Jump to content

2500hd Vs F150 Vs Police Officer


Recommended Posts

Posted

I found this incident quite amusing, so I thought I would share it. I'm driving down a 2 lane highway to go to Lowes, which is about a 14 mile ride. There are traffic lights along the highway, so chances are you will wind up getting a red light during your drive, I winded up catching 4 out of 6 of them during the 14 mile drive on the 2 lane highway. I'm driving my 2500HD and am at a light waiting for it to turn green, to the right of me is a guy with a female passenger in a F150 which was the 97-03 Gen truck (looking at the truck, I'd say it had to be a 97-98). Always when I light turns green, I naturally excellerate faster then the other vehicles behind me, or on the side of me, not because I am trying to race them, just the way I usually excellerate the truck (1/4 way on the gas pedal). So I take off at the light, the F150 to my right is fading behind as I see in my right sideview, I get up to highway speed and maintain 70-80 mph (depending on if my radar detector starts alerting me to a possible threat) then I'll slow down 10 mph on this particular highway cause speed limit is 55. So I'm cruisng about 70 and holding it there, then the driver in the F150 catches up finally and does the same speed on right lane, then excellerates faster, only to slow down so I catch up. He was trying to pick a race with me. Ok, so second light is coming up and it is red, so we both eventially come to a stop and await the green light. Light turns green, he is still in right lane, I excellerate same as usuall, with 1.4 way on the pedal, and again the F150 starts to fade away as I pull away. Get up to 70 again and maintain speed, then the guy in the F150 is able to catch up again, and repeats same tatic (match my speed, then excellerate past me). Like the guy is not feeling sort of embarrassment in front of his female passenger cause I took him twice at two different lights so far.

 

So we both happened to catch the following red light, we come to a complete stop and wait for the green light. Then the guy in the F150 puts his truck in N and starts reving it at the light (what for, IDK) All I hear is him giving it alot of gas with his all stock 97-98 F150 2wd truck (which that generation reminds me alot of a Ford Windstar minivan with a bed on it). Light turns green, I take off same way again, 1/4 way on the pedal and again, the F150 fades away as I move forward. This time I get up to about 80, as the highway gets wider and there was no other traffic in sight for as far as I can see ahead of me for 1 mile plus. Finally and once again, the driver in the F150 is able to catch up and same behavior repeated, maintain same speed as me, then accelerate faster. By now I am thinking either this guy is just plain stupid cause his truck is weak and cannot take my 2500HD or he is getting really frustrated. So he then accelerates at a higher speed, probably doing 90 at some point cause I maintained 80 mph until my radar detector starting alerting me, then i slowed down to 70. Then what do you know, another red light, where we both get caught at. He's in the right lane, I'm still in the left at the light, before this light turned green, I could see him in my periphinal vision looking over at me, moving around and clenching his steering wheel, with left hand at 11 o'clock and right hand at 1 o'clock. He then does the (give it gas, then brake right after, like you see on TV when two vehicles are about to race with rerun movies). I laugh. Light then turns green, and again, I accelerate same as usually, with about 1/4 way on the pedal and see him fading away as I move forward. Get up to about 68 this time and maintain speed, cause two lane highway turns into a one lane 1 mile ahead right after sharp bend in the highway and speed drops down to 45 mph. So after mainting my speed at around 68 or so, the guy in the F150 catches up again, does the same thing, maintain speed, then accellerate faster. As he was accellerating faster, my radar detector alerts me with the Ka/band, and then with the VGA/band (which is a radar detector..dectector signal) however I am invisible to it. This time I see a police officer after I come around the bend and he just pulled out to go after the guy driving the F150 cause he must of been exceeding 90 mph again. Sure enough he gets pulled over and has some explaining to do as to why he was doing over 90 mph in a 55. As I pass the traffic stop I could not help but look at the guy and laugh at his stupidity, as he actaully thought he had a chance with his 97-98 F150 that looks like a Windstar with a pick up bed, and his naive attitude, not to mention he was probably trying to impress his female passenger.

 

For the record I've driven that year truck before, and it is a real dog when it comes to accellerating. My previous F250 which was a 96 was able to beat that truck in accelleration, and that F250 couldn't hold a candle to my 2500HD when it came to accelleration, payload, performance, reliabilty, ect.

Posted

Yeah, I know, people don't believe a 2500HD is fast. Those people are stupid, the 2500HD is the fastest truck I have ever had. Well, I take that back, I had an 2003 SS before my current 2005 1500 truck.

Posted
Are radar detectors illeagal in PA and NJ now. I know they been banned in Virginia for years.

 

 

Nope! In NYC they are, and I am not sure about upstate NY, but I think if they are in NYC, then probably in entire state.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

lol this is funny... im always looking for little red light races.... usually 0-speed limit just to keep it legal...i guess. ive yet to have anyone actually try and accelerate and try to keep up or beat me out yet so idk....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...