Jump to content

Replacing Tires on my truck.


flyboyron

Recommended Posts

Posted

With my 09 Silverado now over the 60,000 mile mark and still with the stock tires, I think it's time to be looking for new tires.

 

You can see by the picture next to my post, that I have the 20" Chrome Clad rims with the stock tires.

 

I was thinking that I would like to put just a little larger tire (higher sidewall) to make the ride a little softer.

 

I read that you don't want to increase the tire size more than what will change your speedometer by around 1%.

 

Any ideas what size tire I should go with to get just a better ride, or should I maybe consider the same size tire but a different brand?

Posted

That's a ton of mileage for a stock tire! A little more sidewall would be a 275/60R20 and should fit with no modifications. With that tire size in a Toyo AT2 my speedo says 60 and I am really going 62, no biggie. Can't go wrong with Toyo/Nitto setup, good luck!

Posted

That's a ton of mileage for a stock tire! A little more sidewall would be a 275/60R20 and should fit with no modifications. With that tire size in a Toyo AT2 my speedo says 60 and I am really going 62, no biggie. Can't go wrong with Toyo/Nitto setup, good luck!

Flyboy, Ryan's suggestion shouldn't cause you any problems. And the two Mph differental is no biggie either. Btw, presumably you know that the "55 or 60" height numbers represents the percent of tire width. Example; width 275 X 60 percent = 165mm or about 6.5 inches. I concur that stepping up one size is probably harmless and btw that's all reputable tire dealers will do anyway. But, I'll give you two think-abouts; a taller side wall don't necessary give you a better ride whatever that means as there's lot of other variables in tire design and structure that will influence ride. Second, a taller tire being of a larger diameter requires more energy (fuel) to turn it and also will inhibit performance whether towing or coming off the line at traffic lights with urban cowboys and their Hemi's, !

Posted

Flyboy, Ryan's suggestion shouldn't cause you any problems. And the two Mph differental is no biggie either. Btw, presumably you know that the "55 or 60" height numbers represents the percent of tire width. Example; width 275 X 60 percent = 165mm or about 6.5 inches. I concur that stepping up one size is probably harmless and btw that's all reputable tire dealers will do anyway. But, I'll give you two think-abouts; a taller side wall don't necessary give you a better ride whatever that means as there's lot of other variables in tire design and structure that will influence ride. Second, a taller tire being of a larger diameter requires more energy (fuel) to turn it and also will inhibit performance whether towing or coming off the line at traffic lights with urban cowboys and their Hemi's, !

Thanks Snoringbear, as I was reading your reply I remembered, that years ago I had put a next size larger tire on my motorcycle, (which back then the speedometers actually ran 2 - 3 mph faster than they should) anyway, this tire did correct my speedometer, but also reduced my gas mileage. I noticed when I switched back to a stock tire that I got about 3 mpg better mileage. Not a lot on a motorcycle, but it does make a difference.

 

My Silverado has the 3:73 rear end so I would imagine that could drop my mileage down below 16 mpg.

 

Thanks, I may end up keeping the same size tire since I don't want any less mileage.

Posted

I just went out and measured the tires. I actually have 5/32 total left, including the 2/32 of wear bar area.

I checked the Goodyear website and it says these Eagle LS2 20" tires come with 11/32 tread.

So I think in 60,000 miles these are just a little more than 1/2 way worn.

I would only expect to get another 10,000 miles because I believe they wear faster as they get worn down.

Posted

Good God. You must live in the desert with no rain or snow. I hit 40000km or 25000 miles and couldn't stand the lack of traction on the good for a years

 

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk

Posted

As stated, a 275/60/20 would be a nice upgrade. And, if you stay with a P-rated tire, then your MPG shouldn't change much at all. The P-rated tires ride a lot better than the LT's too.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I would argue that GMPartsDirect has that info wrong.    The service manual for R+R the lower arm and for adjusting camber/caster, none of the steps say to discard and replace the nut or the bolt.    The only part that gets discarded is the plastic cam adjustment retainer that is in the eccentric from the factory.     The LCA nut torque spec is: First Pass: 180 Y (133 lb ft) Final Pass: 90 –105 Degrees    
    • The filtering to wear relationship goes like this:      'Relative Engine Life "Factor" new divided by the factor old. So 8/3= 2.67. That result is the multiplier thus if a motor had an effective life of 100K using a filter with a 45 micron rating at a Beta ratio of 75 then a filter with a micron rating of 10 at a Beta of 75 would improve expected engine life to 267,000 miles.    Wear metals are an indirect indicator. Less is better and the motor lives longer but there isn't a multiplier like there is for filtration so well documented. Most of that has to do with the sensitivity of the wear metals tests themselves. They read a 'slice' of the spectrum but not the absolute values for the entire spectrum. So a general indicator that is used WITH the results of other tests. Two others considered in this post. Trending is very important.    There is also the influence of corrosive wear which may be seen in the wear metals but separate from load based or viscosity mitigated indication. It's a small graph but the gray line is wear vs the TBN/TAN crossover. Not as useful as it used to be as there are now new chemistries for acid remediation that don't show up in standard UAO testing. They will catch up or be found liars. Only two possible outcomes, eh?             
    • One thing that comes up over and over is that the torque converters are the weak link. Many of the failed transmissions have the same thing in common. The torque converter grenades and then metal torque converter shards end up destroying the transmission. One of the best things you can do is if your transmission is still fully functional, change out to one of the aftermarket billet torque converters. There are several good choices mentioned in different threads here to make your choice. After that, then you can decide about trans tuning. My trans failed at around 95,000 miles. It got replaced under the GM protection plan. The remanufactured trans comes with a 100,000 mile /3 year warranty. I still have just under 1 year left. So far, so good. As long as it's still working good next year, an aftermarket torque converter is going to get installed early spring. If the trans and OEM torque converter fail by then, I will get it replaced under warranty and immediately have an aftermarket torque converter installed. A warranty replacement trans of a replacement trans will no longer have the warranty so I will bulletproof it from the get go.
    • You got'a be cooking right now. Just looked at the weather map. Yuck!    We are right back to $4 today.    
    • Pushing $4.00 a gallon in most places, still $3.75 in town but it's going to spike tomorrow for sure.   Diesel back up to $4.60-5.00.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...