Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Has anyone run these on their 2500?

Roadmaster.JPG

Roadmaster1.JPG

Edited by GAMark
Added Pic
Posted

This doesn't look like a GM truck. Not needed on a HD truck

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, bruceb58 said:

This doesn't look like a GM truck. Not needed on a HD truck

Not true! I have been runing them since 2006 F250!

suspension component that works as a sway bar, a traction bar, and a helper spring points directly to the RoadActive Suspension (RAS) kit.

Works as a sway bar, a traction bar, and a helper spring.

Edited by GAMark
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, GAMark said:

Not true! I have been runing them since 2006 F250!

suspension component that works as a sway bar, a traction bar, and a helper spring points directly to the RoadActive Suspension (RAS) kit.

Works as a sway bar, a traction bar, and a helper spring.

I've got them and I think they work pretty decent, what I noticed right away is it took some of the bounce out of the rear end when going across washboard roads and railroad tracks when not towing. When towing my 5th wheel it seems to make the truck more stable.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, MrChips said:

I've got them and I think they work pretty decent, what I noticed right away is it took some of the bounce out of the rear end when going across washboard roads and railroad tracks when not towing. When towing my 5th wheel it seems to make the truck more stable.

Which ones did you get the HD or MD?

 

After driving back from South Carolina this morning, I can confidently say the unloaded ride is considerably better with the RAS installed than it was without it. The truck feels more stable, smoother over bumps, and overall more controlled. I wasn't expecting such a noticeable difference when unloaded, but so far I'm very impressed with the improvement.

Edited by GAMark
Posted
On 6/18/2026 at 9:27 AM, GAMark said:

Which ones did you get the HD or MD?

 

After driving back from South Carolina this morning, I can confidently say the unloaded ride is considerably better with the RAS installed than it was without it. The truck feels more stable, smoother over bumps, and overall more controlled. I wasn't expecting such a noticeable difference when unloaded, but so far I'm very impressed with the improvement.

 

Since the ride appears better, does that mean they are adjusted up so that it lifted the truck up some and therefore taking some of the workload off of the main spring pack and also preventing the main pack from landing down onto the bottom overload spring ?. A friend of mine put them on his half ton chev for towing a bumper pull RV as the half ton has rather sad springs to begin with and carrying much weight isn't what they were made for ... ride is the half tons bonus though because of that. 

 

I imagine it probably states in the instructions or application that its not meant to fit the 1 ton or I assume it would not fit as the overload leafs would be in the way and perhaps even the frame pad for that matter when the suspension would get stroked out with weight or a big bump.

Posted
On 6/18/2026 at 9:02 AM, MrChips said:

I've got them and I think they work pretty decent, what I noticed right away is it took some of the bounce out of the rear end when going across washboard roads and railroad tracks when not towing. When towing my 5th wheel it seems to make the truck more stable.

 

By rights these trucks should come from the factory or at least have a factory optional anti sway bar for towing high trailers and certainly slide in campers. GM always used to have their trucks fitted with rear sway bars if optioned properly but for some odd reason don't do that anymore. Certainly a sway bar would help that issue a lot, not the ride though but the leaning/control. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
22 hours ago, Chuck FB said:

 

Since the ride appears better, does that mean they are adjusted up so that it lifted the truck up some and therefore taking some of the workload off of the main spring pack and also preventing the main pack from landing down onto the bottom overload spring ?. A friend of mine put them on his half ton chev for towing a bumper pull RV as the half ton has rather sad springs to begin with and carrying much weight isn't what they were made for ... ride is the half tons bonus though because of that. 

 

I imagine it probably states in the instructions or application that its not meant to fit the 1 ton or I assume it would not fit as the overload leafs would be in the way and perhaps even the frame pad for that matter when the suspension would get stroked out with weight or a big bump.

Most 1 ton trucks come with the factory overload spring, which need to be removed for installation of RoadActive Suspension. Removing the overload allows proper fitment and ensures the system works as intended. The RAS® Mega-Duty kit will reduce squat and provide significant improvement vs the factory overload spring.

Edited by GAMark
  • Like 1
Posted

Yes I have is set with the 1mm disk (Minumim Tension), for spring spacing and I raised my truck in the rear 1.5". You can go 2mm  and I think 3mm if you need.Minimum. We are on our way to TN from GA.. My wife is driving and stated she cannot believe  and   stated she can not belive the difference.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/18/2026 at 10:27 AM, GAMark said:

Which ones did you get the HD or MD?

 

After driving back from South Carolina this morning, I can confidently say the unloaded ride is considerably better with the RAS installed than it was without it. The truck feels more stable, smoother over bumps, and overall more controlled. I wasn't expecting such a noticeable difference when unloaded, but so far I'm very impressed with the improvement.

Good question, I don't remember for sure but I believe it was the HD. I will check and get back to you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2000 Silverado 1500 LS, whenever I put it into reverse and also in drive it clunks, the truck also feels sluggish when driving. Any advice/ideas ?
    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...