Jump to content

True Duals Vs. "fake" Duals


Recommended Posts

Posted

I want to get a new exhaust and some people tell me to get the true duals because it sounds better than just two pipes stemming out of one muffler. Any help on this I would appreciate. Thanks.

Posted

true duals will give u a lil more power and help alleviate back pressure. it will be a lil louder. but if you do it get an x pipe put in

Posted
true duals will give u a lil more power and help alleviate back pressure. it will be a lil louder. but if you do it get an x pipe put in

 

 

WOuld it still sound bada$$ with the single flowmaster???

Posted

yea. i told you i love mine. you saw how i set mine up

Posted

are you saying yes or no to true duals or the x/h pipe jenna?

Posted

True duals (without X or H pipe) will give you a "cackle" sound like some of the old muscle cars or 70's trucks with glass packs used to have. Fake duals are cheaper, and will give you more of a deeper tone, without the cackle. In my experience, drone and resonance is more of a problem with fake duals unless you buy an expensive muffler that is tuned specifically for your engine (magnaflow). As far as an X or H pipe, I don't think it's that important on a stock motor. Personally, I love the cackle of true duals. Some people don't. I had true duals with 18 inch glass packs on my '06 and loved the way it sounded. Good luck :D

Posted

John Force and Austin Coil...Austin, can you make my funny car sound more loud so people will think its badazz going down the strip. Well yeah John but performance may suffer. Damn performance, Austin, I just want to sound badazz :D

Posted

A good sounding exhaust is in the ear of the beholder, search on Youtube or this forum for sound clips and then decide what you want. Spending a few hundred dollars on an exhaust system and then being dissatisfied sucks.

 

DEWFPO

Posted
are you saying yes or no to true duals or the x/h pipe jenna?

 

We are running true duals (with an X pipe) on our Silverado. If you are planning on running duals, I would highly recommend using an X pipe with two mufflers.

Posted
John Force and Austin Coil...Austin, can you make my funny car sound more loud so people will think its badazz going down the strip. Well yeah John but performance may suffer. Damn performance, Austin, I just want to sound badazz :D

 

"Damn perforrmance, I just want to sound bad a$$!" :seeya:

Posted

I have flowmaster true duals and they don't drone at all at 65mph. I don't have an x pipe either. They did sound sorta loud and obnoxious when I first put them on, but now, 20,000 miles down the road they sound really good.

Posted

I have true duals with no mufflers at all and no X or H pipe. Just headers to pipe into 4" tips out back. This is what you want if you're doing the whole "loud" thing.

Posted

What are you doing to run true duels on the NNBS trucks, I got a 2010 with a 5.3, are you putting headers on or cutting the third cat off?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Diesel or gas?  The 37s will obviously, drastically reduce mpg, but the gasser will take a bigger hit to mpg, and power.    I wouldn't sweat a gear change on a duramax at all, and unlikely on the gasser either. You're obviously not concerned with acceleration or towing, and the 10spd will find itself in the right gear without much hunting, if any. 
    • I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...