Jump to content

Part number for black '17 all terrain grill??


TT32VGT

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just bought a slt and I want to change out the grill to a black painted all terrain.. anyone have the part number??

 

I wouldnt mind seeing the denali too, if ya have the part number for it?

 

many thanks!!

Posted

Do you mean the grille "surround" painted outline part, they do separate btw, I would love to have a OEM onyx surround one for my Denali. I am not sure they sale them separate I believe you have to buy an all-terrain grille and have it paint matched. http://www.ebay.com/itm/23258406-2016-2017-GMC-Sierra-1500-OEM-Unpainted-Front-Grille-NEW-/282148443417?fits=Year%3A2016%7CMake%3AGMC%7CModel%3ASierra+1500&hash=item41b15b9519:g:JoUAAOSwaB5Xvesl&vxp=mtr

 

 

around the 3.23minute mark shows the grill in sections. Too much black for me but food for thought.
Posted

You will have to paint the grill surround to match, they don't come painted when you buy them thru the dealer.

Posted

Anyone have a part number??

 

It looks like the inner part of the all terrain grill is the same as my slt?? Thought it was different.

 

I think im just going to get my guy to wrap the chrome front and rear bumpers, top part of mirrors, and the grill surround.

  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 1/14/2017 at 1:15 AM, TT32VGT said:

Anyone have a part number??

 

It looks like the inner part of the all terrain grill is the same as my slt?? Thought it was different.

 

I think im just going to get my guy to wrap the chrome front and rear bumpers, top part of mirrors, and the grill surround.

 

23258406

 

The inner part is actually not the same. The AT is what I call Black Chrome (darker) and there are 4 vertical supports behind the cross bars SLE and T are 6.

 

Sorry to necromance this topic. 

Posted

I used black Plasti-Dip'd on my grill surround, insert and hood scoop.  

IMG_2083.thumb.jpg.3efc6875eba76459f6e693e0509d5afe.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,863
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Bulldogger
    Newest Member
    Bulldogger
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 828 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way too big headlights (similar to a previous non-Wrangler SUV) should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crossing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...