Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been looking and haven't found any similar thread.

 

My 2016 A/T truck is very smooth across the board at all speeds in 2WD mode.

 

So we had the blizzard here in the northeast last week and as the snow has been melting and refreezing, I've been driving in Auto mode.

 

I've started noticing that if I give it medium to heavy throttle, the truck vibrates from 40-50 mph.

 

It's smooth up to to 39 mph, and smooth once I'm up to normal speeds of 65-75 mph.

 

It only happens from 40-50 mph and in Auto 4WD. And never on slow acceleration such as traffic light to traffic light.

 

Anyone else have this? Is this normal?

Posted (edited)

Snow frozen in the wheel

More likely poorly assembled cheap parts.

Edited by pm26
Posted

My '15 DC V6 6-spd does the same thing...in auto 4WD only, it has alot more harmonic vibration in the gas pedal/wheel.

No sign of it in 2WD. This is on dry payment, warm temps, no traction issues, only light/part throttle. It seems to do it from a lower speed, approx.

10-15 mph, then slowly fades as speed increases. Not sure if it does it in regular 4WD, will check.

Posted (edited)

no need to be driving in 4 auto at that speed anyway. the transfer case is meant to shift on the fly.

 

use it to get traction on start-offs. But turn it back to 2wheel once you are above 30mph.

 

No 4 wheel drive system is going to keep you from slipping when at higher speeds

Edited by fondupot
  • Like 1
Posted

Is the Auto engaging/disengaging the transfer case when you 'push it' at those speeds?

 

Does it also vibrate under those conditions in 4H?

Posted

I'd check your front driveshaft to see if it's balanced.

Is that something I can do or the dealer?

Posted (edited)

Is that something I can do or the dealer?

 

Do you have a driveshaft balancing machine in your garage?

 

No?

 

In that case....take it to the dealer.

Edited by fondupot
Posted

Is the Auto engaging/disengaging the transfer case when you 'push it' at those speeds?

 

Does it also vibrate under those conditions in 4H?

So it does it in 4H too. So it's definitely a transfer case related issue.

 

I'll have the dealer look it. Since no one else is experiencing slight vibrations with 4WD engaged.

 

Kind of odd, since I have no vibrations with my truck at all (except AFM related stuff) in 2WD. I can cruise at all speeds and it's butter smooth. No wheel/tire issues.

 

I'm kind of surprised no one else have any kind of slight vibrations with 4WD engaged.

 

I guess the plus side is that I dont really drive in 4WD very often.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

The truck was flawless in 2wd mode. 2 weeks ago.

 

I left instructions on how to duplicate it the shake. I stopped by the dealership the day before I left town so I could ride with the tech. They said they didn't need me to.

 

I came back two weeks later only to find out that they balanced my wheels unnecessarily.

 

There were no vibration issues in 2wd.

 

They said that all 4 of my wheels were 1 ounce off and balanced them for me. I asked them if they could still feel the vibration after the balancing and you know what they said...

 

"We couldn't duplicate the vibration before, so there was nothing compare it to after"

 

WTF....?

 

You didn't test drive the truck before?

 

You just randomly balanced tires that didn't need balancing?

 

The truck drove different in 2wd vs 4wd and not a single damn tech was able to drive it in both modes (auto and 2wd) and tell the difference?

 

Now my truck vibrates on the highway at 75 mph. Which it didn't before. I didn't give a crap if the wheels were out of spec, it didn't shake in 2wd. And it still shakes in Auto mode.

 

Oh...they also recommend I don't drive in Auto on dry pavement. Something I never do.

 

It didnt shale before. Now it does...thanks GMC. If your reading this, your techs are completely incompetent.

 

I am so mad...I must be going to the most circus of a dealership in my region.

 

I walked over to the sales floor and test drove 2 other trucks....guess what. Auto mode from 40-50 mph....smooth.

 

Bet they didn't do that either.

 

God forbid they drive another truck and see of if the issue is common. Oh wait. They drive the truck. They just guessed the issue was a balance.

 

Because that's what GMC professional grade technicians do, guess at repairs.

Edited by SierraMyst
  • 2 years later...
Posted

I've started noticing the same issues with my 15 Silverado. When I first purchased it, All of my driving was in Auto. Now once I get up to around the 50mph mark I get a very evident vibration. I switch it to 2wd and the vibration goes away. Has anyone gotten a resolution for this?

  • 1 year later...
  • 11 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,872 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...