Jump to content

Test drove a Ram 1500 Sport


nadrojcote

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yesterday when I got off work I had a check engine light on again with a new issue. Some of you that know me on here know I have had a lot of issues with my truck. So being fed up I went and test drove a Ram. It was a used 2014 crew cab sport with heated and cooled leather and half as many KM's as mine. This is what I found.

 

Pros

-cooled seats even though its not a top trim model

-great ride quality

-incredibly throttle and brake response compared to my truck

-nice infotainment system and DIC

-Frame was not rusty like mine was after the same amount of time on the road

-center console seemed nicely finished instead of a big giant hole

-Fuel mileage on the DIC from the previous owners trips was around 12-13l/100km which is better than I expected

 

Cons

-Seats were uncomfortable, I tried to find a position I liked and I couldn't. They also didn't have as much side support to stop you from sliding sideways, like a race seat.

-Felt very heavy and like a 3/4 ton

-even though it had heated and cooled seats, it was missing a sunroof, automatic climate control, dual climate control, navigation and memory seats compared to my SLT

-8 speed shifts a lot, not sure if this was a good thing or a bad thing, but it was different getting used to

-the exterior look is getting a little stale, they could use a refresh or redesign

 

Over all I wanted to love the Ram, but I couldn't. The uncomfortable driving position and exterior look of the truck turned me off. I know lots of people that have had good luck with Ram's lately and I'll consider them in the future, but for now I like the look of my truck and prefer the seats.

Posted

There is some inconsistency in the seats cause I drove two similar Rams a few months apart and disliked one seat and was ok in the other. GM does nicer seats though (at least according to my butt lol). The missing stuff are all options I think.

 

I was real torn between another Chevy and a Ram earlier this year. I ended up with a Wrangler but I was leaning toward a regular cab Sport before I decided to change direction and get the Jeep.

Posted

I just traded my 09 Ram Sport reg cab short box in on a 13 Sierra crew cab. I liked the Ram for power,it was a rocket. I did notice the body panels dented very easy. The rear diff limited slip clutch pack went out twice at $1000 a wack. Talking to some guys on the Ram forums,they said about 20k miles was about all you would get out of the clutches and that's ridiculous.

As for mileage, I averaged 14-15 mpg.

 

The Sierra feels like a higher quality vehicle. Fit and finish just feels better.metal on the body seems to be a heavier gauge,not sure if it is but it doesn't dent when you bump it. With the 5.3, it doesn't have the power my Ram had but I can live with that. I like the feel of the GMC better.

I guess your going to get a bad one once in a while no matter who makes it. I have been buying GM's and Dodge's my entire life and I have to say, I have had better luck with the GM trucks.

Posted

The newer rams have come a long way from the older ones for fit and finish. They're pretty nice, but I did notice there was a a couple small dents in the one I looked at.

Posted

The newer rams have come a long way from the older ones for fit and finish. They're pretty nice, but I did notice there was a a couple small dents in the one I looked at.

Posted

I don't think I have seen one that didn't have a dent or two in the upper box sides. I put a small crease in my door just by touching a 2x4 wall in my garage. I didn't hit it, it was just resting against it while I was getting in. You could push against the body anywhere with your thumb and indent it.

I liked the truck,just thought it should have been better for the money you pay.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

The newer rams have come a long way from the older ones for fit and finish. They're pretty nice, but I did notice there was a a couple small dents in the one I looked at.

Just had a customer of mine come in w 13 Ram w a 5.7. He's been back and forth to the dealer 3 times for a check engine light that won't go away, his seat fell apart and is the second, and his exhaust has a nasty leak and he's taking it to his dealer when he gets back home in Ohio next week... He said his mileage is 12mpg on a good day, and wishes he never traded his 10 Chevy in on it.
Posted

Well that must just be his bad luck because I know lots of people who have been problem free and happy with their Rams. So I would guess that guy got a lemon or he drives it like he stole it. No offence to gm, as I've always loved them, but ram seems to be a more solid, less mass produced truck right now.

Posted

I think the Ram's are beautiful trucks appearance wise, looking at body style.

They have been the best looking truck bodies for years IMO. The problem I have is everything else that comes with it, not that great of a truck. They feel fast and quick compared to the Silveraod/Sierra 5.3L but GM really has their engines detuned from the factory. They also have terrible programming with the throttle body opening. I understand they do it as a "safety" factor so we don't go through parts but their amount of torque management really takes the fun out of the GM trucks. All of that can be fixed with a tune but the throttle response is still not as quick as other manufacturers.

 

The Ram's I test drove had much better throttle response than both of my GM trucks and that makes them feel quicker. The OEM ride of the Ram felt great BUT the trucks I drove had the rear coil spring suspension and that makes a huge difference when it comes to ride quality. That is easily fixed on GM's with a good set of aftermarket shocks.

 

The Ram rear drive system is terrible, their 'limited slip' doesn't work well. I also don't care for the interior design, I am just not a fan of a truck with a center console shifter, they are for cars and SUV's. It seems GM is the only manufacturer left with the shifter where it belongs, on the steering wheel. I would love to have a Ram with the 5.7L HEMI but there are a lot of things they would need to change for me to give up on GM and buy one of their trucks.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Local dealer got 2 in a few weeks ago. The goofy grill looks better in person but I'm still not sure I like the departure from the crosshair grill. Aside from that the truck does have a mean stance. I wish GM would figure out how to grow a pair and do something unique like this.

Posted

I agree completely

 

I'm torn because I like both styles - but for different reasons.

 

The rebel looks more DAKAR super truck rally - where as the original Ram looks like a work beast.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Local dealer got 2 in a few weeks ago. The goofy grill looks better in person but I'm still not sure I like the departure from the crosshair grill. Aside from that the truck does have a mean stance. I wish GM would figure out how to grow a pair and do something unique like this.

Posted

Don't get me wrong, GM makes a nice truck, I've all but given up on thier product design as far as "outside the box" thinking goes. If only GM had the progressive designers that Ford and Ram had, they would be number 1 for sure.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2018 Silverado Custom with 156k on the odometer. In the last month I've replaced the plugs, wires and the driver side engine mount. My wife just returned from a trip of about 1500 miles and told me the brakes are making a grinding noise when applied. I drove it and looked it over and this is what I found with the driver's side rear rotor.   I'm going to order new pads and check about having the rotor resurfaced. Hopefully this is easier than the last 2 jobs.   Peace  
    • Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption?  I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 
    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...