Jump to content

Telescope.


nonstop

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm looking for a telescope for the wife (not for spying on neighbors).

 

Anyways leaning towards a reflector, type.

It'll be mainly used in rural areas.

 

Just wondering if anyone has any luck actually seeing stuff.

Posted

My son has a Bushnell (he's ten).  About all we check out with it is the moon, because things move way too fast across the horizon.  Heck, even the moon is only in the viewfinder for about a minute or less.

 

I know they make some adapters for them, that will automatically adjust the telescope to follow the horizon.  I'm 99% sure they are battery operated so you can be out in a middle of a field and use it.

 

I'm sure I could see Saturn and the other planets with his telescope with no problem, but I don't know where to look...

Posted
Nonstop, I am also looking for one so if someone here has any ideas let us know.  It's funny how people who drive the same type of trucks also have so many other intrest alike.
Posted
I have two. My 10 year old has a basic Bushnell also, but dad has to have the big reflector scope. Shaners is right, things really move across the night sky. There are alot of controllers out there, I suggest getting one that is designed for the scope you eventually get. Also don't be like me and get the biggest one you can afford right off the bat. The more expensive ones have lot of power but not a real big field of view. So things go out of view real fast. Sky watching is a pretty cool hobby to do with your kids, just be prepared to share the scope once in a while :chevy:
Posted

I just thougt of this:

Good Shuttle site-http://www.unitedspacealliance.com/

 

 

Other good NASA sights:

 

http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/realtime/jtrack/Spacecraft.html

 

http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/RealTime/JTrack/

 

look at the J-Track and J-Pass info on the last two--you can put in your GPS positon and know exactly when the Space Station, Shuttle or other satellites will overfly you. There is at least one basketball-sized college experiment covered with mirros that you can see, also. Just look around there.

Good luck.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The filtering to wear relationship goes like this:      'Relative Engine Life "Factor" new divided by the factor old. So 8/3= 2.67. That result is the multiplier thus if a motor had an effective life of 100K using a filter with a 45 micron rating at a Beta ratio of 75 then a filter with a micron rating of 10 at a Beta of 75 would improve expected engine life to 267,000 miles.    Wear metals are an indirect indicator. Less is better and the motor lives longer but there isn't a multiplier like there is for filtration so well documented. Most of that has to do with the sensitivity of the wear metals tests themselves. The read a 'slice' of the spectrum but not the absolute values for the entire spectrum. So a general indicator that is used WITH the results of other tests. Two others considered in this post.    There is also the influence of corrosive wear which may be seen in the wear metals but separate from load based or viscosity mitigated indication. It's a small graph but the gray line is wear vs the TBN/TAN crossover. Not as useful as it used to be as there are now new chemistries for acid remediation that don't show up in standard UAO testing. They will catch up or be found liars. Only two possible outcomes, eh?             
    • One thing that comes up over and over is that the torque converters are the weak link. Many of the failed transmissions have the same thing in common. The torque converter grenades and then metal torque converter shards end up destroying the transmission. One of the best things you can do is if your transmission is still fully functional, change out to one of the aftermarket billet torque converters. There are several good choices mentioned in different threads here to make your choice. After that, then you can decide about trans tuning. My trans failed at around 95,000 miles. It got replaced under the GM protection plan. The remanufactured trans comes with a 100,000 mile /3 year warranty. I still have just under 1 year left. So far, so good. As long as it's still working good next year, an aftermarket torque converter is going to get installed early spring. If the trans and OEM torque converter fail by then, I will get it replaced under warranty and immediately have an aftermarket torque converter installed. A warranty replacement trans of a replacement trans will no longer have the warranty so I will bulletproof it from the get go.
    • You got'a be cooking right now. Just looked at the weather map. Yuck!    We are right back to $4 today.    
    • Pushing $4.00 a gallon in most places, still $3.75 in town but it's going to spike tomorrow for sure.   Diesel back up to $4.60-5.00.
    • I really appreciate the response.  I guess I was confused about torque angle vs torque angle yield.  The individual bolts don't have a warning on reuse but the part number for the LCA nuts does.   Regarding the purpose of the moog grease fittings on their bolts .. Guessing to reduce possibility of corrosion locking the cams or seizing to the bushing inserts.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...