Jump to content

1001 Horsepower


Black02Silverado

Recommended Posts

Posted

Might just have to pick one up as a daily driver -- you know, to save wear and tear on my truck.

Posted

This is a very neat car. To me the way VW engineered this car is quite amazing.

 

It uses a W aspiration. This means it has four complete cylinder banks all bound by one crank shaft. It looks kinda like two Vs tiled at 45 degree angles.

 

The tranny is a 7 speed that uses a double wet cluctch system. Thats the kinda trannys you'd see on Formula 1 cars.

 

Good stuff.

Posted

According to Supercars.net, in 2002 Bugatti created the Veyron 16/4 Concept with the W-16 and had 1000.1 hp reported. This may be the same car, just refined and made .9 hp more powerful this time around. The 1992 Vector WX3 used a turbocharged Oldsmobile Aurora V8 to hit the 1k hp mark. SC.net also reports a 2005 Hennessey-induced "Venom 1000" Viper SRT-10 capable of 1k in pony-power and 1.1k in torque. Click here for the page: Viper Venom 1000. I agree with OUMike in the process of this car. The W-16 configuation is a truely outstanding piece of modern engine technology. Something like this, if I'm not mistaken: \||/

 

And the 7-speed gearbox perhaps?:

 

1 3 5 7

|--|--|--|

2 4 6 R

 

Hey, it was the best I could do with what I had. I'm not Da Vinci of the PC keyboard. :rolleyes:

Posted
According to Supercars.net, in 2002 Bugatti created the Veyron 16/4 Concept with the W-16 and had 1000.1 hp reported. This may be the same car, just refined and made .9 hp more powerful this time around. The 1992 Vector WX3 used a turbocharged Oldsmobile Aurora V8 to hit the 1k hp mark. SC.net also reports a 2005 Hennessey-induced "Venom 1000" Viper SRT-10 capable of 1k in pony-power and 1.1k in torque. Click here for the page: Viper Venom 1000. I agree with OUMike in the process of this car. The W-16 configuation is a truely outstanding piece of modern engine technology. Something like this, if I'm not mistaken: \||/

 

And the 7-speed gearbox perhaps?:

 

1  3  5  7

|--|--|--|

2  4  6  R

 

Hey, it was the best I could do with what I had. I'm not Da Vinci of the PC keyboard.  :rolleyes:

 

 

 

 

The Venom cars are impressive to a degree. I actually live in Houston, TX where John Hennessey does these cars. Its knowledge among the tuner companies that he oes very very poor business. When I was about 15 or so I become very interested in the ZR-1 Corvette and joined the www.zr1.net to learn all I could. There were a couple of guys on the board that shared horror stories about how deadlines for completion were never met, cars were even wrecked or damaged in his shop.

 

Thats about right on the W-16. What is impressive about the car to me is how it utilizes the quad-turbo system. The turbochargers are setup so they spool at different times much like a 911 Turbo. This way there is virtually no turbo lag. The main reason for using the W configuration is to use 16 cylinders without massive displacement. Essentially it enables a tighter package.

 

Actually this car (like most of these newer performance cars) uses a F1 style paddle shifter. The consol lever is mainly for swapping between D and R.

 

A while back I discovered this car and became pretty interested in it. www.howstuffworks.com has a great artcile on it and how it operates, and Bugatti's manufacture page has some great short clips.

Posted
Thats about right on the W-16.  What is impressive about the car to me is how it utilizes the quad-turbo system.  The turbochargers are setup so they spool at different times much like a 911 Turbo.  This way there is virtually no turbo lag.  The main reason for using the W configuration is to use 16 cylinders without massive displacement.  Essentially it enables a tighter package.

 

Actually this car (like most of these newer performance cars) uses a F1 style paddle shifter.  The consol lever is mainly for swapping between D and R.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Much like a 911 turbo, but with the addition of two more turbos?

 

Thanks for the info, Mike. Very cool. :rolleyes::cheers:

Posted

I actually read in a magazine yesterday in the doctors office that this car actually has a horsepower gauge...how cocky is that? The figure quoted by Bugatti is actually a german mesurement or 1001 PS. This is about 987 American HP.

Posted

I woundn't say that's cocky, I'd say that it's a proving point to how powerful the car is. I wonder if they have the onboard equipment in-car to measure that power like how they do at a speed shop, such as on "HorsePower TV". A full setup of gauges and diagnostic equipment right there in the comfort of the drivers' seat. Wow.

 

I can see it at the local service shop:

 

"Oil psi up"

 

"Temp normal"

 

"Trans temp cool"

 

"Horsepower through the goddamn roof" :chevrolet:

 

So it's not really at 1k, huh? Still, 987hp is nothing to sneeze at.

 

Oh, and I pulled some power formulae from my profile notepad for anyone to compare and contrast numbers.

 

1 hp=746 watts or 0.746 kilowatts.

horsepower to watts, multiply by 746.

watts to horsepower, multiply by 0.00134.

horsepower to kilowatts, multiply by 0.746.

kilowatts to horsepower, multiply by 1.34.

 

61 cubic inches=1 liter/1000 cubic centimeters (1000cm³).

liters to cubic inches, multiply by 61.

cubic inches to liters, divide by 61.

 

kg-m to lb-ft, multiply by 7.23.

lb-ft to kg-m, multiply by 0.13.

Nm to lb-ft, multiply by 0.737.

lb-ft to Nm, multiply by 0.737.

Posted
I woundn't say that's cocky, I'd say that it's a proving point to how powerful the car is.

 

 

 

 

I said cocky, but I really thought it was cool. I thought it was one of the neatest things I'd seen in a while. The gauge would show the increasing hp as the car increased in speed. The arctile mentioned that only like 266 hp was required for 155 mph. Just emagine what the car is capable WOT. It also mentioned that in 7th gear WOT the car got about 4 mpg. ouch...

 

I'm talkin' about the Nov issue of Automobile mag if anyone is interested. The main artcile that caught my eye was ZO6 vs. GT vs. Viper but I didn't have a chance to read that. Whadya know the one time I actually don't mind waiting in the doctors office they speed me right through.

Posted

Man, ain't that the truth !!!! I can remember two times actually finding something decent to read in the doctors/dentists office, and they breeze you thru, but any other time it's slower than the DMV....

Posted
Ok I know this is a different Bugati but this is a cool site none the less.

http://www.wreckedexotics.com/bugatti/index.shtml

 

 

 

 

Yea...I been there. That site makes me sick haha. EB110 SS one of my favorite cars. I believe the EB cars use the 60 valve V12s. I think they too are quad-turbocharged. For a short time that was the "Worlds Fastest Car" at like 221 I beileve.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
    • *Your      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...