Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So i just had my truck into the dealer yesterday for an oil change since i get 3 free ones and didnt want to pass it up.

 

I was suspicious that they did not rotate my tires because the fronts were still extremely dirty, but i said **** it next time i go down i will make sure they do it.

 

After checking their work today, i am going back and chewing them out. There was oil dripped all under the hood which they did a half ass job wiping up, and the bottom scrape plate under the truck was all covered too because the lazy ****ers just let it drain all over it instead of removing the cover.

 

I also found a leak in the front which appears to be going to lines in my radiator, should be a simple fix?

 

The **** didnt put the bolt back in on that side of the cover, and you can clearly tell its leaking all over yet they told me my truck was A-OK and gave me the papwork to prove it. It took me 2 seconds to spot the leak as soon as i looked under the truck there is no way they missed it.

 

I will let you know how it goes when i go back and read them the riot act.

 

In the meantime, can i just get new hose lines and install these myself, looks like an easy fix?

 

jtOyThm.jpg

KiF4q3m.jpg

d6mnqxu.jpg

4xQHZj7.jpg

 

zthP6L9.jpg

H1j97VQ.jpg

Posted

Why is that not an AC Delco filter as well?

 

My dealer did the same thing on my truck on one of the oil changes, tried pouring the oil in by the valve cover instead of using a funnel and poured it all over the valve cover. Had oil smell in the truck for the next 2 weeks, chewed them out about that and they offered me another oil change for the issue.

Posted

Its not a chevy dealer so i am fine with the other brand filter, its the fact they left oil around which stinks like you said. I am also pissed about the leaking line they clearly identified and hid. I remember which bay they pulled my truck into, if there was no lift, i can pretty much be sure they didnt rotate the tires.

Posted

OP, since you say it isn't a Chevy dealer, what "dealer" did you take it to that gives you "3 free ones"? GM dealer should repair/replace those hoses if under warranty. I believe one of those might be the transmission cooler line which had a recall some time ago to make sure it wasn't leaking...

  • Like 1
Posted

Its a Jeep dealership and this was a trade in there, so i was just getting my free oil and then doing everything myself after that. I will be sure to point out the recall to them and try and get that fixed, then never step foot in there again.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

On the phone with dealer now, they said the recall was already done for that part. Can anyone tell me what the part numbers are for these hoses? The seem to connect to the radiator on the passenger side of the truck, then connect down on the front bottom side of the engine block.

 

Edit - Just got off phone, she said the oil lines were covered under power train but the trans were not, bringing her in this weekend to get it looked at unless i identify the line before then and replace myself if its not the oil one which would be under warranty.

Edited by 1500fp
Posted (edited)

There are 2 lines going to the radiator on the passenger side, one connects on the top side and one of the bottom of radiator. Looks like the bottom one is leaking, which line is that for trans or engine oil?

post-150969-0-49522300-1457562292_thumb.jpg

post-150969-0-49522300-1457562292_thumb.jpg

post-150969-0-49522300-1457562292_thumb.jpg

post-150969-0-49522300-1457562292_thumb.jpg

Edited by 1500fp
Posted

Looks like you need some new transmission cooler lines. The recall for the trans line leak is not for the any other part on the line but the connection at the transmission. They had a problem where they weren't installed correctly. Your leak is the actual crimps where the rubber meets the steel. I'd find your nearest GM dealer and make an appointment for that.

Posted

How much am i looking at? Do i need special tools or can i get this done in my driveway? Thanks!

 

How many miles are on your truck? Should be under powertrain warranty.

Posted (edited)

about 50k, i called dealer last night and they said oil lines were covered but trans were not. I guess i should at least bring it in for them to check, worst they say is its not covered. I bought it used with about 40k on the clock, and dont abuse it or town anything, all easy driving with mix of backroad and highway driving. I do take it on dirt roads now and then but not much since its still winter.

Edited by 1500fp
Posted

Take it to a Chevrolet dealership, should be covered under warranty.

Truth! Stop taking it to that dealership where you got it from, take it to a Chevrolet dealership like DCazares suggested, they'll run the VIN and do the proper recalls/fixing.

Posted (edited)

Hate to add salt to the wound, take the brand vehicle to same brand shop! Non-GM techs working on GM vehicles equals the carnage you showed us in the pics. <- (there are exceptions to this rule, but its a "best practice's" & common sense. Not sure if you know this, but automotive technicians are generally paid by the amount of work they produce known as “flat rate” compensation. So speed of completion is beat into them, quality work not so much.

 

BTW you have lots of rust starting to form on your frame, by the looks of it you must have a northern vehicle with all that salt & that engine bay is filthy! TLC

 

The selling dealer should have sent the vehicle over to GM to have the recall's preformed before selling you the truck, most states its illegal to sale a vehicle with a open recall.

 

lastly, why would you return back to the Jeep dealer after something like this? just lick your wounds and move on. Free oil change.... nothing is free!

Edited by camcamaro1991

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,741 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...