Jump to content

PCV Catch Can Question?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok for me, and anyone else that could use this information I need a little bit of help. I Installed my catch can over the weekend, but the way I ran the lines compared to the way others have ran them has me confused. I have the Mike Norris Unit, and I currently have the line that runs from the PCV Valve in the Intake Manifold into the fitting on top of the catch can lid. Then I have the line running from the fitting on the side of the catch can over to the valve cover. Is this the right way? Seems like everyones setup I look at has the lines running a different way. I'm looking for mine to be done the CORRECT way. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

That sounds correct to me

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Posted

No offense Daryl but the confusion is how you are wording what you are trying to explain. The 3rd sentence into your post says "I currently have the line that runs from the PCV Valve in the Intake Manifold into the fitting on top of the catch can lid". That statement makes no sense. Pics would also help us understand if you are not articulate enough to explain it but please understand, I am not making fun of you. I am just pointing out where the confusion is.

 

The PCV valve, (which is not a valve anymore, just an orafice) is the plug that you see on the rear driver side valve cover, NOT on the intake manifold. The plug that is located in the middle of the intake manifold, is where the PCV gasses enter the intake.

 

To explain it as simply as possible, connect your hose to the plastic tubing that comes from the plug on the rear driver's side valve cover into the top of the catch can. Then run a second hose from the side of the catch can up to the hose in front of the plug that you see in the middle of the intake manifold. :thumbs:

 

 

 

 

 

See my post here, post# 51 for some detailed pics.

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/152695-jegs-pcv-oil-separator/page-4

Posted

No offense Daryl but the confusion is how you are wording what you are trying to explain. The 3rd sentence into your post says "I currently have the line that runs from the PCV Valve in the Intake Manifold into the fitting on top of the catch can lid". That statement makes no sense. Pics would also help us understand if you are not articulate enough to explain it but please understand, I am not making fun of you. I am just pointing out where the confusion is.

 

The PCV valve, (which is not a valve anymore, just an orafice) is the plug that you see on the rear driver side valve cover, NOT on the intake manifold. The plug that is located in the middle of the intake manifold, is where the PCV gasses enter the intake.

 

To explain it as simply as possible, connect your hose to the plastic tubing that comes from the plug on the rear driver's side valve cover into the top of the catch can. Then run a second hose from the side of the catch can up to the hose in front of the plug that you see in the middle of the intake manifold. :thumbs:

 

 

 

 

 

See my post here, post# 51 for some detailed pics.

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/152695-jegs-pcv-oil-separator/page-4

 

 

Makes sense to me, but I'm not the best at explaining things to other people so let me see if I can clear it up some. As of now I have a line coming from the top of the can over to the intake manifold, and a line going from the side of the can over to the drivers side valve cover. They are the opposite of how yours are routed in the picture below.

 

IMG_0791_zps6055ae67.jpg

 

 

Now, I did have mine routed exactly like your's are, but I swapped them to the way they are now because I read in the link below that it could be hard on the engine? Check out posts 51,52,53 in the link below.

 

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=284219&highlight=apex+chase&page=3

Posted

Inlet air to top fitting from fixed orifice

 

Outlet air side fitting to intake manifold port

 

Your engine setup is different from what is being discussed in the thread you linked. No worries.

Posted

Inlet air to top fitting from fixed orifice

 

Outlet air side fitting to intake manifold port

 

Your engine setup is different from what is being discussed in the thread you linked. No worries.

 

 

That's the only thing that had me second guess how I had it hooked up the first time which was the right way to begin with. I thought the setups might be different between the two engines, but I just wanted to make sure mine was right so I don't have any issues.

 

I have it routed back to the correct way now. Thanks for the help everyone.

Posted

Glad you got it figured out. The way you had it before was definetly wrong. The Mike Norris unit gets high marks for collecting the oil well without restricting the flow of PCV gas. You are doing a good thing for the longevitiy of your engine.

Posted
Glad you got it figured out. The way you had it before was definetly wrong. The Mike Norris unit gets high marks for collecting the oil well without restricting the flow of PCV gas. You are doing a good thing for the longevitiy of your engine.

 

Me too. Thanks for the help. I'm glad I got one on finally, and idk if it's because of the can or not, but my gas mileage has gone up slightly. Guess I'll see if it keeps improving.

Posted

Great, keep us posted with your results! Now for internet forum law # 26, POST PICS OR IT DIDNT HAPPEN!

 

 

:lurk::smash:

 

 

Posted

Nice! By the way, who thought up that ingenious mounting location for the catch can? Musta' been a really smart guy!

