Jump to content

Windows 8


Recommended Posts

Posted

Recently I've tried out a few different machines with Windows 8 on them. To be honest, I don't really like it. I don't see what the point of the tile screen that replaced the start screen is. Yes, I realize it's laid out for use on a touch screen, but why not put it somewhere else, other than the start button? Navigation once in the touch screen layout is actually confusing to me, and I'm good at interfaces.

 

Windows 8 does seem to be faster, think how fast it would be if they'd left out the tile screens, which often contain feeds that I'm assuming would hinder performance. Someone told me the #1 program for Windows 8 so far was a "start screen" that was similar to previous versions.

 

What do you guys think of it?

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

It boots faster. And I spend most my time on the windows 7 style desktop

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR MAXX using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2

 

 

Posted

+1. Use the "win 7" desktop for mouse/keyboard combo. The tile interface works well for touch.

Posted

Do you mean the Windows 8 start screen? I'm personally running Win7 on everything, so I can't really "miss" it yet. I've worked on Win8 a little, and changed one to "Win7 mode" as a test. I've become more efficient w/ Win7 than *anything* prior, but that's on traditional desktop/laptops. I don't want to change, which is a first. Win8 tiles work much better for touch, but maybe a guy could learn to get work done on it too. I haven't yet played w/ a Surface, but have a few touch laptops.

Posted

In windows 8, if you press what used to be the start button, it takes you to the tile screen. I like how everything is a button away in 7, just press start and there's everything.

Posted

In windows 8, if you press what used to be the start button, it takes you to the tile screen. I like how everything is a button away in 7, just press start and there's everything.

 

OK... got it. I haven't used it enough to try customizing the new UI to what I'm used to. A nice feature of Win7 was the ability to dock applications to the taskbar or start menu. Even so, I use Rocket Dock (free) for quick access to most stuff. I have it set to the left side of screen, and to auto-hide. Works great.

Posted

My daughter's got Windows 8 on her laptop.

 

After my first attempt to use it I finally realized that I'm getting older.

Don't like the tile screen.

 

so long

j-ten-ner

Posted

I'm getting used to it, but 99% of what I do is through the desktop. I too miss the classic Windows Start menu, but I'm sure there is a way to configure it.

Posted

Maybe they'll release a "Windows 8 Frill Free" that will exclude the tile screen in favor of a traditional start menu. I would like the faster boot times of Win8, I'm just not interested in the tile screen for my laptop.

Posted

You need to spend the time customizing it I don't have it but I've used it definitely sucks right away IMO

 

 

Sent from your truck via Tapatalk

Posted

I have win 8 on my laptop and like it, however I am running startisback to get my start menu back and "hide" the tile interface from even appearing unless I want it to. With it set up this way it functions just like a win 7 computer, but with noticeably faster performance.

Posted

I found a Laptop last night that I would like to buy, but it has Windows 8 on it. Anyone know if you can downgrade to Windows 7?

Posted

If you happen to have a copy of it laying around maybe. But I wouldn't mind buying a machine with Win8 because of the 2 posts above yours. As long as I have a start menu I'm happy, and it is faster from what I've seen so far. Hopefully it doesn't rot like Vista did.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,889
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    smandy
    Newest Member
    smandy
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 527 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Holy s**t - not much of a parts thrower you say? You BLASTED that thing with the parts cannon!  You'd have been probably $1,000 ahead if you had just brought it to a competent shop rather than shotgunning a bunch of parts it clearly didn't need.   Just FYI - oil additives are really, REALLY good at ONE thing ... and that's emptying your wallet. They're ALL useless gimmicks.   If that has the L94 or L99, then #7 is an AFM cylinder. I'd suspect a failed lifter in that case.   If you leaned on wiring, sensors, and/or connectors while changing the oil, you'll have to check all that to be sure pins didn't get pulled out, connectors broken, etc.. Old wire loom that was barely adequate when new is certainly brittle by year 19 - make sure wires aren't chaffed and shorting out somewhere where you might have leaned. or supported yourself on it.   If your a mechanic, why didn't you just find out what you were missing and troubleshoot from there??  TIMED spark, fuel PSI / injector pulse, air, compression.  Can't make ANY money going the parts cannon route.
    • LOL! Are you joking?? That wax SUCKS! 100% gimmick made to "look" good.    After just TWO winters I had severe surface rusting in patches over 90% of the frame. Only reason it looks great in the pics is because I SATURATED the frame every single fall with used motor oil for 14 of the 16 years I owned it. Otherwise it would've been sent to the crusher 8 years earlier with the speed it was rusting prior!    I sold that POS 3 years ago. Was a gigantic headache the second it rolled off the showroom floor. Brakes pulsated on the TEST DRIVE. Door trim fell off the 1st week! Interior squeaked and rattled, and the drivetrain clunked after 2k miles. 4x4 switch failed shortly after. Front end - ball joints, struts, hub bearings - all failed between 38k-50k. Engine started burning oil at 50k. Rear and and transmission failed before 100k. Nothing but problems, and frustration with the piss-poor engineering designed to make you give up. Well, it worked! Nothing on that truck was easy to remove ... except the wheels. They haven't figured out how to screw that up yet. Give 'em time ...   I won't make that mistake again. EVER.   Such fond memories ... https://postimg.cc/K1qf23tS  https://postimg.cc/gallery/X02z64J  https://postimg.cc/gallery/mHSRXZv  https://postimg.cc/gallery/D4mMRfL
    • Different monitors do their test only under conditions specific to that monitor.  you MIGHT find the drive cycle conditions for the monitor that isn't ready on this site: https://lemon-manuals.la/   If it's not there, then it should be on alldata.com for your truck, but it requires a paid subscription.   And you need to know which specific monitor isn't ready.
    • from another thread   Update...although the truck sometimes seems to idle weird and the transmission shift a little weird, I've driven about 7,000  miles and no issues.   However, the way GM has handled my rental reimbursement, the situation when my truck quit, and the recall in general has led me to this point...I have driven a GM vehicle for the past 46 years and unless I buy a C3 Corvette, this is the last GM vehicle I will ever own. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...