Jump to content

Dodge 1500


tanked_darren

Recommended Posts

Posted

You weren't ummm...drinking or smoking anything were you? :) I find 28 mpg out of a gas dodge highly unlikely!

Posted

Ive heard this commercial too, if that 400horse hemi gets 28MPG Ill eat my hat. Dodge has always had horrid mileage, gas engines anyways.

Posted
28 miles per imperial gallon, not the US gallon.

 

 

Thats US gallons, we dont use imperial gallons in Canada. Even then, that wouldnt make it better.

Posted

I've seen window stickers on F-150s with imperial MPGs listed. And it would make it better because the gallon is of course bigger and a mile is still a mile. If the commercial was using US gallons, they were BSing. No way any Ram gets that high of a MPG rating.

Posted
I've seen window stickers on F-150s with imperial MPGs listed. And it would make it better because the gallon is of course bigger and a mile is still a mile. If the commercial was using US gallons, they were BSing. No way any Ram gets that high of a MPG rating.

If it was a Canadian advertisement then it would very likely be an Imperial gallon which would enable you to see a higher number as the American gallon is 128 fluid ounces and an Imperial gallon is 160 fluid ounces. So that would bring you to a little over 23 miles per American gallon. I'm assuming this was an est. for highway mileage?

Posted
I've seen window stickers on F-150s with imperial MPGs listed. And it would make it better because the gallon is of course bigger and a mile is still a mile. If the commercial was using US gallons, they were BSing. No way any Ram gets that high of a MPG rating.

If it was a Canadian advertisement then it would very likely be an Imperial gallon which would enable you to see a higher number as the American gallon is 128 fluid ounces and an Imperial gallon is 160 fluid ounces. So that would bring you to a little over 23 miles per American gallon. I'm assuming this was an est. for highway mileage?

 

I can't recall what channel it was on so I have no idea if it was American, but I just caught it when they said "There a reason more people are going with dodge" or something to that effect.

 

 

And than it said 390HP and then 28 MPG.

Posted

Yeah i cant see them having that much hp. My buddy has a 08 dodge halfton thats chipped and suppose to have 420hp. It doesnt seem that much more powerful then my 6litre

Posted

You must have truly browsed that commercial, its on the website and I have also seen it on tv, it had all three trucks, chevy dodge and ford all racing or drivin through the desert dirt or W/E it is, and he's talking about mileage, and on the small print it says 20mpgs, in the large bold white print, it also says 20 mpgs with 390 HP so you might wanna check the commercial again,

Posted
28 miles per imperial gallon, not the US gallon.

 

 

Thats US gallons, we dont use imperial gallons in Canada. Even then, that wouldnt make it better.

 

 

Uh try again.. Canadian MPG advertizements are calculated using Imperal gallons. Thats why a Canadian window sticker lists a 1500 Sierra at 30MPG

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,694 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...