Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I have seen only threads about people plasti dipping (or covering with vinyl) the GMC emblem covering the red area and keeping the chrome. Personally, the less chrome on my truck, the better. I have a matte black 2016 Sierra ATX and I think the red goes good with it.

 

Has anyone plasti dipped the chrome and kept the red area exposed?

 

Picture attached I thought I would just take some left over matte vinyl I had and wrap the "C" quick to see what it would look like with the red exposed and chrome covered. I like it. I might go this route with my emblems.

post-163421-0-33778500-1488083862_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-33778500-1488083862_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-33778500-1488083862_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-33778500-1488083862_thumb.jpg

Edited by AllTerrainX
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I did this with my chrome on the outside of my "GMC" logo. Only difference is, I wrapped my letters with black carbon fiber.

post-155249-0-45816500-1488085570_thumb.jpg

post-155249-0-74219700-1488085607_thumb.jpg

post-155249-0-45816500-1488085570_thumb.jpg

post-155249-0-74219700-1488085607_thumb.jpg

post-155249-0-45816500-1488085570_thumb.jpg

post-155249-0-74219700-1488085607_thumb.jpg

post-155249-0-45816500-1488085570_thumb.jpg

post-155249-0-74219700-1488085607_thumb.jpg

Edited by Number1Lusta
  • Like 2
Posted

I did this with my chrome on the outside of my "GMC" logo. Only difference is, I wrapped my letters with black carbon fiber.

 

 

That looks sharp! Great job.

 

Dipping the chrome should be easy. You kind of have two options: One is to just spray it all and peel off the red parts after. It should tear pretty cleanly on the lines. The other option is to use green painters tape, but the pin striping stuff, and cover off the red, leaving just the chrome exposed for dipping. That's my 2 cents on the dipping method.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I recommend the following:

 

1. Take off the emblem

2. Use a dremel on the back side of the emblem and pop the letters "GMC" letters out

3. Plasti-Dip the chrome (all of it, that way you don't have any edges that can snag)

4. Use glossifier (If you want a glossy finish)

5. Put the letters back in (I used 3m automotive tape)

 

Take your time, you'll be much happier with the results.

 

Also, I attached my first attempt, which was without popping out the letters. I peeled it off and redid it. I have been through the automatic wash about 10 times now with no issues.

post-155249-0-02951200-1488086128.png

post-155249-0-02951200-1488086128.png

post-155249-0-02951200-1488086128.png

post-155249-0-02951200-1488086128.png

Edited by Number1Lusta
  • Like 1
Posted

I have seen only threads about people plasti dipping (or covering with vinyl) the GMC emblem covering the red area and keeping the chrome. Personally, the less chrome on my truck, the better. I have a matte black 2016 Sierra ATX and I think the red goes good with it.

 

Has anyone plasti dipped the chrome and kept the red area exposed?

 

Picture attached I thought I would just take some left over matte vinyl I had and wrap the "C" quick to see what it would look like with the red exposed and chrome covered. I like it. I might go this route with my emblems.

 

 

Hope this is close to iridium......

 

post-163421-0-33778500-1488083862.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

 

 

Hope this is close to iridium......

 

post-163421-0-33778500-1488083862.jpg

Thanks VTBulldog - if I had photoshop I would have done the same thing :) This gives me a better idea!

Edited by AllTerrainX
  • Like 1
Posted

Bought some Plasti Dip and first time using it and I LOVEEEE the "GMC" logo now. This stuff is awesome. For the AT emblems, I attempted to score and peel the red area and it didnt come off good, so I will have to mask off the red area and try again.

 

Here is the "GMC" emblem

post-163421-0-76065200-1488163434_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-76065200-1488163434_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-76065200-1488163434_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-76065200-1488163434_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Finally got one "All Terrain" emblem to come out good with the Plasti-Dip. So I ended up spraying the whole emblem and then buying a wood burning kit from Lowes and using a "hot knife" to trim the red area to remove the Plasti-Dip from it. Genius!! ?

 

BEFORE and AFTER and wood burning kit with hot knife tip.

post-163421-0-15857000-1489974913_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-40958200-1489974921_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-15857000-1489974913_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-40958200-1489974921_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-15857000-1489974913_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-40958200-1489974921_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-15857000-1489974913_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-40958200-1489974921_thumb.jpg

Edited by AllTerrainX
  • Like 5
Posted (edited)

Finally finished the back "GMC" and all the "All Terrain" emblems. Love how they turned out. Next is taking off the front grill and spray the other "GMC" emblem and the front grill.

post-163421-0-49086300-1490273712_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-49086300-1490273712_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-49086300-1490273712_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-49086300-1490273712_thumb.jpg

Edited by AllTerrainX
  • Like 6
Posted

looks bad ass guys!... .. but i like my chrome! lol..

  • Like 1
Posted

Finally got one "All Terrain" emblem to come out good with the Plasti-Dip. So I ended up spraying the whole emblem and then buying a wood burning kit from Lowes and using a "hot knife" to trim the red area to remove the Plasti-Dip from it. Genius!!

 

BEFORE and AFTER and wood burning kit with hot knife tip.

Center out great. I tried to do the same but had issues. But didn't think of using a wood burning kit to do that. Great idea!

 

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Onto the front grille. Pictures are my BEFORE and disassemble of the front "GMC" emblem and black chrome looking pieces to get Plasti-dipped.

 

post-163421-0-03780500-1490826109_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-58503300-1490826309_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-17755200-1490826317_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-03780500-1490826109_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-58503300-1490826309_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-17755200-1490826317_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-03780500-1490826109_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-58503300-1490826309_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-17755200-1490826317_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-03780500-1490826109_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-58503300-1490826309_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-17755200-1490826317_thumb.jpg

Edited by AllTerrainX
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

"GMC" emblem (chrome area) and bottom piece Plasti-dipped. Top piece is the stock black chrome color. Middle is in the process of getting sprayed. I think it looks good so far and adds durability to the pieces. Some of them had small nicks.

 

post-163421-0-06052400-1490827056_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-77736300-1490827062_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-06052400-1490827056_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-77736300-1490827062_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-06052400-1490827056_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-77736300-1490827062_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-06052400-1490827056_thumb.jpg

post-163421-0-77736300-1490827062_thumb.jpg

Edited by AllTerrainX
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...