Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Jstnelson said:

I’ve thought about trying some temporary hack like that. I’m curious if there is anything inside the pipe as well though. If there is some kind of obstruction within the piping, I’d just get the pipes replaced. But if it’s just hollow pipes with mesh cutouts, I’ll seal them up. 

I'm no engineer but to me just having the open mesh would allow the exhaust pulse to change with the sound waves traveling through the pipe since it is open to the side making it quieter out the back of the pipe. 

 

I'm sure in time someone will remove and cut open to see inside. Then we will know.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Black02Silverado said:

I'm no engineer but to me just having the open mesh would allow the exhaust pulse to change with the sound waves traveling through the pipe since it is open to the side making it quieter out the back of the pipe. 

 

I'm sure in time someone will remove and cut open to see inside. Then we will know.

I agree that’s probably the case. If I do find out there’s something cased within the piping, I’ll report back. 

Posted (edited)

Just for your information:

it’s an empty pipe, which has holes to break the pipe resonances (standing acoustic waves within the pipe). The patches are for reducing the generation of further noise sources along the tail pipe. This design replaces a resonator.

 

The best way to test is covering the patches as mentioned (clamps, pieces of metal), no need to remove or cut. The result can be a booming noise at the pipe resonance frequencies. It might rather be noticed in the car than outside.

 

If you replace the muffler, you have to pay attention about the positioning of the patches. The position is related to the tailpipe’s total length, which is calculated from within the muffler (after the last perforation field) related to the standing acoustic waves within the pipe. Positions therefore are 50% and as far as I remember 75% plus one in between of the total tailpipe length (including the section inside the muffler).

 

 

Edited by Edward Nygma
  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Edward Nygma said:

Just for your information:

it’s an empty pipe, which has holes to break the pipe resonances (standing acoustic waves within the pipe). The patches are for reducing the generation of further noise sources along the tail pipe. This design replaces a resonator.

 

The best way to test is covering the patches as mentioned (clamps, pieces of metal), no need to remove or cut. The result can be a booming noise at the pipe resonance frequencies. It might rather be noticed in the car than outside.

 

If you replace the muffler, you have to pay attention about the positioning of the patches. The position is related to the tailpipe’s total length, which is calculated from within the muffler (after the last perforation field) related to the standing acoustic waves within the pipe. Positions therefore are 50% and as far as I remember 75% plus one in between of the total tailpipe length (including the section inside the muffler).

 

 

Haha, I just found that video and came back here to post it.

 

I’m going to order some exhaust sleeve clamps from Amazon. I figure I can clamp them all closed and test it out. If there’s unwanted changes I can remove some or all of them. I’ll report back. 

 

The clamps are $10 a piece so I can’t decide if I want to order 2 and make sure it works well or order all 6 lol

Posted
1 hour ago, Jstnelson said:

Haha, I just found that video and came back here to post it.

 

I’m going to order some exhaust sleeve clamps from Amazon. I figure I can clamp them all closed and test it out. If there’s unwanted changes I can remove some or all of them. I’ll report back. 

 

The clamps are $10 a piece so I can’t decide if I want to order 2 and make sure it works well or order all 6 lol

$60 to see if it makes a difference?  I think I would do the aluminum can and hose clamp thing first. :)

Posted
4 minutes ago, Black02Silverado said:

$60 to see if it makes a difference?  I think I would do the aluminum can and hose clamp thing first. :)

Well, If the $60 clamps work, they’re my permanent solution and a simple install; rather than buying hose clamps and cutting up cans just to test it lol. 

 

I ordered 6 of them from Amazon. So I’ll let everyone know how it goes. 

Posted (edited)
Quote

I’m going to order some exhaust sleeve clamps from Amazon. I figure I can clamp them all closed and test it out. If there’s unwanted changes I can remove some or all of them. I’ll report back. 

I'd be interested in the Outcome... :)
It could make a difference which holes you cover (or don't cover). Do the flute :D

Edited by Edward Nygma
Wrong quote
Posted
54 minutes ago, Edward Nygma said:

I'd be interested in the Outcome... :)
It could make a difference which holes you cover (or don't cover). Do the flute :D

Yea, my thoughts exactly. I’m going to cover them all then, if there’s unwanted drone, I’ll take 2 off and experiment covering 4 in different locations. 

 

I received the clamps yesterday and they sent me the wrong size (2.25” instead of 2.75”) so I’m expecting them Tuesday now :(

Posted

So today I performed a purely scientific experiment in a scientifically sound environment (my front yard) using nothing but industrial strength Duct Tape, from Harbor Freight no less....  Haha!  The duct tape fits over the mesh perfectly so why not?  I covered all 4 of my mesh holes...did I just type that?

 

Anyway,  the results were very surprising!  I mentioned in another thread that my Magnaflow muffler was actually quieter at idle than stock and the exhaust could really only be heard during fairly heavy acceleration.    Duct Tape fixed everything just like always.  Definitely crisper at idle with the deep tone back and I can hear the exhaust all the time now- not much louder, but it's definitely there now.  I haven't driven more than a few blocks so not sure about the highway noise- it'll probably burn the tape off before I can get to the highway anyway, lol.

