Jump to content

Should I run 87 or 89 fuel in my 2017 Silverado 1500 5.3L?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Top Tier does not refer to octane rating. You can buy top tier 87, 89 and premium.

 

Correct, the comment on engine compression deals with the octane rating.

 

The link about top tier gas was a response for Sage55.

  • 4 months later...
Posted

If I’m not mistaken those gas tankers have sealed compartments, so the same truck may have 3 different kinds of fuels onboard.

 

What makes me wonder is if the driver ever put the wrong fuel in?

Posted

The main thing for fuel economy is to purchase non-ethanol fuel if you can find it. I run 91 octane non-ethanol, and my old '13 and my current '17 seem to like it.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Saw this thread and thought why not?  Tried 3 tanks of 91 octane in my 5.3L & gas mileage went down compared to the 87 I was running.  On 87 I was averaging about 17.5mpg in mixed driving, 60% city/40% hwy.  With the premium grade 91 octane, mileage went down to 15.7 on my last tank with the same basic mix of driving. 

 

I've now got mid-grade 89 octane in the tank.  Will run a couple tanks this way to see if there's any change.

Posted
14 hours ago, steve76t said:

Saw this thread and thought why not?  Tried 3 tanks of 91 octane in my 5.3L & gas mileage went down compared to the 87 I was running.  On 87 I was averaging about 17.5mpg in mixed driving, 60% city/40% hwy.  With the premium grade 91 octane, mileage went down to 15.7 on my last tank with the same basic mix of driving. 

 

I've now got mid-grade 89 octane in the tank.  Will run a couple tanks this way to see if there's any change.

I was running 89 all the time until I realized that I wasn't getting Top Tier. I've been going to Costco lately and they don't have 89, just 87 and 92 so now I'm on my 2nd tank of 92. I used to feel surging (like when accelerating on an on ramp) with 87 and 89 but don't feel it at all with 92. I'm sure that the ECM is pulling timing when that happens so I'll probably stay with 92.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,203 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...