Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Personally, I'd rather have a 6.2 in a 1/2 ton than a 3/4 with a 6.0. Many guys love their 6.2s that tow with them. Your trailer is within capability of the 6.2 also. I wouldn't even consider a gas 3/4 ton, gutless and terrible MPG, but that's just me. Now if you're think diesel, I say go for it. But, ultimately I believe the 6.2 max trailering would fit the bill fine.

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Matt you never mentioned what other options are important to you. Are you looking for completely loaded with every option? When compairing the 1500 vs 2500 there are several things (already mentioned) the 2500 will have standard for much better towing (assuming you tow a fair amount).

 

When I bought my 2500HD Denali I knew I wanted something with ALL the bells & whistles and that was capable of what-ever I needed of it. Before buying I did compare it with a 1500 Denali with the 6.2. I picked the HD over the 1500 knowing the 1500 had more HP and a smoother ride but the 2500HD will tow anything I will ever tow and stop what ever I tow with out being concerned and the price was equal MSRP on the same optioned trucks. I never even considered a DMAX due to price (that's a lot of miles to drive to get that money back).

 

As for MPG, best I've seen is 16.5 during warm months and 9.5-11 during the cold months (most days I put ~10 miles on so that hurts my MPG) My BIL has a '14 2500HD DMAX and gets 14-16MPG and 22-24MPG on the Highway. His truck is kept inside a heated garage so no warm-up time when at home (lucky bastard)

Posted

Matt you never mentioned what other options are important to you. Are you looking for completely loaded with every option? When compairing the 1500 vs 2500 there are several things (already mentioned) the 2500 will have standard for much better towing (assuming you tow a fair amount).

 

When I bought my 2500HD Denali I knew I wanted something with ALL the bells & whistles and that was capable of what-ever I needed of it. Before buying I did compare it with a 1500 Denali with the 6.2. I picked the HD over the 1500 knowing the 1500 had more HP and a smoother ride but the 2500HD will tow anything I will ever tow and stop what ever I tow with out being concerned and the price was equal MSRP on the same optioned trucks. I never even considered a DMAX due to price (that's a lot of miles to drive to get that money back).

 

As for MPG, best I've seen is 16.5 during warm months and 9.5-11 during the cold months (most days I put ~10 miles on so that hurts my MPG) My BIL has a '14 2500HD DMAX and gets 14-16MPG and 22-24MPG on the Highway. His truck is kept inside a heated garage so no warm-up time when at home (lucky bastard)

I am in the market for a Danali, I could go 1/2ton or 3/4, they are the same money, I am picking the truck with the big guts under it for the same money. When did a 1/2ton start costing $56,000...

Posted

Personally, I'd rather have a 6.2 in a 1/2 ton than a 3/4 with a 6.0. Many guys love their 6.2s that tow with them. Your trailer is within capability of the 6.2 also. I wouldn't even consider a gas 3/4 ton, gutless and terrible MPG, but that's just me. Now if you're think diesel, I say go for it. But, ultimately I believe the 6.2 max trailering would fit the bill fine.

I would rather have the 6.2/8speed myself but I need a real chassis under it, a 1/2ton will get its ass kicked trying to pull heavy. There are guys out there that are over heating the trans on the 1/2tons.

Posted

Matt you never mentioned what other options are important to you. Are you looking for completely loaded with every option? When compairing the 1500 vs 2500 there are several things (already mentioned) the 2500 will have standard for much better towing (assuming you tow a fair amount).

 

When I bought my 2500HD Denali I knew I wanted something with ALL the bells & whistles and that was capable of what-ever I needed of it. Before buying I did compare it with a 1500 Denali with the 6.2. I picked the HD over the 1500 knowing the 1500 had more HP and a smoother ride but the 2500HD will tow anything I will ever tow and stop what ever I tow with out being concerned and the price was equal MSRP on the same optioned trucks. I never even considered a DMAX due to price (that's a lot of miles to drive to get that money back).

