Jump to content

mysterious code 43 problem


Recommended Posts

Posted



i have a 93 gmc sierra 4x4 with a 4l60e transmission and 5.7 engine. originally the truck came equipped with a 4.3 engine but that got swapped out to the present 5.7 engine. ever since ive owned the truck its always had the code 43 flashing on the trouble codes. ive done everything to the original engine to help solve the trouble code but it always came back mysteriously.it continued to do the same thing even after i swapped the engine to the 5.7 it has in it now. the problem that i have now is that the truck will run ok til the engine temperature reaches operational temp then it starts to stall and fumble and when i try to accelerate the engine rpm themotor stalls and eventually dies. at first i thought it wasnt getting fuel to the throttle body, but that wasnt the problem at all. in fact it looked as if it was dumping too much fuel into the throttle body assembly. my first attempt to fix it was to replace the engine coolant temperature sensor, this was a problem before and fixed the problem before so i thought what the hell give it a try. no luck that didnt help at all and now the engine wouldnt even run at all. ive replaced everything electronic that i can think of and the only thing that helped to get the motor was to replace the knock sensor. that got it running but just like ive stated before, itll run just fine til the motor starts to get warm then it starts to falter again. ive read a couple of books to see if i could figure it out that way but the books tell me to replace the ESC module but guess what THERE IS no ESC module where the books state its supposed to be at and some of the online articles ive read state that the ESC is integrated with the PCM. so how do i fix that? ive replace the PCM with another one thats designed to run with a V8. some of the articles have even stated that there could be a short in the wire that goes from the knock sensor to the pcm but tracking that wire has become a real difficult task by itself. it seems as if though the problem has something to do with the distributor, almost as if its not advancing its timing like its supposed to do under normal conditions. for some reason the timing will not advance when the engine reaches normal operating temperature like its supposed to. ive even adjusted the distributor while the motor was running and got it to accelerate normally, but as soon as i shut the engine off and re-start the engine, the same problem returns again. im really flustered with this problem and have asked everyone i know that has some mechanical expertise. nobody seems to know how to fix my problem. now its your turn. lol. just to let you know ive replaced every part that i replaced before just to help eliminate any faulty parts.............hope you can help me solve this problem............................Kevin

Posted

The computer you are using did that come from the vehicle that the engine came from? If not how do you know what PROM to use? When you are adjusting the timing are you disconnecting the spark advance line? Is the computer compatible with your spark advance line? Do you know what kind of temperature the computer is seeing when it warms up. Have you disconnected the EGR valve or blocked it off to see what happens?

Posted

egr is a good idea to see if it is a problem.

 

advancing an engine from 1993..

is there a map sensor working?

 

I still use a 1 bar on an old subaru.. but it is with a very modern msd computer.

 

vacuum leaks can disrupt it.

Posted

Do you still have the original PCM? There will be a label with a long #,maybe seven or eight digits and there will be another label with four letters...can you post those for both PCMs.Duelin is right,you might have a PCM or PROM that won't work in your truck.If the PCMs are the same maybe a PROM swap will work :dunno:

 

I'm wondering if the ICM gets hot and starts doing bad things.

 

Maybe when it's in Open Loop it's fine but once it warms up and goes to Closed Loop it won't run right,hence the PCM or PROM problem.... :dunno:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,837
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    bellssn690
    Newest Member
    bellssn690
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 524 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...