Jump to content

Honda Truck?


KYChevy

Recommended Posts

Posted

Have you guys seen the new truck that Honda is coming out with? I'm kinda just blown away by a "Honda Truck" it just doesn't seem right. Wondering what you guys think, I know it will probably be a little one sided :thumbs:

Posted

From the early pictures I seen it looked like they kind of copied the avalanche

Posted

It is in the new issue of TT. They call it the Ridgeline. It looks alot like an Avalanche. The writer said that it was a small truck(like the other Jap one on the market) compared to the other full sizes.

Posted
I saw that on the Detroit Auto show on TV last night.  The trunk has a drain so you can fill it with ice and your drink of choice.  Nice Idea.  :thumbs:

 

 

 

 

I think one or both of the side saddle bins on the Av have that feature, too.

 

I had an employee that inherited a company car from a previous employee. He cleaned it up, but both he and his parents couldn't get a bad smell out of the car. Eventually, they looked in the spare tire well and didn't find a tire. It was half full with water and a dead fish. Apparently, the previous employee used it to ice fish on a fishing trip.

Posted

I will feel sorry for every person I see driving a Honda Truck! What a joke! I just don't see a market for it. Anyone seriously considering a full size truck won't even consider it. The engine is a joke, no power. I at least have to give Nissan props for coming out with a legit powerful engine in the market. Have you seen Toyota's new attempt at a "new" motor, all new 282hp, I guess for a 7/8th's fullsize truck, not bad. I just don't understand who at Honda decided it was a good idea to come out with a vehicle that will not sale more than maybe 25K, which is just a fraction of the truck market. Probably cost them more in R&D than they will make. Chris

Posted

This sucker is called the "ridgeline". Yea, only a 255-ish HP six. Max towing around 5K.

Give me my V-8, but I would trade fuel bills with it tho.

 

No midgate, so you are stuck with the little bed. Yea, the saddlebags on the 'lanche can hold ice (they have drains), but they are not insulated.

 

Of course it's smaller than the avalanche, but might be just the right size for the wannabe's. It's a honda, so it will be quiet, reliable, and effecient. They should sell all they can build. I hope it's being built in the states.

 

We are "discussing" it over at CAFCNA, too.

Posted

I've seen the guts already. It's an Acura MDX/Honda Pilot powertrain setup. You know...the one with no other mode than full time all wheel drive and no 4 low mode. Perfect for a truck right? :rolleyes

Posted

have you guys seen the undercarrage of the pilot? it looks like it's begging to get ripped apart offroad, things hanging down everywhere. suspesion curves all over the place, just waiting to get snagged

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...