 

As for MPG, best I've seen is 16.5 during warm months and 9.5-11 during the cold months (most days I put ~10 miles on so that hurts my MPG) My BIL has a '14 2500HD DMAX and gets 14-16MPG and 22-24MPG on the Highway. His truck is kept inside a heated garage so no warm-up time when at home (lucky bastard)

I am looking at a fully loaded LTZ 4X4. I drive 30,000 miles a year for work. My work does not need a truck, its just what I like to drive. Plus, family vacation in the RV is very important to me and not worrying about if my tow vehicle is capable is important.

Posted

Matt you never mentioned what other options are important to you. Are you looking for completely loaded with every option? When compairing the 1500 vs 2500 there are several things (already mentioned) the 2500 will have standard for much better towing (assuming you tow a fair amount).

 

When I bought my 2500HD Denali I knew I wanted something with ALL the bells & whistles and that was capable of what-ever I needed of it. Before buying I did compare it with a 1500 Denali with the 6.2. I picked the HD over the 1500 knowing the 1500 had more HP and a smoother ride but the 2500HD will tow anything I will ever tow and stop what ever I tow with out being concerned and the price was equal MSRP on the same optioned trucks. I never even considered a DMAX due to price (that's a lot of miles to drive to get that money back).

 

As for MPG, best I've seen is 16.5 during warm months and 9.5-11 during the cold months (most days I put ~10 miles on so that hurts my MPG) My BIL has a '14 2500HD DMAX and gets 14-16MPG and 22-24MPG on the Highway. His truck is kept inside a heated garage so no warm-up time when at home (lucky bastard)

Does he really see over 20 MPG with the DMAX on the highway? Also, would love to see a pick of your C2 :D

Posted

Does he really see over 20 MPG with the DMAX on the highway? Also, would love to see a pick of your C2 :D

I was shocked when he told me his MPG on the Highway :omg: but for another $8500.00 for the D-Max it was not worth it to me as I put on maybe 8,000 miles per year.

 

As for my C2......she is very camera shy :)

IMG_2366_zps79538578.jpg

 

But I did catch her checking on my new truck last summer.

photo_zps5928bc42.jpg

Posted

Personally, I'd rather have a 6.2 in a 1/2 ton than a 3/4 with a 6.0. Many guys love their 6.2s that tow with them. Your trailer is within capability of the 6.2 also. I wouldn't even consider a gas 3/4 ton, gutless and terrible MPG, but that's just me. Now if you're think diesel, I say go for it. But, ultimately I believe the 6.2 max trailering would fit the bill fine.

 

Opinions are opinions...I have a 2015 hd 6.0...not gutless for sure. Gotta love those 4.10 gears... 6.0 is a great engine.

Posted

I was shocked when he told me his MPG on the Highway :omg: but for another $8500.00 for the D-Max it was not worth it to me as I put on maybe 8,000 miles per year.

 

As for my C2......she is very camera shy :)

IMG_2366_zps79538578.jpg

 

But I did catch her checking on my new truck last summer.

photo_zps5928bc42.jpg

Absolutely beautiful. C2's are the ones to have.

Posted

Personally, I'd rather have a 6.2 in a 1/2 ton than a 3/4 with a 6.0. Many guys love their 6.2s that tow with them. Your trailer is within capability of the 6.2 also. I wouldn't even consider a gas 3/4 ton, gutless and terrible MPG, but that's just me. Now if you're think diesel, I say go for it. But, ultimately I believe the 6.2 max trailering would fit the bill fine.

I agree that the 6.2/8-speed combo would be beastly. However, the newer 6.0 gasser is no slouch. 365 HP and 385 TQ with 3:73's or 4:10's is plenty of guts for most people. And, they only get 1-2 mpg less than my current truck.

 

My BIL has a '14 2500HD DMAX and gets 14-16MPG and 22-24MPG on the Highway.

Sorry, but I'm calling BS on that one. I think he's exaggerating a bit because he's jealous that he spent $8000 more on an engine that gets the same MPG as your truck, haha. The newer diesels have tons of power, but don't get the mpg they used to...unless you spend a whole lot of money on them.

 

 

Opinions are opinions...I have a 2015 hd 6.0...not gutless for sure. Gotta love those 4.10 gears... 6.0 is a great engine.

I agree. My dad's old 2011 with 3:73's could blow the doors off my current truck...and his 2015 with the 4:10's is even quicker.

