Jump to content

4wheeler or side by side?


STINSAN3

Recommended Posts

Posted

It depends on how you want to ride. 700 Grizzly has good power from the low end up to the midrange and kinda falls flat at top end. The Outlander will definitely be faster. Sounds like you really want the Can-am. I was looking at a used 850 Sportsman recently at a local dealer and sat on it and thought, man this would be nice. But 8K for a used machine is simply not in my budget but I wish it was. I think the power is just about equal to the 800 outlander. I remember one of those comparison videos Polaris had and they raced the machines for a certain amount of time, 10 seconds I think. The 850 sportsman and the 800 outlander was a dead heat with the 700 grizzly being several quad lengths back. Not sure if the 850 sportsman or Kawasaki Brute Force were on your list but that's 2 more that you could possibly consider. You really can't go wrong with any of them, they're all great machines.

 

Yeah man you're right on the Outty. Hopefully I can get it on Wednesday, if not I'm probably just gonna get the Grizzly. Grizzly probably be more durable, less problems, and pretty fun. I hear a lot of people say, the Grizzly would be perfect if it had about 20 more HP or so. It's hard to say no to all that power Can-Am has.

 

I'm not interested in the Polaris. Some things I don't like. Look cheap looking and that big shifter looks stupid. Brute Force is a solid machine. Great low end power/torque. I just hear the suspension is not too good.

 

Sometimes you're better off buying new instead of used. Specially if it's 7K or more.

 

You never know I might get something else. If I did, might it'd be a Brute. I've came off Hondas. I love their toughness. Their new Foremans are pretty sweet looking. Just wish they add more power to it.

 

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

  • Replies 163
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Yeah man you're right on the Outty. Hopefully I can get it on Wednesday, if not I'm probably just gonna get the Grizzly. Grizzly probably be more durable, less problems, and pretty fun. I hear a lot of people say, the Grizzly would be perfect if it had about 20 more HP or so. It's hard to say no to all that power Can-Am has.

 

I'm not interested in the Polaris. Some things I don't like. Look cheap looking and that big shifter looks stupid. Brute Force is a solid machine. Great low end power/torque. I just hear the suspension is not too good.

 

Sometimes you're better off buying new instead of used. Specially if it's 7K or more.

 

You never know I might get something else. If I did, might it'd be a Brute. I've came off Hondas. I love their toughness. Their new Foremans are pretty sweet looking. Just wish they add more power to it.

 

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Yeah that's the thing Yamaha and Honda refuse to up the power output and put in a bigger twin cylinder like the rest. I heard a couple years ago that Yamaha was going to come out with a 950cc v-twin side by side but they have only came out with the Viking which still only has a 700cc single in it. You can probably get a new brute force for around 8k or so, maybe less if you find a leftover 2013 model. One thing about the brute force is that is weighs quite a bit less than the outlander so the power to weight ratio is probably pretty close. The one thing I hate about the brute force is that silly diff lock lever that you have to pull back and hold like a brake lever to lock in the front axle. Grizzly has a diff lock button and outlander has the visco lock which automatically progressively locks the front axle.

Posted

Yeah that's the thing Yamaha and Honda refuse to up the power output and put in a bigger twin cylinder like the rest. I heard a couple years ago that Yamaha was going to come out with a 950cc v-twin side by side but they have only came out with the Viking which still only has a 700cc single in it. You can probably get a new brute force for around 8k or so, maybe less if you find a leftover 2013 model. One thing about the brute force is that is weighs quite a bit less than the outlander so the power to weight ratio is probably pretty close. The one thing I hate about the brute force is that silly diff lock lever that you have to pull back and hold like a brake lever to lock in the front axle. Grizzly has a diff lock button and outlander has the visco lock which automatically progressively locks the front axle.

 

Yeah I know what you mean man. I don't like that front lever for the Brute for that diff lock. I don't understand why a button is not there or something. I like the Grizzly's 4WD setup is real nice. I might see what I can find on a Brute.

 

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Posted

I may be the only one out there but I really don't mind the lever on my prairie. I guess I've never been stuck in such muck that I'm jumping side to side trying to free myself. If you think about it, how often do you need full lock? Most of my riding is 2wd anyways

 

Sent while drinkin' a cold one...

Posted

I may be the only one out there but I really don't mind the lever on my prairie. I guess I've never been stuck in such muck that I'm jumping side to side trying to free myself. If you think about it, how often do you need full lock? Most of my riding is 2wd anyways

 

Sent while drinkin' a cold one...

Yeah you're right on on that. When do you actually need that diff lock? Mud or going over rocks, logs or steep hills.

Hopefully, I'll have a new 4wheeler by tomorrow evening!!

 

Posted

Yeah you're right on on that. When do you actually need that diff lock? Mud or going over rocks, logs or steep hills.

