Jump to content

sonoma lift kits


Recommended Posts

Posted

i have a 98 gmc sonoma 2wd, 2.2l, regular cab, stepside. im looking into getting a fabtech 1 1/2" suspension lift, and maybe a 2" body lift.

i have a few questions to some experts

with the supsension lift i want, you just replace the springs and add a balljoint spacer to get the camber back to fac specs( im not the shocks that are offered in the kit), if i just add the springs, i know my camber will be off a bit, is there enough adjustments in the front end to get it bak to specs without a special spacer? can i still use my original wheels, cause according to fabtech, i cant?! all im doing is puting on longer springs!

 

also, with a body lift on these newer trucks, is there enough slack in the wiring harness and hoses to lift the body 2"?

 

also, does anybody know where i can get a performance cam and/or exhause header for a '98  2.2L? i need some more power out of this engine.

hanx for the help!

Posted

First of all,welcome to the forum.It's good to have you with us.

 

The body lift will work just fine with your truck.You shoud not have any trouble with the wiring harness.

 

About the Fabtech,I don't see why you can't use the factory wheels but your best bet would be to get in touch with Fabtech and see why they state you can't use the wheels.I wouldn't be concerned with the spacers to reset your camber because after a suspension lift it is very highly recomended that you have the front end realigned and the camber will be adjusted then.

 

Hope this helps you out some.

Posted

i figured out my answer o the wheel question, and  i measuered my original factory wheels and they have a 4" offset, and fabtech requires a 3 3/4" offset.

 

ive got another question?  

 

ive been told by someone(dont remember who?) that with the basic fabtech lift kit( longer coil springs and balljoint spacers) that my balljoints would wear out faster cause their at a sharper angle. do you know of anyone that has used the basic lift kit and if they have a problem?

 

trhanx for all the help so far!

Posted

I'm not really familiar with the specs of the Fabtech kit but I can tell you that in general,s-series ball joints are not the best in the world.

 

I would say that if the lift is designed in a manner that strains the front end at all then yes you would have ball joint problems.

  • 5 months later...
Posted

i put a 2" body lift on my 99 sonoma ext cab ZR2. i had to because 32x11.50 tires wont fit on stock lift. mine worked fine. no problem with the hoses or wiring harnesses. i do have a small vibration in the gas pedal when i accelerate. but it is nothin that is a real problem. it was really easy to put on too. it took me 1/2 a day by myself.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...