Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 hours ago, zikronix said:

It's there I can vouch for it that's the part number I ordered. That diagram isn't showing it but it is there.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

5aa81a32e239b_consoleparts.thumb.PNG.6891fc39ff9df0fde96c320ef71edabe.PNG

 

So, with my part numbers I do not need to order the armrest assembly or rear trim plates?

Posted

Does anyone have the part number for the 2018? I know there's a difference in the wireless charging lids between the 2017 and 2018. Would like to get the 2018 version. I spoke with GMPartsNow who gave me the part number 84288040, but I don't think this is right.

Posted
Does anyone have the part number for the 2018? I know there's a difference in the wireless charging lids between the 2017 and 2018. Would like to get the 2018 version. I spoke with GMPartsNow who gave me the part number 84288040, but I don't think this is right.
I don't think that module can be found in the complete consoles. Idk

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Posted
5aa81a32e239b_consoleparts.thumb.PNG.6891fc39ff9df0fde96c320ef71edabe.PNG
 
So, with my part numbers I do not need to order the armrest assembly or rear trim plates?
I don't know because I'm unfamiliar with that part number I can only speak to the part numbers that I ordered and what I received

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Posted
1 minute ago, zikronix said:

I don't think that module can be found in the complete consoles. Idk

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

 

Didn't you say your's came with the wireless charging lid? 

Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, FourThor said:

 

Didn't you say your's came with the wireless charging lid? 

It did but it came with the older style single coil version 2 module not the updated 3 coil module which is in 2018 trucks.

 

None of the parts houses ive seen can filter 2018 parts. Its highly likely that you cant get 2018 complete console with the updated 2018 wireless charger

Edited by zikronix
Posted
3 hours ago, Scott Fish said:

I ordered yesterday morning and my order was cancel in the afternoon due to back order and no date.

that sucks!

Posted

I contacted GMPartsNow.com..

 

For any one wondering, this is what us included in part #84017260 center console in cocoa.

 

(all parts in blue)

5aa96528b9f11_consolepart.PNG.97e327c3ae089daecab6c80ec99d3795.PNG

Posted
well I ordered it today , we will see what I receive and what else I will need to order.
Johnny01: when you receive your order could you please let me know what came with the console.? I'm about ready to order one for my LT Z71 2016 CHEVY SILVERADO. THANKS.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Posted
Johnny01: when you receive your order could you please let me know what came with the console.? I'm about ready to order one for my LT Z71 2016 CHEVY SILVERADO. THANKS.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk


My order was canceled. They claim a backorder from gm with no eta I’m having a lot of trouble finding one. They claim one in Texas 210 681 4900. Part 84017262. They want 200 to ship it to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I finished my console swap last night fully. Only thing is wireless charging isn't working. Maybe it's my phone but I have no idea yet

  • Like 1
Posted
I finished my console swap last night fully. Only thing is wireless charging isn't working. Maybe it's my phone but I have no idea yet

You’ve got the new 2018 module? Or what came with the console?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
I finished my console swap last night fully. Only thing is wireless charging isn't working. Maybe it's my phone but I have no idea yet

You’ve got the new 2018 module? Or what came with the console?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
28 minutes ago, pgamboa said:


You’ve got the new 2018 module? Or what came with the console?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No clue what the console.is even out of 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 563 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...