Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

OK, after driving with new gear ratio for about 4-5 hours on both highway and around town I have went from 17-19 average on highway to 14-16 depending on where my foot is at. In the city I was 13-16 and that has not really changed.

It seems like the throttle cable,if it had one which it does not, has been shortened and much less effort is needed to get up to speed. I mean you just barely have to breath on the gas pedaled to reach 30-60 mph. On the highway 65-75 is nothing.

Before anyone ask,yes I did recalibrate me gear ratio setting and it is dead on with my Garmin navigation in the truck. It's just hard to believe the difference as I was already really impressed with my trucks performance.

I figure once I am adjusted to the new gearing my mpg will get somewhat better, not what I had but better.

Edited by txmuder
  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Loving my 6.2l more and more everyday so over the weekend this guy that lives in the same town approaches me and wants to race again the first race we had was against his eco boost i won and that was that well it was nice over the weekend so he brought his pride and joy out a 91 chevrolet camaro with the police interceptor package in it and wanted to run the quarter against me in that with it not being a ford it didnt bug me whether i lost or won but the 6.2l pulled it out at the end and won hell yes he got me off the start but i pulled around him in third gear was an awesome end to the weekend

  • Like 1
Posted

Just found this forum. Love it. Had a 09 5.3 cc, 3.42 4x4 BBP tune. Stumbled on a '12 w/6.2 NHT,3.73. Factory GM CK988 rims. Same exact truck, just 3 years newer , less miles, and the magnificent and wonderful 6.2!! Wasn't really looking but it was sitting at a Ford dealer. Pulled the trigger back in Nov. Already did the BBP tune on the new one. Wow. This thing is amazing. Justin at BBP is the man! Totally recommend him! My mileage has been a bit lower than what has been reported on here, could be the -20 temps we have been having here in MN. Learned a ton from this forum. Just got done reading all 49 pages. Thanks guys.

Posted (edited)

I will get some pics up as soon as the sloppy salt filled Minneapolis roads clear up. BTW, today was the first day above 40 since sometime last November…dry roads, one of the first times I have really been able to let this thing gallop…me likeee.

Edited by super6
Posted

Been averaging just under 10 MPG running E-85 with a BB E-85 tune. Of course this is in the winter with all city driving including a few non intentional burn outs :pimp:

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Has anyone put on or seen that gibson now offers a 4in. exhaust system for our pickups. Anybody have any info on it

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I've read not quite half of the 48 pages and ran outta time so I'll just ask:

 

What is factory HP /TQ rating of L9H running E85?

I know 403 and 414 running premium 91 but could not find the E85 numbers.

 

What power numbers have some put down with BB E85 tune on stock or bolt on truck with L9H?

Posted

I have never seen official e 85 numbers

 

 

Ryan

Posted

From looking at the 6.2 file for my 2013 6.2 I would guess you would lose power with E85. WOT timing advance is actually reduced in the 6.2 file vs. an increase in the 5.3.

  • Like 1
Posted

From looking at the 6.2 file for my 2013 6.2 I would guess you would lose power with E85. WOT timing advance is actually reduced in the 6.2 file vs. an increase in the 5.3.

 

That's odd. The 2014's have published numbers from GM showing power numbers with both fuels. E85 results somewhere between 15-20+ higher both HP and TQ

Posted

We are talking about the L9H here

 

 

Ryan

Posted

We are talking about the L9H here Ryan

 

I understand, sorry to get off topic.In my original post in this thread I was asking for E85 power numbers from the L9H and got sidetracked.

 

Still hoping someone has the information and will post.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...