Posted

Sorry, but I'm calling BS on that one. I think he's exaggerating a bit because he's jealous that he spent $8000 more on an engine that gets the same MPG as your truck, haha. The newer diesels have tons of power, but don't get the mpg they used to...unless you spend a whole lot of money on them.

 

 

No need for him to lie or be jealous......and his truck is not totally stock :D If I had his money I could burn mine.

Posted

 

Opinions are opinions...I have a 2015 hd 6.0...not gutless for sure. Gotta love those 4.10 gears... 6.0 is a great engine.

Maybe gutless was the wrong word. However, the current 6.0 has similar power numbers to the current 5.3 correct? The 6.0 is in a much heavier truck. Difference is gearing.
Posted

 

No need for him to lie or be jealous......and his truck is not totally stock :D If I had his money I could burn mine.

I understand. I know a few guys like that too, haha.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • While waiting for parts I have been working on installing the AC compressor, new accumulator, and orifice tube. Also changed out the high side ball valve (original). The orifice tube that was in there wasn't too bad. Slightly dirty, a little bit of junk, but not blocked. Glad I changed it out.   The accumulator, which should have been a 5 minute job, may have just burned $50. Put some PAG in it, wrote the date and mileage on the side, fresh o-rings and gooey'd up the threads and rings with Nylog. Got everything connected and snugged and was going to vacuum down the system, and....   My manifold gauge won't fit on the port. It's not an R12 service port. It LOOKS like an R134 service port but the diameter is a hair too large. There's a sticker on the accumulator that says it's designed to be used with R12 and R134a systems only. So it's not R1234yf. Even if I reduced the diameter slightly with a file, the shoulder on the port is too large so the quick-connect valve won't lock on. I'm stumped. It's going back, and 50/50 on if they'll give me a refund.   Also, I did a fuel pressure test.... Key on, the gauge spikes to about 60psi and quickly bleeds off, like 2psi per second. The fuel isn't going into the plenum, no smell, starts fine, so I'm guessing there's a bad check valve in the pump and the fuel is just draining back into the tank. oh, hell. But, it shouldn't be a problem, pump primes just fine and the truck starts right up. It just means I can't really ever use fuel pressure to verify a leak at the injector or intake.
    • Got this yesterday out of nowhere. Truck is a 25',6.6 gasser with 8k miles.  Only semi anomaly is that the truck had been sitting, uncranked for 6 days. Elec Stability Control showed immediately upon cranking, not while driving. No drivability issues, just the message. Battery didn't seem to be weak when cranking over.  I drove it, killed it, let it sit a few hrs with no avail.  Truck is 100% stock. No damage. 
    • This can be done.  It is not cheap and requires an instrument cluster swap with custom programming, new steering wheel with the controls on it, and a special jumper harness.   The cluster upgrade - 12.3” Digital Cluster Upgrade – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The wheel upgrade - Steering Wheel Upgrade Kit – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The column harness upgrade - 2019 - 2026 Silverado / Sierra: Steering Wheel LIN Bus Harness - Harness Dr. - DIY Done Right     The problem with doing all of this?  You pretty much can't have any programming done to your truck that involves the cluster ever again.  The dealer won't be able to program the cluster as GM's system will only pull data for the cluster the truck came with.  So it would be advised also to turn off over the air updates.   TLDR;  Should have bought an LT double cab?  You'd have a power seat, the wheel controls, the cluster, all things that you've been seeking in your various posts so far about your new WT regular cab.  
    • I was unaware of that, thanks for updating me.
    • Yes.  The 2.7 Turbomax has Active Fuel Management.  It is NOT the same as the V8s.  Totally different system.     Here is an article from GM when the 2.7 came out explaining the cylinder deactivation and the valve lift system.  Starts at the section called "SCS Valvetrain":   New Turbocharged 2.7L 4-Cylinder Engine Powers Full-Size Trucks – TechLink         This is an internet myth going around.  It was alleged that some 5.3s had this mystical 8th digit of the VIN as an "E" which somehow meant it had a new one year only 5.3 that didn't have DFM.  The writer of said article and the person that made the claim conveniently can't count because they posted the VIN.  The 8th digit was a "D" which meant its still the 5.3 with DFM.  The 9th digit of the VIN was an "E" and the 9th digit isn't the engine code.  At all.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...