Jump to content

image enhancing tweeter install


bballa

Recommended Posts

Posted

CMS 1'' Component Tweeters Soft Silk. I would like to install these tweeters in my truck as imaging enhancers, up in the corners of the dash. My question is how to wire them. My system consists of a pioneer deck(DEH-P77DH) a MTX mono amp running 2 subs, and a MTX 4 ch amp running my back spkrs and front comp spkrs(crystal CPE60s) Would it be best to power the tweeters from the front channel before the comps crossover so that the amp is powering the CPE60s and the pair of tweeters with their inline crossovers or power them from the decks internal amp. Thank’s

Posted
CMS 1'' Component Tweeters Soft Silk. I would like to install these tweeters in my truck as imaging enhancers, up in the corners of the dash. My question is how to wire them. My system consists of a pioneer deck(DEH-P77DH) a MTX mono amp running 2 subs, and a MTX 4 ch amp running my back spkrs and front comp spkrs(crystal CPE60s) Would it be best to power the tweeters from the front channel before the comps crossover so that the amp is powering the CPE60s and the pair of tweeters with their inline crossovers or power them from the decks internal amp. Thank’s

 

 

 

I'd power the tweeters from the MTX amp, not the in-dash Pionner. At high frequencies, there is little sound energy, so you won't be taxing the MTX amp by parallel-wiring the tweeters (with their crossover in the circuit), with the Crystal CPE60's.

 

The MTX amp is probably a lot lower distortion than the power amp in the Pioneer in-dash unit. So to keep your sound low distortion, with good imaging, I'd power from the MTX.

 

The only downside is you lose the ability to use the Pioneer's front level control to fade in the tweeters just right. Instead you might end up having to put a fader (L-pad, if you know what that is) on both new tweeters so you can bring their level down, or if the Crystals are louder, some series power resistor on the Crystals will attenuate them (and lighten their impedance).

 

Am I making sense to you?

Posted

I understand the imaging tweeters may need some attenuation separate from the front main speakers. A single stereo L-pad or one for each tweeter? Are they wired in line pos side only. I know an L-pad is basicly a variable resister but I have not used one in any of my car stereo installs. thanks

Posted
I understand the imaging tweeters may need some attenuation separate from the front main speakers. A single stereo L-pad or one for each tweeter? Are they wired in line pos side only. I know an L-pad is basicly a variable resister but I have not used one in any of my car stereo installs. thanks

 

 

 

The reason I suggested an L-pad for the tweeters is because they're likely to be very high impedance, relative to full range speakers, and a simple series resistor might not give you noticeable attenuation...depends on the tweeter, of course.

 

But a stereo L-pad will definitely give you attenuation. It has no choice. It's a non-inductive (frequency insensitive) voltage divider. It sets up one resistance between the pos and neg of the source, and then also sets up another resistance between the pos and neg of the tweeter. The resistance ratio is equal to the voltage ratio, so if before insterting the L-pad, 5 volts between pos and neg gave you 10 watts of sound output, when you dial the L-pad to half-way, 2.5 volts will give you 5 watts of sound output.

 

But also keep in mind that if the new tweeters are LESS efficient than the crystals, you're going to have the opposite problem. At that point, you could just use the same stereo L-pad on each channel of the crystals instead.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Hey Mike, thanks for your responses. How are those bass shakers working out for you ? Adding the imaging tweeters to my system was very easy and sonically worth the effort. I wired them to the rear channel of my four channel amp so that I could control their output seperately from my front spkrs with my decks fader. My deck has three outputs(front, rear, and nonfading sub). I just fade forward 1-3 positions on the fader and the spkrs blend very nicely and image great. It really moves the image up and forward with great detail. These Crystal speakers sound fantastic, and for the price I paid can't be beat! Highly recomended !!!! :cheers:

Posted
Hey Mike, thanks for your responses. How are those bass shakers working out for you ? Adding the imaging tweeters to my system was very easy and sonically worth the effort. I wired them to the rear channel of my four channel amp so that I could control their output seperately from my front spkrs with my decks fader. My deck has three outputs(front, rear, and nonfading sub). I just fade forward 1-3 positions on the fader and the spkrs blend very nicely and image great. It really moves the image up and forward with great detail. These Crystal speakers sound fantastic, and for the price I paid can't be beat! Highly recomended !!!! :cheers:

 

 

 

Glad everything worked for you. :cheers:

 

The bass shakers worked like I had hoped. I can get sinful bass from my Infinity Basslink, and the bass shakers just add to the pounding when the drums or the bass get really deep. It's truly satisfying.

 

I'm running them with just enough gain to make the bottoms of the front seats vibrate the same as the Basslink makes the back of the seat vibrate. The bass on more than one track has amazed me. It really feels like you are in a bar with a live band. And since I just got XM for my Pioneer, I've found that XM is a great bass source! That digital signal has a full bottom end; it's not "compressed" like regular FM radio.

 

The amazing thing is how well the bass shakers can blend with the tactile information given out by the Basslink. At first I was running the bass shakers a little hot, but I forced myself to turn their gain down a bit so I couldn't pick them out separate from the Basslink. Now they're seamless, and life is good.

 

Now you can't even tell they're on, unless I turn them off. You definitely notice their absense. I'm running a Pioneer 35W/ch (rms) amp to the 50W/ch (rms) bass shakers, it's about right. The Basslink puts out 110 dB from 30 to 100 hz with no effort, and I have no need for anything any higher.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...