Jump to content

Cab Mount Bolt Specs & Side Steps Install....


Recommended Posts

Posted

I just purchased a set of side steps for my 09 Sierra and they mount to the body mount brackets (using different length bolts to replace factory). I was reviewing the install instructions and they did not specify what I should torque the body mount bolts back to after install and when I e-mailed them for tech support they said to 'just tighten them with a ratchet and you should be ok'. What are these bolts tightened to from factory? Should I tighten the longer replacement bolts to the same specs? Thanks.

Posted
I just purchased a set of side steps for my 09 Sierra and they mount to the body mount brackets (using different length bolts to replace factory). I was reviewing the install instructions and they did not specify what I should torque the body mount bolts back to after install and when I e-mailed them for tech support they said to 'just tighten them with a ratchet and you should be ok'. What are these bolts tightened to from factory? Should I tighten the longer replacement bolts to the same specs? Thanks.

 

Well I installed the step bars this weekend.....had to use the factory body mount bolts and torqued them to 40 ft-lbs. I spent half an hour at my dealership trying to find out what to torque them to however they could not find any information. If anyone else knows or has a general idea what they should be torqued to let me know.

Posted
I just purchased a set of side steps for my 09 Sierra and they mount to the body mount brackets (using different length bolts to replace factory). I was reviewing the install instructions and they did not specify what I should torque the body mount bolts back to after install and when I e-mailed them for tech support they said to 'just tighten them with a ratchet and you should be ok'. What are these bolts tightened to from factory? Should I tighten the longer replacement bolts to the same specs? Thanks.

 

Well I installed the step bars this weekend.....had to use the factory body mount bolts and torqued them to 40 ft-lbs. I spent half an hour at my dealership trying to find out what to torque them to however they could not find any information. If anyone else knows or has a general idea what they should be torqued to let me know.

 

 

I am guessing the steps you bought didnt have instructions as to re-torque spec on the bolts. When I bought mine I think the instructions had this listed. I do not have the instructions anymore, but I think it was more than 40 ft lbs, however I could be very wrong.

 

You could try a search, dont know how much help that would be though. Hopefully someone else will chime in.

Posted

Just make sure they are good and tight. Our shop has been installing steps with a calibrated impact (set for 50 ft/lbs) for years and never had any problem. In fact all large bolt on accessories get the same treatment. (Wheels and engine components obviously not included) If they aren't tight enough, you'll know because they will creak when the truck twists.

Posted

Just as an update. I torqued my mounts to 50 and continued to have creaking sounds so I gradually worked my way up to 75lb ft and that was the ticket to silence my cab mounts.

Posted

Everyone thanks for the info. I torqued mine to 55 and have slight creak on the passenger side....so tomorrow I will increase it until I get silence, which will probably be 75 ft/lbs.

Posted

I just went through a round of tightening and testing and I am still a failure..... I have them torqued to 80 ft/lbs and they still creak. It seems that it is the passenger side only..... Anyone have any suggestions? I don't want to over-tighten and snap something off. The sega continues...... if I can't get it to silence I will re-install and if that doesn't work then I don't know what to do next......

Posted

I installed a part of Nasta stainless steals last week instructions say 40 ft lbs - there are no sqeaks or odd noise...

Make sure to only hand tighten all 6 bolts before tightenting - this will help the align everything. ONce everyhting lines up and is centered then tighten the bolts that hold bars to the brackets first. Then tighten the bracket bolts to the frame/body. I think this sequence helps - at least it worked for me. Also, make sure to use lock tite on the new aftermarket bolts the come w/ the new bars (instructions do not tell you this). I used the blue (serviceable) i think it is 242. I Noticed the OEM bolts have a patch of lock tite on the them but the instructions from nasta did not specify to do this.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • probably won't get a response from that user, as they haven't returned to the site since making that one post.  users don't (at least I don't, and I haven't seen any setting which would notify me via say, email) get any notification other than going to this site, and checking if they got a response on their thread...
    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...