Jump to content

P Or Lt Tires And Tpms Range


andyems

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have the Rough Country 2 inch leveling kit on the way for my '07 Silverado. I want to upgrade the tires to a larger size than the stock 265/70-17s. I have looked at the 275/70-17, but they are only made in LT load range, not P metric. They are only load range C, and I was wondering if anyone knew much about changing from P to LT tires? I am afraid if I go up to the 285s that it will be too big, and my mileage and power will suffer, and the 275s seem like a nice medium area, all except for the LT rating.

I rarely tow or haul, mostly just empty driving, and it's a reg cab Z71, so it doesn't ride like a Caddy to start with. Any ideas on this? Also, if I do upgrade to the LTs, will my stock TPMS read the higher pressure levels without throwing up a "high" red flag? Thanks for the help.

Posted

I wouldn't be worried at all about going to LT tires, in fact I wouldn't buy a set of P tires when replacing.

P (car tires) on Truck just doesn't make sense to me, but as far as the TPMS goes, you shouldn't have any troubles, you'll just need to reset/recalibrate them, do a search on here or google, and you find it is extremely simple

Posted
I have the Rough Country 2 inch leveling kit on the way for my '07 Silverado. I want to upgrade the tires to a larger size than the stock 265/70-17s. I have looked at the 275/70-17, but they are only made in LT load range, not P metric. They are only load range C, and I was wondering if anyone knew much about changing from P to LT tires? I am afraid if I go up to the 285s that it will be too big, and my mileage and power will suffer, and the 275s seem like a nice medium area, all except for the LT rating.

I rarely tow or haul, mostly just empty driving, and it's a reg cab Z71, so it doesn't ride like a Caddy to start with. Any ideas on this? Also, if I do upgrade to the LTs, will my stock TPMS read the higher pressure levels without throwing up a "high" red flag? Thanks for the help.

 

Even with LT tires, keep the pressures between 35-45 PSI and you'll be fine... there's no reason to run higher then that in a 1500 light duty series truck. (I'm running my front at 40 and my rears at 35 and they're actually a bit over inflated). I bump up the pressure in my rear tires to 50 psi when towing my friends 6000+ lb boat and that makes my TPMS light come on, but its just for towing once in a while.

 

People will go insane with tire pressure tech... but seriously if you're within 35-45 on your truck you'll be fine.

 

When you start getting below the 30-35 range LT tires become questionable due to their build, some members think heat may be a factor which makes sense... and over 45+ PSI is just overkill for the daily driven weight of your truck so the ride will begin to suffer, traction/stopping performance is declined, and the center of the tire will begin to wear.

Posted

The Toyo Tires link below addresses switching from P-metric to LT-metric tires. Also, any good tire dealer should have separate load and inflation tables for both types of tires. By comparing specific tires in these tables, they should also be able to tell you what pressure you would need to run in the LT tires based on the O.E. tire specs on your door sticker. The higher cold inflation pressure requirements and heavier construction of the LT-metric tire would impact the ride and handling of your truck.

 

http://toyotires.com/sites/default/files/l...echbulletin.pdf

Posted

I installed a set of Cooper Discoverer STT tires in LT305/60R18, which are an "E" load range LT designated tire. I keep them at ~42psi.

 

Because they are a heavier load range tire, they are heavier, stiffer, and do provide for a more rigid ride than stock P-metric tires, but it is a 4x4 truck. Really not bad at all.

 

The TPMS sensors are still in an acceptable range, therefore I did not have to recalibrate them.

 

These tires are a bit heavier, and these specific tires have an agressive tread pattern, therefore, they do affect my gas mileage a bit. I get between 12 and 13 mpg in town.

 

That is one of the sacrifices I decided to make, and I have no regrets.

Posted

I bought P-Series tires for my '07 GMC Sierra C1500, but they are rated at 2,535 lbs max load per tire (10,140lb total), which is much higher than a normal P-series tire, and I didn't have to pay the LT tire price.

 

I bought Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10's, and LOVE them!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I've tried everything and still have the rattle.  My next thing to eliminate is the seatbelt connection on the real pillar.  The cover seems loose and could be the source.  I found one of my grandsons video games in the back seat rest compartment   and had a glimmer of joy, but that wasn't it.  I'll keep trying.  
    • I'm tangentially aware of what Harley used to be, back in my riding days, although I was into Italian sport bikes. Ducati seems to have gone the other way; still very expensive, but they've made a large subset of their bikes a lot more reliable and accessible, and they've diversified their lineup to include other riding sports too. IMO, a good example of where greed and growth might have also been beneficial to the consumer.   Although GM is charging a relative premium for its most popular pickups, I find that there are some excellent value propositions in its lineup as well.   The Colorado still strikes me as the most attractive midsize on the market, and also the most reasonably priced given capability and features. There's a part of me that wishes I would have bought one instead of my Silverado.   The Equinox ...I must be getting old. The ICE equinox is a great design IMO. Probably because it reminds me visually of an actual SUV aka an S Blazer. Underneath it's nothing even remotely close, but it LOOKS good. It's got all the modern features plus some at a very reasonable price. If I had to run out and buy myself a daily commuter to do everything except tow, an Equinox would be on my list.   It does bug me that mid-tier 1500's reach into the 50-60k range, and Tahoes and Burbs are even more expensive. Less than 10 years ago, dealers were sitting on rows of Tahoe LS and LT's for low 40's. You could even still find Tahoes with a front bench, still!
    • Big oil is raking in billions from the Iran war. Can it avoid Trump’s fury?   Remember I said Big Oil is 'Vertically Integrated"?   Even as they no longer own the majority of the "Pump" they still own the "Well". Crude price upward pressure does not translate into that same pressure on production. Pumping cost remain unaffected and the gap is pure profit. Even after subtraction of a minor, comparatively, lower amount from supposed, but not always, realized refining volume. Consumers hate war, Big Oil, not so much.
    • We live in a world where the average person expects more. People say wages and our needs are farther apart. My first new home had 3 bedrooms and one bedroom. My first car and truck had what would be considered a stripped or work vehicle. In my neighborhood back then there were more homes like that and cars too. Middle managers and second home buyers worked their way up to the fancy houses and cars. Car loans were 3 years. GM had different models of cars for different income levels. The cars were pretty much the same size if you wanted a big vehicle. The nameplate designated the opulence. Chevy, Pontiac, Buick, Oldsmobile and Cadillac.  To be fair some of the cost is government mandated. We can’t blame them for giving us what people will pay for. Careful advertising steering people towards more profitable SUVs and trucks. As I learned recently a minivan is a cheaper more efficient form of transportation. Certainly easier to live with. Somebody realized the profit margin wasn’t as big and gave it a soccer mom label. So it lost its coolness. They’re making it the masses are buying it. You hit your hand with a hammer you can’t blame the hammer.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...