Jump to content

GM Reliability and Dependability -New Reports, Mixed Results


Recommended Posts

Posted

post-139450-0-29099600-1456340667_thumb.png

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
2/24/2016

Do you want the good news or the bad news first? Let's do the good news. Buick was the third-ranked premium brand in the just-released 2016 J.D. Power Vehicle Dependability Study. GMC also did well, finishing 5th overall. GM also had the most durable vehicle in the Large SUV category with the GMC Yukon and the top heavy duty truck was the Chevy Silverado HD. Over at Consumer Reports, Buick was ranked seventh overall among the 30 U.S. vehicle brands.

Ready for the bad news? Pricey Cadillac was called "Worst" by Consumer Reports for predicted reliability and ranked 24rth overall. Only Land Rover was lower among luxury brands. Fiat Chrysler, Jeep and Dodge were at the bottom along with Mitsubishi. This is the group Cadillac falls in with. That is not good company for a brand trying to sell a premium product as a fashion accessory. Cadillac does a bit better finishing right at about the average line on the J.D. Power list.

GMC is 23rd out of 30 on Consumer Reports Ranking, and Chevy is 20th. Both brands do much better on the J.D. Power list.

The J.D. Power list looks back three years and has a heavier emphasis on problems like "Can't pair my cell phone via Bluetooth." The Consumer Reports listing is more intensive, and the group both reports the total problems reported on its surveys, and also looks ahead based on the trend over the past years for each brand. You can see the J.D. Power report right here. Consumer Reports is available by on-line subscription, or you can buy the magazine to see the details of its report.

 

 

 

 

 

post-139450-0-29099600-1456340667_thumb.png

post-139450-0-29099600-1456340667_thumb.png

post-139450-0-29099600-1456340667_thumb.png

Posted

I feel like these types of charts could be swayed very easily. The average guy/girl driving their Silverado around and the tire pressure light comes on. They realize it and fill the tire back up to set point. Someone else who cant be bothered to do so or does not have the common sense to open the manual brings it to the shop and that logged "repair" gets jumbled into these reports.

 

Does anyone know how these reports get calculated?

Posted

The JD Power is a bit slanted because it does count all manner of things that is probably people not doing their homework to understand their new vehicle.

 

As for Consumer Distorts, I could give a crap what a bunch of yuppies from Connecticut think about brands. If I want to know which toaster will heat up my pop tart fastest they're great but as a gearhead I can't get behind their strictly analytical rating system for cars.

Posted

Neither are accurate so why bother. But I will show a copy to my neighbor who owns 3 Fords. :noway:

Posted

The JD Power is a bit slanted because it does count all manner of things that is probably people not doing their homework to understand their new vehicle.

 

As for Consumer Distorts, I could give a crap what a bunch of yuppies from Connecticut think about brands. If I want to know which toaster will heat up my pop tart fastest they're great but as a gearhead I can't get behind their strictly analytical rating system for cars.

 

not only that, they have an EXTREME Bias towards Imports (ESPECIALLY Honda and Toyota)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,889
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    smandy
    Newest Member
    smandy
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 571 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Sure, but they do have some affordable options like the Trax, Trailblazer, Envista, and Encore. Some of these have a cheaper base price than the Civic, though the fuel economy isn’t as high. The main problem is that people WANT the highest trim with all the goodies and finance for like 7 years. That’s how ppl “afford” the more expensive vehicles. 
    • Holy s**t - not much of a parts thrower you say? You BLASTED that thing with the parts cannon!  You'd have been probably $1,000 ahead if you had just brought it to a competent shop rather than shotgunning a bunch of parts it clearly didn't need.   Just FYI - oil additives are really, REALLY good at ONE thing ... and that's emptying your wallet. They're ALL useless gimmicks.   If that has the L94 or L99, then #7 is an AFM cylinder. I'd suspect a failed lifter in that case.   If you leaned on wiring, sensors, and/or connectors while changing the oil, you'll have to check all that to be sure pins didn't get pulled out, connectors broken, etc.. Old wire loom that was barely adequate when new is certainly brittle by year 19 - make sure wires aren't chaffed and shorting out somewhere where you might have leaned. or supported yourself on it.   If your a mechanic, why didn't you just find out what you were missing and troubleshoot from there??  TIMED spark, fuel PSI / injector pulse, air, compression.  Can't make ANY money going the parts cannon route.
    • LOL! Are you joking?? That wax SUCKS! 100% gimmick made to "look" good.    After just TWO winters I had severe surface rusting in patches over 90% of the frame. Only reason it looks great in the pics is because I SATURATED the frame every single fall with used motor oil for 14 of the 16 years I owned it. Otherwise it would've been sent to the crusher 8 years earlier with the speed it was rusting prior!    I sold that POS 3 years ago. Was a gigantic headache the second it rolled off the showroom floor. Brakes pulsated on the TEST DRIVE. Door trim fell off the 1st week! Interior squeaked and rattled, and the drivetrain clunked after 2k miles. 4x4 switch failed shortly after. Front end - ball joints, struts, hub bearings - all failed between 38k-50k. Engine started burning oil at 50k. Rear and and transmission failed before 100k. Nothing but problems, and frustration with the piss-poor engineering designed to make you give up. Well, it worked! Nothing on that truck was easy to remove ... except the wheels. They haven't figured out how to screw that up yet. Give 'em time ...   I won't make that mistake again. EVER.   Such fond memories ... https://postimg.cc/K1qf23tS  https://postimg.cc/gallery/X02z64J  https://postimg.cc/gallery/mHSRXZv  https://postimg.cc/gallery/D4mMRfL
    • Different monitors do their test only under conditions specific to that monitor.  you MIGHT find the drive cycle conditions for the monitor that isn't ready on this site: https://lemon-manuals.la/   If it's not there, then it should be on alldata.com for your truck, but it requires a paid subscription.   And you need to know which specific monitor isn't ready.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...