Hopefully, I'll have a new 4wheeler by tomorrow evening!!

 

I also heard on the Brutes that their downhill brake assist is very prone to failure

 

Sent while drinkin' a cold one...

Posted

Well hopefully I'll be getting a new bike! Waiting on approval on the Outty 800XT. If not, getting the Grizzly.

 

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Posted

Got my new Grizz today!!!4ytamu6y.jpg

 

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Looks good. In my opinion the Grizzly is better in every respect than the outlander except power. I have heard the 2014's do have more power. Same engine, Yamaha figured out how to get more power out of it. Since its the same engine as in the Viking, they needed to do something if they were going to stick with a 700 cc single cylinder or still have a very slow newly designed side by side just like the rhino. I've heard it doesn't help much at top end but low end and mid range are supposed to be noticeably improved. 65 mph is still pretty fast but its not 75-80 like the outlander would do. Probably fast enough for a utility atv anyway.

Posted

 

Yeah you're right on on that. When do you actually need that diff lock? Mud or going over rocks, logs or steep hills.

Hopefully, I'll have a new 4wheeler by tomorrow evening!!

 

I had a 660 grizzly before and there are a few times that diff lock was the difference between making it and winching out. I remember one steep, muddy hill that diff lock was the only way to climb it because where it was, you couldn't just get a run at it and use momentum. Yes, if you don't go through much deep mud, diff lock won't be used much. Honda still doesn't put it on any of their models. They claim their 4x4 system is sufficient without a diff lock option. Id recommend getting a winch if you don't already have one. Even if you don't get stuck, you might need it to pull someone else out.

Posted

I had a 660 grizzly before and there are a few times that diff lock was the difference between making it and winching out. I remember one steep, muddy hill that diff lock was the only way to climb it because where it was, you couldn't just get a run at it and use momentum. Yes, if you don't go through much deep mud, diff lock won't be used much. Honda still doesn't put it on any of their models. They claim their 4x4 system is sufficient without a diff lock option. Id recommend getting a winch if you don't already have one. Even if you don't get stuck, you might need it to pull someone else out.

This model year the guy at the dealership told me they started putting the diff lock on one model to try it out. I forgot which one. My prairie is severely underpowered so I have a winch on it already lol. Don't have to worry about power no more though, I have an Outty!!

 

Sent while drinkin' a cold one...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • There you go again.  Preaching your politics and worse case scenarios.  And what are you doing to make the world less polarized? 
    • Maybe.   Maybe.   I don't want to be the one that needs help and can't get it when I need it. That is a legitimate complaint, and how they respond to those legitimate complaints is a big red flag to me.   I don't care how good the product is their conduct is subpar. Some people are fine supporting that for the sake of getting the product they want. I'm not.   To be fair, I haven't seen or touched their product in person to determine for myself the quality of it. I'm not offering any opinion on that either.
    • So if you do nothing and they act on their threats like death to America or Israel. And possibly a nuclear war. Whoever survives wonders why didn’t they listen? Or we do something like every President has said they can’t get a nuclear weapon. We’re at the 10 yard line and it happens the time is now or never. I think I’m ok with paying a little more for gas for awhile. It’s a shame that we now live in a world that’s so polarized. 
    • 4-5-6 fails due to design.  Not enough clutches and not enough piston to clutch surface area.  Also the backing plate can bow.     I'd say converter is two part.  The design of converter chosen, and factory tuning of it aka slipping it in D (also L6) for AFM purposes, as well as locking it up in 2nd gear, sometimes 1st, also it will partially lock up at light loads.  All because CAFE/fuel economy requirements.  A billet converter on the stock tune might hold up better, but would still be subject to the stock tuning and how its designed to lock or partially lock.     The most baffling part to me, is the 2007-2013 6L80s didn't have the failure rate the 2014-2018 ones do.  I've been where I work for almost 17 years now, and I recall maybe 3 or 4 of the 07-13 transmissions getting pulled for something.  14-18 on the other hand, it was at a minimum one a month being opened up.    If I had to guess, I'd say the tuning for the gen 5 engines/6L80 setup and its fuel economy goals had a good bit to do with it.  Also, it was bankruptcy time during these years, so I'm thinking some cost cutting was done for the launch of the K2XX trucks.  See also now the 10 speed valve body issues (more cost cutting).  They blow out some mesh screen in the spacer plate, undersized check ball, and the feed limit valve was aluminum and wears out prematurely.         I don't think it was the HP jump from the gen 4 to gen 5?  The 6.2 in the 07-13 trucks was good for 380-400hp during its life/states of tune, and the 5.3 did 310-320hp.   
    • All this might be worth it had we actually recovered enriched uranium, a WMD, or an actual nuclear deal with oversight. This is a flub of epic proportion, and they all know it.   $5.10 at a station reporting $4.99 last week. Here we go....
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...