Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

Pinion side shot posted. Looking at it, there is little pointing up which is where it needs to be.

 

 

 

 

Any chance you can attach your camera to the rear axle facing forward? Its hard to tell in the video but it almost looks like there isn't any vibration going on in the drive-line and its all in the body. I'm curious if the same shake will happen in the video if you have it on the axle. I wonder if clamping the springs making them stiffer is helping restrain the vibration;

 

edit: I've had a suspicion for a while a lot of the roughness and vibration is happening from the front and the stiff frame is transferring it to the rear of the truck since it has the least amount of mass.

Edited by ic3man5
Posted

Is this your truck KLRV6?

 

Are you saying the pinion angle is correct and yet you still have the vibe? Just trying to decipher this. Thanks!

Yes it is my truck. The pinion working angle is out of spec. 3.09 degrees difference and it needs to be .25 - 1 degrees. So, a 2 degree shim would make it 1.09 degrees, which is much better than where it is now. If needed and it wouldn't upset the front too much, I can adjust the rest out at the transfer case. It wouldn't take much more to get it around .75 degrees. Yes, it's good to have an angle, but this is way off and it can get enough movement from the suspension moving up and down to keep the u-joints lubricated.

Posted

 

 

Any chance you can attach your camera to the rear axle facing forward? Its hard to tell in the video but it almost looks like there isn't any vibration going on in the drive-line and its all in the body. I'm curious if the same shake will happen in the video if you have it on the axle. I wonder if clamping the springs making them stiffer is helping restrain the vibration;

 

edit: I've had a suspicion for a while a lot of the roughness and vibration is happening from the front and the stiff frame is transferring it to the rear of the truck since it has the least amount of mass.

I already have one of the rear. I'll post it tomorrow. There is so much going on with the suspension.

Posted

Yes it is my truck. The pinion working angle is out of spec. 3.09 degrees difference and it needs to be .25 - 1 degrees. So, a 2 degree shim would make it 1.09 degrees, which is much better than where it is now. If needed and it wouldn't upset the front too much, I can adjust the rest out at the transfer case. It wouldn't take much more to get it around .75 degrees. Yes, it's good to have an angle, but this is way off and it can get enough movement from the suspension moving up and down to keep the u-joints lubricated.

Awesome, thanks for your insight on the matter! Hopefully the shims will help for you! When do you plan on having them installed?

Posted

I already have one of the rear. I'll post it tomorrow. There is so much going on with the suspension.

 

Awesome, looking forward to seeing it.

Posted

Awesome, thanks for your insight on the matter! Hopefully the shims will help for you! When do you plan on having them installed?

The truck is on week three at the dealer. If they don't take care of it. I will once I get it back. They informed me the other day that they have had to keep one of their customers trucks for three months and still couldn't fix the vibe.

Posted

The truck is on week three at the dealer. If they don't take care of it. I will once I get it back. They informed me the other day that they have had to keep one of their customers trucks for three months and still couldn't fix the vibe.

I can guarantee that truck sat in the parking lot for 10 of 12 weeks and just said they were working on it the whole time, ain't no way GM would authorize that much reimbursement for warranty work
Posted

I can guarantee that truck sat in the parking lot for 10 of 12 weeks and just said they were working on it the whole time, ain't no way GM would authorize that much reimbursement for warranty work

They had one that 80 hours was "invested" in and GM paid for 10. I call them every day or two and request a status update. I understand things take time. If they let it sit, that when my tolerance runs out. My truck was there two and a half weeks before they even looked into the complaint I had about the transmission whine.

Posted

So I clamped 5 inches behind the axle. It stiffened it up and bumps feel horrible but it seems to have taken some of the "extra vibes / noise" out of the drive. With clamped behind the axle, what does that do with pinion angle?

 

I am thinking there is lots of resonance coming from the suspension

Posted

So I clamped 5 inches behind the axle. It stiffened it up and bumps feel horrible but it seems to have taken some of the "extra vibes / noise" out of the drive. With clamped behind the axle, what does that do with pinion angle?

 

I am thinking there is lots of resonance coming from the suspension

It will point the pinion down, so more of a negative angle
Posted

 

Awesome, looking forward to seeing it.

Sorry it took so long to get posted. 2015 Silverado rear view at highway speeds

. It was a rough week at work. I did get my truck back and the vibration is gone at highway speeds. I am cautiously optimistic about the repairs being permanent. The dealer performed the transfer case update, replaced ring/pinion and bearings, replaced two rear shocks - one had completely failed and had oil leaking out of the top. This is a non-Z82 truck.

 

I will get another video at the same view with the repairs made.

Posted

 

 

Any chance you can attach your camera to the rear axle facing forward? Its hard to tell in the video but it almost looks like there isn't any vibration going on in the drive-line and its all in the body. I'm curious if the same shake will happen in the video if you have it on the axle. I wonder if clamping the springs making them stiffer is helping restrain the vibration;

 

edit: I've had a suspicion for a while a lot of the roughness and vibration is happening from the front and the stiff frame is transferring it to the rear of the truck since it has the least amount of mass.

I will get one of the camera attached to the axle.

Posted

So what is the verdict on tightening the U-bolts/adding another clamp to the leafs? IMO, the last thing anyone on this forum wants to do is start screwing with the pinion angles and the driveshaft; you'll never get it shimmed just right, and you'll make yourself crazy trying to do it. The pinion angles are also not going to affect high-speed vibration as much as they will affect the low speed shudders. To be honest, I think the fix for these trucks is going to be a custom made one-piece driveshaft, but I have a lease, and I'm not putting that much effort into it.

  • Like 1
Posted

So what is the verdict on tightening the U-bolts/adding another clamp to the leafs? IMO, the last thing anyone on this forum wants to do is start screwing with the pinion angles and the driveshaft; you'll never get it shimmed just right, and you'll make yourself crazy trying to do it. The pinion angles are also not going to affect high-speed vibration as much as they will affect the low speed shudders. To be honest, I think the fix for these trucks is going to be a custom made one-piece driveshaft, but I have a lease, and I'm not putting that much effort into it

 

I am waiting to see if the current repairs have resolved the issue. If vibration comes back, I may take the driveshaft out and have it checked by a specialist.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

I am waiting to see if the current repairs have resolved the issue. If vibration comes back, I may take the driveshaft out and have it checked by a specialist.

what exactly did you do?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 381 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...