 

Curious if this makes a big difference to the stock exhaust as well.  I'll be covering these up with something (ahem) better I think.  Go Science.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Limelight said:

So today I performed a purely scientific experiment in a scientifically sound environment (my front yard) using nothing but industrial strength Duct Tape, from Harbor Freight no less....  Haha!  The duct tape fits over the mesh perfectly so why not?  I covered all 4 of my mesh holes...did I just type that?

 

Anyway,  the results were very surprising!  I mentioned in another thread that my Magnaflow muffler was actually quieter at idle than stock and the exhaust could really only be heard during fairly heavy acceleration.    Duct Tape fixed everything just like always.  Definitely crisper at idle with the deep tone back and I can hear the exhaust all the time now- not much louder, but it's definitely there now.  I haven't driven more than a few blocks so not sure about the highway noise- it'll probably burn the tape off before I can get to the highway anyway, lol.

 

Curious if this makes a big difference to the stock exhaust as well.  I'll be covering these up with something (ahem) better I think.  Go Science.

 

 

Haha, nice. I contemplated doing something similar first. My clamps were delayed and arrive tomorrow but i’ll be putting them on ASAP. 

Posted
10 hours ago, Jstnelson said:

Haha, nice. I contemplated doing something similar first. My clamps were delayed and arrive tomorrow but i’ll be putting them on ASAP. 

Drove it to work this morning and it is definitely a big difference.  And the tape is still there, ha!

Posted (edited)
On 4/10/2019 at 8:24 AM, Limelight said:

Drove it to work this morning and it is definitely a big difference.  And the tape is still there, ha!

I installed my sleeve clamps last night and drove it to work this morning. It’s definitely a little louder. I can hear a little tone at idle from inside the truck now. It used to be almost silent at warm idle. I like it. Took it from about a 4 to a 5 on the loud scale. And still absolutely no cabin drone. 

 

2.75” clamps are too big for stock exhaust though. I’m going to get some exhaust patch tape and place that over the mesh and tighten the clamps back over that to get a tight fit. 

Edited by Jstnelson
  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/11/2019 at 8:43 AM, Jstnelson said:

I installed my sleeve clamps last night and drove it to work this morning. It’s definitely a little louder. I can hear a little tone at idle from inside the truck now. It used to be almost silent at warm idle. I like it. Took it from about a 4 to a 5 on the loud scale. And still absolutely no cabin drone. 

 

2.75” clamps are too big for stock exhaust though. I’m going to get some exhaust patch tape and place that over the mesh and tighten the clamps back over that to get a tight fit. 

Just an update after driving a few hundred miles; clamping the resonance free pipe is a definite sound improvement. I highly recommend a Flowmaster super 40 and clamped mesh inserts. It gives a great tone outside the truck and, while driving, you can clearly hear a good V8 exhaust tone with no drone at all and still pretty silent on the highway. There are a couple speeds that you can steadily hear an exhaust tone while cruising but it never drones/resonates within the cab. 

 

Revving the truck with stock exhaust sounded like a vacuum cleaner. 

 

Revving with Flowmaster Super 40 and stock axle-back had a good tone but sounded like someone was holding a pillow over the tips. You could convince me it was a stock exhaust if I didn’t hear a cold start. 

 

Revving with Flowmaster Super 40 with closed off mesh resonators sounds loud and mean. Definitely sounds aftermarket. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hi friends - first time poster. I have a 2015 sierra Denali with 150k miles, I’m the second owner and she’s given me 75k of great service. I run a pulse AFM disable device. Starting Thursday when I exited the freeway after a short local ride it started idling rough, with an obvious misfire shake and was down on low end power.  I got it home and hooked it up to my scannner and found no codes but in live data a pretty bad misfire on cylinder 5. I replaced the coil, plug and wire with all new OE replacements (Delphi gn10165 coil, acdelco wire and 41-168 plug). It’s still behaving the same way after firing the parts cannon at it.   I know cyl 5 is a non AFM cylinder so I am not thinking this is AFM related but I’m kinda at a loss. injector? Bent pushrod? It’s running too well over 1k rpm to suggest those IMO. Has anyone chase this issue before and what was it? Any suggestions? 
    • 2017 Silverado L83 5.3l 6speed transmission Hello, not a new member but havent posted in a while and my old signup info isnt working so had to create a new account. anyways, I have an issue with my truck and hope someone can spread some light on whats happening: -when it goes to 4cyl mode it makes a clunk sound (but not when coasting or going downhill) -when in 4 cyl mode and under load it makes a load pulsating sound (not a tick). -goes away completely when in M5 gear or when plugging in an AFM delete. Im guessing it is one of 2 things but im not convinced of either to be honest. 1. lifter stuck in v8 mode 2. torque converter shudder realistically it doesn't seem like the TC as there is no physical vibration , and it never happens in v8 mode. but maybe? and wouldnt a lifter make a sound whether with load or not? any ideas let me know please. thank you!  
    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...