Jump to content

Rv Opinions


TroyDairy

Recommended Posts

Posted

So what do you guys think? I can get a nice 10 year old trailer (26') for 5k or a nice 13 year old motorhome for 7k. I have a ski boat I like to take along when camping but we always go with a group of folk so getting one of them to tow the boat when I got the trailer should be ok. Besides as the family grows a Yukon looks emminet which could take the boat. But the motorhome is perfect when just the family goes for a long day trip. Only draw back is you can't run around when camp is set with a motorhome unless you tow a car. I cant .."legally" tow a boat and a trailer here like in the other NW states, lame. Any ops from you guys?

Posted

I bought a TT since I could unhook and leave it if i had to get some beer. Otherwise if you're all settled in, motorhome hooked up to the site, you have to undo everything to drive out for something.

Posted
TT

 

 

I currently have both.The RV sits most of the year cuz we use the toy hauler to get the dirtbikes to the camping areas and like 90454SS said it's nice to unhook so you can go to the market or wherever and leave everything all set up.So the TT gets my vote

Posted

I camp with people who have both. The ones who have to "run around" have trailers. The rest of us have motorhomes.

 

To me camping is camping, if you aren't prepared and have to run around, just get a cabin or stay home. ;)

 

Seriously. it's your choice, but the motorhomes are much more comfortable and more fun on the trips. It sucks being crammed into a pickup or SUV for a long ride. You don't have to stop for anything and they are usually fully self contained. Most trailers don't have all the nice commodities like a motorhome comes from the factory with (hydraulic jacks, a generator, etc.)

 

Many people go from a trailer to a motorhome, very few go from a motorhome to a trailer.

 

Motorhomes are also more expensive. IMO, that is the main reason people choose a trailer over a motorhome (besides the excuse to buy a truck)............

Posted

I wanted a class c; wife wouldn't let me buy it. With 3 kids we park the trailer, take the bicycles to a trailhead or the kids to a waterpark or some sight to see.

 

Then when my buddy with a class c talks me into going with him to a 2 day offroad cycle ride, he cracks a side cover on his bike and it's off to find a welder or epoxy. In 30 years of offroading, I've never cracked a side cover. Not fun driving around that behemoth to find a country auto parts store.

Posted

Wow, that has to be nice!

 

 

Leaving this morning for camping and country music till next monday. Everyone wants to ride in the motorhome.........imagine that......

Posted

What I dont get is Motorhomes are really reasonable. I dotn wanna spend more then 6k since 1st timer here. TT are about 2-3 time higher priced then NADA book!!! People are nuts! I can get a new 07 for 12k or they want $8k for a 94'. Retarded. When you bring up the fact their rig has been on CL for 4 months they look at you blankly...lol. "You may be over priced if no-one even offers you on your TT buddy.", I'll say...blankness continues. :rollin:

Posted

I bet alot are asking payoff....many people got into the camping scene when money was cheap and easy to be had. Put nothing down and financing for 15 years got you a low payment but 5-6 years down the line, the nut is still high. We're looking for a new or slightly used TT and the deals are there if you find them. We're also looking for a specific floorplan which you couldn't do that well if looking at used but the economy has forced out a few for us. Good luck on your search!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.
    • Stabilitrack was a stability control, traction control system, that functioned independently from the transfer case.   Z-71 has nothing to do with the transfer case or differential.   If it does have an AWD system, my memory recalls this being specific to the Denali trim, converting won't be as simple as swapping out mechanical parts like differentials and transfer cases. It will require reprogramming at a minimum. Long story short, not likely worth it.   Pulling a fuse, may disable the AWD system, it might also prevent any other transfer case functions.   However, the AWD case was generally based on the same transfer case you refer to in the 2006 Suburban. If it still has a 4-High and 4-Low where the transfer case locks and splits power 50-50 front to rear, what are you gaining by changing anything? A true-rear wheel drive only, what good will that serve? Not enough to go through the trouble of changing out all the parts.    Generally, all the factory systems will handle a 33" tire and re-gearing. Probably a 35" tire too, if you aren't driving like a caveman. If 35" tires are in the plan...   If you do plan on driving like a caveman or are fully committed to 35" tires, an entire re-think of the build is probably in order. Starting with square one, an IFS front end isn't going to be the best starting point for 35's and caveman driving. 
    • 1/2 qt over full ain`t gonna hurt $h!t. Most times, a whole qt won`t either. Most have windage trays now. As long as the crank isn`t slapping itself in the oil, it`s not the end of the world.   We used to overfill 1 qt at the track, at race time. Better to have it over full than having the pan sucked dry at 6500 rpm`s.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...