Jump to content

Level/rear block Question


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone new member here. I have a 14 GMC Sierra Slt z71 4x4. I just ordered a 2 level from RC and Im trying to decide what rear block size to get. I want to keep the rake in my truck. Im thinking 3 blocks. I had them on my 12 Silverado but I can seem to find anyone who did this on a newer body style. Does anyone have any pictures of a 2 level with 3 rear blocks or 2 level with 2 blocks? Thanks in advance!

Posted

Try searching, tons of people have both of those setups. Check out the level thread that is stickied in the modifications sections, you will find a bunch of pics of people who did that.

 

Tyler

  • 2 months later...
Posted

1.85" Bilstein lift in the front and 3" blocks ( removed factory blocks) in the rear. Tires measure 33.1" tall. 9dc878c7e30a0ef8258f7559c07e90a9.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

Posted
1.85" Bilstein lift in the front and 3" blocks ( removed factory blocks) in the rear. Tires measure 33.1" tall. 9dc878c7e30a0ef8258f7559c07e90a9.jpg
 
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 
 
 
 
Didn't realize when I loaded this pic I had around 1000 pounds of shingles in the back lol.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted

2" front with a 3" rear block will sit pretty much with factory rake. If you like the nose down look, then thats the way to go. I have a 2" front level that I just put on my 17 Silverado, and it has .5" of rake, so I think I'm gonna get a 2" block, which only lifts the rear 3/4". My last truck had 2.75" fron and 3" rear blocks which sat awesome but the CV angles were crap, and it killed the ball joints. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, rastasquid said:

2" front with a 3" rear block will sit pretty much with factory rake. If you like the nose down look, then thats the way to go. I have a 2" front level that I just put on my 17 Silverado, and it has .5" of rake, so I think I'm gonna get a 2" block, which only lifts the rear 3/4". My last truck had 2.75" fron and 3" rear blocks which sat awesome but the CV angles were crap, and it killed the ball joints. 

I’ve heard so many people claim this on here, but have never seen or heard of that happening to anyone. I’ve had 5 different 1/2 tons with the 2.5/3 setup and drive on my ranch at home and down oilfield lease roads daily and have never had any issue. 

Posted

My last truck was a 2010 Sierra 1500, which I was running a 2" RC level with Bilstein 5100's set at .75". 3" rear blocks.  I put about 30k miles on no problem, then in the next 10k miles I had an inner axle seal go, both CV boots had tears from the angle they were at. When i traded the truck in both upper control arms needed to be replaced. I daily drove it with occasional trips to a hunting lease and occasional light towing. Maybe that extra .25" makes a difference? Not tryin to argue just sharing my experience. That said.... my 17 will probably end up with the same setup as my last truck because I'm an idiot.

Posted
1 hour ago, rastasquid said:

My last truck was a 2010 Sierra 1500, which I was running a 2" RC level with Bilstein 5100's set at .75". 3" rear blocks.  I put about 30k miles on no problem, then in the next 10k miles I had an inner axle seal go, both CV boots had tears from the angle they were at. When i traded the truck in both upper control arms needed to be replaced. I daily drove it with occasional trips to a hunting lease and occasional light towing. Maybe that extra .25" makes a difference? Not tryin to argue just sharing my experience. That said.... my 17 will probably end up with the same setup as my last truck because I'm an idiot.

That’s wild. I’ve just never experienced any issues myself and have never heard of any until joining this group. Best of luck

Posted
3 hours ago, rastasquid said:

Well if you’ve never experienced something but a bunch of other people have, it must be fake news.

I was just curious as I stated before. Have a good one up there

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,220 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The oil filter has NOTHING To do with oil leak. GM sources parts from 1,000's of vendors and as with anything mass produced, flaws are unavoidable.    Putting a larger oil filter will do nothing but satisfy emotions. The OEM filter is designed for the engine and perfectly capable of handling the demands on the engine. Oversize oil filter could result in reduced flow and overall lower oil pressure.
    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...