Jump to content

L-86 or 6.2L Emblems for our trucks


GTD

Recommended Posts

Posted

Would anyone else but me wish there was a designation showing what's under the hoods on the 6.2 powered trucks?

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I did when I had my 2011 Silverado 6.2L. I found some on EBay, and added one to the tailgate where the LT emblem was.

 

Sent from my Droid Ultra

Posted

You don't put Ford badges on GM trucks. That's just the rules. :throwup: The Ford guys would laugh at you.

 

There's all kinds of aftermarket Vette and Camaro 6.2 badges. Probably some factory 6.2 stuff as well.

Posted

L86 would be weird.. 95% of the people who see it would have absolutely no idea what that is

 

Shades of late 70's Corvette those with the higher output L-82 high ouput engine carried this emblem on its hood. Would be a throw back, who cares if only 5% knew what L-86 meant, that means their up on there GM history. Yeah maybe 6.2L would be OK but I like the L-86 better--my opinion. Thanks for inputs.

Posted

Would anyone else but me wish there was a designation showing what's under the hoods on the 6.2 powered trucks?

While you're at it, why don't you add some stick on Buick vents to the fenders? Your bubbafied embellishments are going to look real pro...

Posted

While you're at it, why don't you add some stick on Buick vents to the fenders? Your bubbafied embellishments are going to look real pro...

And if he wants to do that who cares? Your not paying his truck loan so he can do what he wishes

 

 

Ryan

Posted

While you're at it, why don't you add some stick on Buick vents to the fenders? Your bubbafied embellishments are going to look real pro...

specfaculous you should keep your own stupid ideas to yourself, who would put the Buick vents as you call them on a Silverado or Sierra?

Posted

6.2L fo sho. No raptor badges

 

IMG_20140409_124618197_zpstlr5jeuj.jpg

Posted

6.2L fo sho. No raptor badges

 

IMG_20140409_124618197_zpstlr5jeuj.jpg

That looks really clean, nice

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hi friends - first time poster. I have a 2015 sierra Denali with 150k miles, I’m the second owner and she’s given me 75k of great service. I run a pulse AFM disable device. Starting Thursday when I exited the freeway after a short local ride it started idling rough, with an obvious misfire shake and was down on low end power.  I got it home and hooked it up to my scannner and found no codes but in live data a pretty bad misfire on cylinder 5. I replaced the coil, plug and wire with all new OE replacements (Delphi gn10165 coil, acdelco wire and 41-168 plug). It’s still behaving the same way after firing the parts cannon at it.   I know cyl 5 is a non AFM cylinder so I am not thinking this is AFM related but I’m kinda at a loss. injector? Bent pushrod? It’s running too well over 1k rpm to suggest those IMO. Has anyone chase this issue before and what was it? Any suggestions? 
    • 2017 Silverado L83 5.3l 6speed transmission Hello, not a new member but havent posted in a while and my old signup info isnt working so had to create a new account. anyways, I have an issue with my truck and hope someone can spread some light on whats happening: -when it goes to 4cyl mode it makes a clunk sound (but not when coasting or going downhill) -when in 4 cyl mode and under load it makes a load pulsating sound (not a tick). -goes away completely when in M5 gear or when plugging in an AFM delete. Im guessing it is one of 2 things but im not convinced of either to be honest. 1. lifter stuck in v8 mode 2. torque converter shudder realistically it doesn't seem like the TC as there is no physical vibration , and it never happens in v8 mode. but maybe? and wouldnt a lifter make a sound whether with load or not? any ideas let me know please. thank you!  
    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...