Jump to content

Fast, Safe, Stick...


2k2TahoeSS

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is there such a thing as a fast manual tranny car that is SAFE, moderately big?  Im not talking 200 hp fast, im talking 300 hp fast.  I have been trying and trying to think, and just cannot think of any.

 

Ben

Posted
I don't think the 5 series is really a big car...it's about the size of an impala.  I think it's about the biggest car with a manual tranny though.
Posted

I'm almost postive you can get an Audi S8 (sport version of a regular A8) in a stick...and thats over 300hp.

 

I have to mention that had to take a couple deep breaths when I saw "Impala" & "M5" together in a catagory as mentioned above.  They might be somewhat close in physical size, but that's it....the M5 is truely a beast of its own.

 

 

EDIT:  As of now, the S8 is not spec'd with a manual tranny.  But, however, VW is introducing a new flagship vehicle which will use or atleast be an option with certain engines.  Here is some info about this beast of a vehicle.

 

VW Phaeton sport sedan

front1.jpg

 

Information about this vehicle

VW Phaeton article

 

I love my truck & GM....but when it comes to technology (engineering), they are way behind companys such as VW and Audi.... just look at their new "W" engines....its a work of art!  And you want to talk about some serious diesel engines, just look at their lineup.....just amazing!

 

Ok...my $0.02 has run out....  :(  I'll crawl back under my rock....LOL!

 

Eric

Posted

The cars you are asking about are EXTREMELY expensive.

 

AMG has the S55 with a touch-shift fully controllable automatic 5-sp tranny and 500hp

Posted
Wait a year or two, the GTO and then eventually Impala, Monte Carlo, and new Malibu will come with LS1's and 6 speeds.

Hells yeah, brutha!  :thumb: Depending on what my income is gonna be at the time the GTO comes out: Im planning on buying one... If I cant afford 'er then i still can always fall back on a nice used '01 or '02 LS1 F-body...

Posted
I have to mention that had to take a couple deep breaths when I saw "Impala" & "M5" together in a catagory as mentioned above.  They might be somewhat close in physical size, but that's it....the M5 is truely a beast of its own.

:( Don't worry, I was only comparing physical dimensions and why I thought the M5 wasn't a "big" car. :flag:

Posted

I don't think the 5 series is really a big car...it's about the size of an impala.  I think it's about the biggest car with a manual tranny though.

Dang, How big are we looking for here? Like a '70's Lincoln Continental  :D The M5 is a bit bigger than an M3.

 

I can't wait for that GTO to get here. Hold me back.

Posted

Thanks guys.  One problem though.  I refuse to drive a german car.  Personal sentimental reasons...I was thinking of the 04 GTO, or 95 Jaguar XJS, found one that is V12 and is going for about 10g.  The only problem is its not stick. :D  Arg.  This search is a bitch...

 

Ben

Posted
I told the G/F that she will be trading in her Malibu for a GTO.  She then complained that she couldn't drive a 6 speed, to which I said "You're going to learn!"  :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The filtering to wear relationship goes like this:      'Relative Engine Life "Factor" new divided by the factor old. So 8/3= 2.67. That result is the multiplier thus if a motor had an effective life of 100K using a filter with a 45 micron rating at a Beta ratio of 75 then a filter with a micron rating of 10 at a Beta of 75 would improve expected engine life to 267,000 miles.    Wear metals are an indirect indicator. Less is better and the motor lives longer but there isn't a multiplier like there is for filtration so well documented. Most of that has to do with the sensitivity of the wear metals tests themselves. The read a 'slice' of the spectrum but not the absolute values for the entire spectrum. So a general indicator that is used WITH the results of other tests. Two others considered in this post.    There is also the influence of corrosive wear which may be seen in the wear metals but separate from load based or viscosity mitigated indication. It's a small graph but the gray line is wear vs the TBN/TAN crossover. Not as useful as it used to be as there are now new chemistries for acid remediation that don't show up in standard UAO testing. They will catch up or be found liars. Only two possible outcomes, eh?             
    • One thing that comes up over and over is that the torque converters are the weak link. Many of the failed transmissions have the same thing in common. The torque converter grenades and then metal torque converter shards end up destroying the transmission. One of the best things you can do is if your transmission is still fully functional, change out to one of the aftermarket billet torque converters. There are several good choices mentioned in different threads here to make your choice. After that, then you can decide about trans tuning. My trans failed at around 95,000 miles. It got replaced under the GM protection plan. The remanufactured trans comes with a 100,000 mile /3 year warranty. I still have just under 1 year left. So far, so good. As long as it's still working good next year, an aftermarket torque converter is going to get installed early spring. If the trans and OEM torque converter fail by then, I will get it replaced under warranty and immediately have an aftermarket torque converter installed. A warranty replacement trans of a replacement trans will no longer have the warranty so I will bulletproof it from the get go.
    • You got'a be cooking right now. Just looked at the weather map. Yuck!    We are right back to $4 today.    
    • Pushing $4.00 a gallon in most places, still $3.75 in town but it's going to spike tomorrow for sure.   Diesel back up to $4.60-5.00.
    • I really appreciate the response.  I guess I was confused about torque angle vs torque angle yield.  The individual bolts don't have a warning on reuse but the part number for the LCA nuts does.   Regarding the purpose of the moog grease fittings on their bolts .. Guessing to reduce possibility of corrosion locking the cams or seizing to the bushing inserts.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...