 

Oh wait a minute, it was me! :cool:

Posted
Nice! By the way, who thought up that ingenious mounting location for the catch can? Musta' been a really smart guy!

 

Oh wait a minute, it was me! :cool:

 

Lol no argument here. It's a great location for easy access, and a clean look.

Posted

I think it would be easier to just label the lines with what they do. Suction and vent. Easy to tell which is which as well, just start the engine and see which one has vacuum, the other is the vent. Doing it this way makes it work for every vehicle out there, without any confusion.

Posted

Nice! By the way, who thought up that ingenious mounting location for the catch can? Musta' been a really smart guy!

 

Oh wait a minute, it was me! :cool:

Would have been even smarter if he had used metric bolts in the existing threaded holes instead of using standard and breaking them off......

 

 

:)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My nephews 7.3 got noisy right around 100K miles. While replacing the engine he drove his old 6.0 Chevy that had over 200K miles on it. It an old reliable backup. I haven’t been around the old shop lately. I’m curious to find out if there using the new GM heavy duty gas.
    • I don't know if you or anyone enjoys it or not but, why not share it. It's GM "truck" related and we're in the right place to discuss that 😉 I'm also working on some creative writing skills, I'm not quitting my day job to pursue that, either!   As I said, I've hit a wall because I'm not making any progress, and the progress is the fun part for me.   The idler pulley and EGR valve came in. Against better judgement, I went out there last night and put both of them in. I was able to get a nut on the back of the bolt on the side with the broken flange. There's enough flange still there that I can get that side of the EGR to snug down. It's not perfect, it's not "right", but this is the fix I have for now. If I decide to keep the rig, I talked to a guy locally who will sell me a complete intake for $100. If it's my truck, a broken flange like that would bug me too much. Yes, I'm crazy. But I embrace it.   Pulley on, EGR installed, started the truck. Great...still have a pulley squeaking like mad. That was the first disappointment. I thought I had pinpointed the problem. Before I replaced it, I sprayed the back of that pulley with PTFE and it would shut up for about 30 seconds. Is the squeak actually the belt? I'm frustrated.   SO then I decided why not disappoint myself twice, so I took it for a spin and sure enough, the CEL set for P0401 insufficient EGR flow again.   I had some extra time, so when I arrived home, I decided to ask AI about my EGR code. We had an interesting conversation.   I asked how to tell if my MAP sensor is bad and if that could be setting an EGR code since a bad MAP may not be sensing the requisite drop in manifold pressure when the EGR activates. I gave it the MAP value at idle and it told me to blip the throttle hard and watch the MAP reading. It said no, the values appear normal and it's reactive to pressure changes, and then instructed me to test voltage at the harness. I don't think it's the MAP sensor. Interesting, though, I gave it MAP reading values in inHg, and it thought I was using PSI, so I had to correct it. AI is a very dangerous tool if you aren't treating it like the machine that it is.   Then it walked me through testing the EGR and harness. It took me down an interesting path. It was referencing a gray wire and a white wire so I told it I can't tell the difference on my harness because it's dirty and old and both could be white or gray, I'm not sure. So it gave me a more accurate description of the ABCDE pins on the connector and started referencing pins instead of colors. Helpful.   The EGR harness has 12v power, and it also has 5v reference power from the PCM. What I'm unclear on is there's a ground wire and I thought AI had said that one of my tests revealed the ground in the harness was likely bad and it instructed me to wire a test ground. I got distracted and navigated away from the AI conversation, and when I went back and asked for clarification it said I must have misunderstood. (how rude- next time I'm saving the conversation!)   But I think it was onto something. I recall NOT getting 12v when I tested the power wire to the ground wire, but I did when I tested the power wire, grounding the voltmeter to the engine block. AI said no, the ground wire is actually for the PCM, that's how it commands the EGR on by grounding it and so the circuit should be open with the key on (i.e. EGR off). But I think there's also a static/overall ground that should always be grounded, and if that's bad, then the EGR isn't activating when the PCM commands it on, and thus setting the code.   There's a bunch of other tests it suggested, back-probing with the EGR plugged in and engine running. I need to get some time to focus, and not just tinkering after a long day.  
    • the 7.3 lifter issue is real, not few and far between.  my 6.6 gas does not use oil.  the 7.3 with 4.30 gears pulled hills better and felt better off the line. the 6.6 gets the job done though. mpg sucks
    • are you talking about the loud whooshing, grinding type noise? mine does it too
    • I am a huge fan of the Slate.  (SUV for her, base pickup for me.)  Unfortunately, there are no plans to sell in Canada but maybe this will change.  I think if/when Ford offered a high range. EV Maverick, it would be my first choice.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...