Jump to content

Reprogramming 09 Chevy Truck


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone, New guy here. I know this has been brought up before but wanted to check with you all before I do this. I've got a stock 2009 ext. cab 5.3 3.42 rear with 24,000 miles. By what the dash tells me the best I can get out of the truck is 14mpg. More than once on the hwy. I've got 13.8. I've watched it switch from v8 to v4 and back to v8 just by taking a breath. I know you all talk about using a programer by BB but nothing about the Chevy dealership. I talked to them the other day and they recommended turning the afm off and run it on all 8. They said it would not void the warranty. They said it should get me another 2mpg. Does all this sound right? Or is there something else I can do to improve the mileage? The dealership checked the truck out and said everything checked out ok. Thanks for any help.

Posted

Thats a first coming from the dealership. Most are against it. I'd be surprised if you got 2mpg more by turning it off. I turned mine off, and saw no difference.

Posted

how fast are you driving on the highway? are you in hills and are you maintaining a constant speed?

Posted
how fast are you driving on the highway? are you in hills and are you maintaining a constant speed?

 

Thanks all for the response. Hwy miles were fairly flat. Speed was right at 70. Even with the cruise control on it still goes in and out of afm. I had a 1992 truck that still got 18 in town with 200,000 miles on it. Wished I never sold it. Been thinking about buying an older model and redoing it and sell this one. Thanks again.

Posted

if you are getting 14 and that checks out with the old school hand calculation, I'd say there is a problem for sure. You should be getting at least 16. Are your tire pressures up, how much ethanol is in your fuel? A lot of things can contribute, but that doesn't sound right.

Posted
if you are getting 14 and that checks out with the old school hand calculation, I'd say there is a problem for sure. You should be getting at least 16. Are your tire pressures up, how much ethanol is in your fuel? A lot of things can contribute, but that doesn't sound right.

I'm running 40psi in the tires. 87 oct. don't remember the ethanol amount. Shell gas. Calculator said 14.189 mpg. This is something else I was wondering about. I was reading on another sight about people having to have their lifters replaced because they went bad under 50,000 miles. Know anything about that? Thanks.

Posted

I got my truck BB tuned and turned off the AFM and saw a little bump in my MPG. The performance gain is a nice plus also. If your on the fence about a BB tune I'd say go with it. BTW im running the 93 octane tune.

Posted
I got my truck BB tuned and turned off the AFM and saw a little bump in my MPG. The performance gain is a nice plus also. If your on the fence about a BB tune I'd say go with it. BTW im running the 93 octane tune.

Thanks everyone. I'm happy with the power the truck has. Just wished it would get 2-3 more mpg.

Posted

"I've got 13.8. I've watched it switch from v8 to v4 and back to v8 just by taking a breath. "

 

I have had the same experience... Mine is a Crew Cab and I have never seen an average of over 16, even with

stock 245's. I expected a drop with my new Toyo MT's, but was hoping for better mileage than my current avg of 12.9 calculated at 75mph, flat hwy, cruise, mild acceleration, etc. It very rarely stays in V4.

 

I dont believe anything is "wrong" with the truck, it has never thrown a code and has been flawless over the year I've had it. I just have not seen anyhting near some of the mileage returns posted here.

Posted

on flat land at about 70 mph you should be getting around 16-16.5, maybe even 17 mpg.

 

your truck won't stay in 4 cyl mode at that speed, it's just too much power required and wind resistance to maintain that speed. I have adjusted my tune myself a little (look for my thread in this section) and achieved much better economy at around 55-60 mph

Posted

maybe your brakes are dragging or something? I vary rarely get below 16, I live in hilly CT and drive 30/70 city/highway and that mileage is in the winter, it mostly depends on how much i use remote start and how long i let it sit to warm up.

Posted

How would one go about asking the dealer about poor mileage? As I mentioned, there is no obvious sign of problems... The truck runs perfect, I dont think anything like stuck brakes is going on, it is much quicker than my old Silverado (with the 4-speed) and far ahead of my 05 F150 with the 5.4.

Posted
How would one go about asking the dealer about poor mileage? As I mentioned, there is no obvious sign of problems... The truck runs perfect, I dont think anything like stuck brakes is going on, it is much quicker than my old Silverado (with the 4-speed) and far ahead of my 05 F150 with the 5.4.

 

 

When I took mine in, I told them about the mileage. They said they would check the settings on it. But they didn't find anything. One other thing some of you might not know. I didn't till I checked it out. Just for the heck of it I checked my truck out on carfax before I took it in. Found out it showed the times I had the oil changed. When I took it in for the mileage thing I asked the guy there if checking the truck out will show up on carfax. He told me " What was I talking about. Nothing shows up on carfax. He acted like a jerk. I told him I already check it. Showed the day they received the truck when I bought it. When I picked it up. Etc. He just walked off and acted like I did'nt know what I was talking about. Just a heads up.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption?  I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 
    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
    • Our customers' safety isn't something we take lightly. To ensure you get the proper assistance for your truck's repairs, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...