Jump to content

Is your GMT-900 using oil  

1,555 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wow that's crap.. On my invoice 8 plugs were itemized along with the other parts, gaskets, etc etc.

 

 

Any one else that had the piston and ring job, get plugs included?

Posted

NNBS 2007 Sierra 5.3l CC Z71. Oil consumption started around 25k miles, and has progressively gotten worse. Now has 45k miles. I have used only Royal Purple 5w30 and its starting to get REALLY expensive.

 

I also have a 2009 silverado with the 5.3 l with just under 30k miles and absolutely no oil consumption..

 

James

Posted

Get a tuner and turn off the AFM on the 09' for sure. Probably too late on the 07'. Maybe Talk to hillbilly4u and get advice on what route he took, assuming your out of powertrain warranty.

Posted

Yup the piston/ring job fixed my oil issue. And 8 new spark plugs were included :)

 

They charged me 80 bucks for plugs. Said mine were in good shape and GM wouldn't pay for them. Can't figure out how the rings were stuck from carbon but the plugs were fine.

 

did you get it back in piece?, how's she run?
Posted

Yup the piston/ring job fixed my oil issue. And 8 new spark plugs were included :)

 

They charged me 80 bucks for plugs. Said mine were in good shape and GM wouldn't pay for them. Can't figure out how the rings were stuck from carbon but the plugs were fine.

 

did you get it back in piece?, how's she run?

 

 

The job only took 3 days. Can't tell any difference in power. The AFM is more pronounced when it kicks in, for some reason. Sounds like a small air compressor under the hood. Could be just a vibration. Have only put a couple hundred miles on it so far, so I can't comment on the oil issue just yet.

Posted

Hillbilly, did you get to see any of the job or get to see the pistons?

 

 

 

Yeah, I saw the heads off and some shiny new pistons. Anyway, I've put 300k so far and no consumption. By now, after an oil change the oil would have already turned color. Checked it today and it was still honey colored.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Mine is an 07 with the 5.3 and AFM. I use Mobil 1 or Penzoil Synthetic oil with a Wix oil filter. I changed my oil this weekend with 5000 miles on it. When I drained the oil into the pan, I put it back into the one of the old oil bottles. It filled the bottle back to just over 4 quarts. It takes about 6 quarts to fill the truck to the line.

 

I used about 2 quarts in about 5000 miles.

 

 

WOW! I can not believe what I'm reading!!! I've read all these post twice and am in shock! I have an 08, 4.8 with 23,600 and no leaks so far. I've read leaking at less tha 12k which is unbelievable! I don't even know what a AFM is but do know my old 94 Z-71 with a 350/5.7 which has been around since 1967. My old truck never burned any oil with over 200,000 miles!! it leaked a little from the rear main and valve covers but never burnt oil. I've been a Chevy guy since the 60's and hope I never have to buy a Dodge or especially a Ford but this is scary!! Maybe I need to sell it and buy another older Chevy truck with another 350 in it. The tranny went at 120k but the engine was great. Actually my old truck was a lot tighter than my new one!!

Posted

Any one else that had the piston and ring job, get plugs included?

 

 

They put in 2 plugs, because they had broken them off. That was at 75K, and I know the manual doesn't call for new ones 'til 100K.

 

Anyway, I've now got 15K miles on it since the pistons + rings, with no consumption. I've got about another 18K miles of motor warranty left from the extension they gave me. If it hold oil that long, I'll got ahead & keep it.

 

FC

  • Like 1
Posted

I've got a 2009 Silverado 1500 CC with the 5.3 Aluminum block\ and AFM

 

I've got the noisy lifters issue.

 

Used 3 qts of oil starting from an oil change at 42000 miles until the other day when I brought it back to the dealer.

 

Getting a crummy 14mpg in mixed drivng with it leaning more towards highway driving.

 

Some hesitation a times after letting off the gas and getting back on it a little.

 

My dealer has been great so far, they have acknowledged the lifter noise as being an issue. He is going to start an oil consumption test, but with the truck at 49000 miles right now, it should not use any oil at all between oil changes.

 

We will be starting the oil consumption test tomorrow, and I am going to go over the TSB's for the truck with the dealer to find out which ones may be applicable. We both have the goal of wanting to do any teardowns only once. I am hopefull that they will implement all the TSB's for the lifters and oil usage during this teardown.

 

How many of you guys were given new engines after having everything replaced failed ?

 

If you're engine was replaced what kind of warranty did you get on that engine ?

 

Has anyone noticed any difference in the MPG they are getting once the consumption issue had been fixed ?

 

When GM extended the Power Train Warranty how long or how many miles did the extend it by ?

 

Thanks

 

Frank

Posted

New lifters, pistons, rings and all things associated with those jobs will be covered for the full PT warranty, at least that's the way I understand it (I had all those done). Also the way I understand it (correct me if I'm wrong) is if you have PT work done at 99,999 miles, those parts are warrantied for another 12K.

 

I dont think they will replace the engine unless the block is somehow damaged. My MPG's did not change from pre-work to after work, as a matter of fact they are really good with the BBP tune I have and the AFM off.

Posted (edited)

Sixathome,

 

What are your MPG before and after tune ???

 

I'm averaging 14 MPG with GM 20inch tires 275/15/r20

 

Thanks

 

Frank

Edited by frankycjr
Posted
Some hesitation a times after letting off the gas and getting back on it a little.

 

 

That is called torque management and has nothing to do with oil consumption.

Posted

Sixathome,

 

What are your MPG before and after tune ???

 

Thanks

 

Frank

 

It really depends on how I drive I guess, The DIC before the tune was like IIRC read on avg 17 ish and now maybe 15 ish or so maybe higher. It can really do good on highway driving with the tune and AFM off, probably like 18's.
Posted

I had the same issue with my 2009 Silverado 1500 pick up. They changed the rings and pistons under full warranty. Oil consumption is ok. After 5k I am down about a quart. Gas mileage is at 14 mph highway and/or city. They say its normal. I didnt do anything to the AFM. Not sure I would know how and if it would void warranty.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,914
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    AidenVorpagel
    Newest Member
    AidenVorpagel
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 636 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...