Jump to content

Cooper, or Toyo


LaserBlueZ71

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok guys, I have to choose.

 

Cooper S/T Maxx

285/65R18

11.80'' wide

32.80'' diameter

63 LB

 

Toyo R/T

285/65R18

11.50'' wide

32.80'' diameter

71 LB

 

Toyo R/T

33X12.50R18

12.50'' wide

32.80'' diameter

75 LB

 

This will be for a 2011 Silverado Ext Cab on a Rancho 4'' lift.

 

The funny thing with the 33X12.50R18 Toyo R/T, is that it is cheaper than the 285/65R18, and it has less weight capacity than the 285/65R18, even though it is a 1 inch wider tire.

 

One number I can't get over is how much lighter the Cooper tire is. Those Toyo R/T's must make the truck feel like a total pig.

Posted

Hmm, I'm running a Cooper AT/3 275/65/18 I think and love it, but I've also ran the Toyo M/T 35' and Toyo A/T my Sierra, honestly, you can't go wrong with either. I'd buy the one that cost less, and it's not perm so if you don't like what you buy then you can buy another brand when these wear out.

Posted

Toyo. If you actually make your mind up to keep it and buy the lift! :jester:

Decided to keep what I have.

 

When I sat down and crunched the numbers, there was no way I was willing to go that much further into debt. I am trying to work my way out of debt, not back in! I need to just stop looking at other vehicles and keep mine for 15 years!

 

The weight of the Toyo's is what's really making me ponder about them. I wonder how bad my fuel economy would get with a heavy 12.50 wide 33? It will take me YEARS to wear out whatever I buy, that's why I want to be happy with what I get. I only put on about 12,000 to 15,000 KM a year. At that rate, I could probably get 5 to 6 years out of a set of tires.

Posted

Definately Toyo based on looks and wear.

Would you get the 285/65R18 or the 33x12.50R18?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 37's would probably fit with a 3" lift. GM only has two gear ratios for these trucks 3.73 for gas and 3.42 for diesel. And they can't be programmed for anything else at the moment. The rough country module just corrects the speedometer and odometer to adjust for tire size it's not a programming device.   You haven't said if your truck is gas or diesel, but for a gas truck the 10L1000 with 3.73 gears has a lower final drive ratio than the 6L90 it replaced would if it were swapped to 4.10s. GM used the same 3.73 gearing in 6 speed gas trucks. I don't think you'll have any issue running 37's with the 10 speed other than the reduction in mpg and towing/weight capacity which is as much of a function of the lift as the tire size.
    • Actually, it probably was the brakes.  It's weird the way the messages came across, but I took it to the dealer thinking that something was wrong with the sensor and in fact, the rear brakes were shot.  What I don't understand is why the messages never said, your brake pads are low.  First I got the message I posted above, taking about new pads being detected.  Then I got a message saying that the system needed repaired.  It never said, change your brake pads.
    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...