Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all!


Hopefully I am posting in the correct spot. I have a 2002 Chevrolet Avalanche that I am replacing the front brakes on. The front pads are EXTREMELY tight. I was barely able to get the right inner pad on (had to hit it with a hammer a few times), but the left side will NOT go on with both pieces of hardware... When I took off the old pads the inners were stuck and the wear pattern was odd (grove on the outside edges).


My question is, could this be a half year and could I be using the wrong pads? I am using the Autozone duralast gold DG785 pads.

 

Please halp!


Thanks!

Posted

Did you compress the caliper piston(s) back into the caliper? If not use a c-clamp and push the piston back in. If you have 2 pistons on your calipers make sure you press them both in at the same time. Use the old pad as a bridge across both pistons and put the c-clamp in the middle. When you are all done with your brake job you will have to "pump" the brake pedal to get the pistons back out to where they should be.

  • Like 1
Posted

I was able to compress the pistons no problems, it's just the actual fitting of the new pads into the caliper bracket. They are ridiculously tight, like really really tight on the inners. There is no way there are going to budge or slide away from the rotor and I'm afraid I'll have premature wear again (the pads I replaced had tons of life left, just bad wear patterns..).

 

I've done a lot of brakes (worked at a shop for a bit) and was always able to slide in the pads by hand and able to move them back and forth. Please help :)

 

! Thanks!

Posted (edited)

Go back to Autozone & have another salesman look up the PN# , then have him pull another new set to compair against. Maybe yours are the wrong ones??

 

I come up with that same PN# for a 1/2ton 4x2 and 4x4.

Edited by Bad Bowtie2
Posted

Never fails when I go to Pep Boys they always give me the wrong part. Do what BadBowtie2 said.

Posted (edited)

I agree with bad Bowie2. Hopefully they just gave you the wrong ones. I also looked up the front pad part number for an 03 avalanche and it is the same as a 02, 4x4 and 2wd. This leads me to believe you don't have a "half year" truck that needs a different pad.

Edited by Ramin258
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I talked to their tech support, apparently 2002 is the first year for the Avalanche. Both the 2WD and 4WD take the same pads as well as the 2003 model. The only different one is the 2500, but it's certainly not that.


I did have them swap out all four pads when I was doing the first wheel for the same reason. Was able to get that buttoned up but the inner on that one was tight as well. The pads are very similar to what came out, but the ones that came out were too tight as well.


GOod idea though, I'll bring the old pads to a few places to see if I can see any visual differences. Ugh :(.

Posted

I agree with bad Bowie2. Hopefully they just gave you the wrong ones. I also looked up the front pad part number for an 03 avalanche and it is the same as a 02, 4x4 and 2wd. This leads me to believe you don't have a "half year" truck that needs a different pad.

I think you're right, I'll post a picture hopefully tonight. There literally is no room for two pieces of hardware on the driver side, the top of the pad hits the steel of the caliper bracket without the top hardware. It's crazy. I'll definitely try a few more pad sets, that's literally the only thing I can think of.

 

You guys are great, thank you for the replies. If you think of anything else please let me know. I have truly never seen this happen (brake pad not fitting super easy) unless it was a half year vehicle(worked at Merlin's here in Chicago for 6+ months and did tons of brake jobs) so it's really perplexing.

Posted

You live in Chicago? Sorry our Red Wings are putting the smack down!

:)

Posted

Just read a post on here from 2006. A guy had the same issue you are having with an 02 silverado. No one provided any insight to fix the problem, just stated a bad brake design by GM. They were also stating that their inner pads wore much quicker than the outers. 02 silverado uses the same pads as the avalanche. Maybe try a different brand/auto store to see if you can get a better fit.

Posted (edited)

I have had this happen several times with Duralast pads on different vehicles. I always just take a die grinder to the pads until they slide smoothly. I've never had a problem doing that. Just make sure you lube your hardware to keep them from squeaking.

 

Edit: The backing of the pad is a cast steel piece that is not machined. There are bound to be variations in the casting.

Edited by aflesch
Posted

Ramin, hilarious :D. Im not much of a hockey fan so I didn't even know what the series was at. I'll be sure to relay your sentiment to my co-workers here at the office.

 

Aflesch, that would work for sure... just a tad nervous about it haha. :D

Posted (edited)

Brand doesn't matter in this way. Every set of pads that I install in a caliper bracket like the trucks or my cars needed to meet the grinder before they would move freely. Just grind and install.

Edited by Notamember
Posted

Clean the corrosion from the caliper bracket behind the shims. Does not take much corrosion to bind the pads. Lube behind the Shims also to help prevent further corrosion.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 267 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Enjoy the new truck, it’s a beauty. I’m glad you’re keeping the OBS, I love those old trucks. 
    • With large equipment or deep mud it is more of a use the higher gear to avoid spinning tires, getting stuck because of spinning tires and doing damage to your machine. The idea is if you run out of torque before you spin tires you can still downshift for more torque. If you are just spinning your tires in the lowest available gear you are stuck and things break.   Automatic transmissions, traction control and electronic transfer cases change the calculation a little as you the driver have less control over each piece. 
    • are there any codes? with lots of rust, perhaps disconnect/clean both sides of the connection/examine cable ends (the wires) for corrosion going into the sheath & replace if necessary/reconnect ALL the power AND ground cables between the battery, engine, frame, cab, fuse box and starter charm.li (website) has a no-start diagnostic procedure you can work through to get it working.
    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...