a micron rating of 10 at a Beta of 75 would improve expected engine life to 267,000 miles.    Wear metals are an indirect indicator. Less is better and the motor lives longer but there isn't a multiplier like there is for filtration so well documented. Most of that has to do with the sensitivity of the wear metals tests themselves. They read a 'slice' of the spectrum but not the absolute values for the entire spectrum. So a general indicator that is used WITH the results of other tests. Two others considered in this post. Trending is very important.    There is also the influence of corrosive wear which may be seen in the wear metals but separate from load based or viscosity mitigated indication. It's a small graph but the gray line is wear vs the TBN/TAN crossover. Not as useful as it used to be as there are now new chemistries for acid remediation that don't show up in standard UAO testing. They will catch up or be found liars. Only two possible outcomes, eh?             

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...