Jump to content

Complex Tire question


Timmayy!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So i recently purchased a 2018 SLT 4x4 crew Z71 with the 275/55/r20 tires. I know i want to upgrade from the SRA's but I'm stuck in the never ending loop of which tire and size to buy. One thing i cant seem to figure out is does a 275/60/20 fit with out a level? I question this because i saw another poster mention that the stamped UCA on the newer sierras wont fit 275/60/20 with a level... So that's got me confused.

 

Also say that 275/60/20 can fit without a level with no rubbing I'm torn between load ranges. I know i don't want load range E at all, too stiff and don't have anything that would tow near max capacity but i do tow flatboats and center consoles at least once a month. I do a lot of highway driving and MPG and ride quality is important to me. Off-roading is minimal and the main reason for the tire change would be the avoidance of getting stuck in barely muddy grass as well as the upgrade in looks.

 

To me the Falken wildpeak at3w in either size range would fit the bill perfectly, however... I noticed the 275/60/20 is a standard load (4ply) with a load index of 114 or 115. The 275/55/20 is an XL (6ply) load index of 117. The XL (6 ply) seems like it would be the perfect rated tire for me but I'm not sure i would like the llok of the tire on the truck as i haven't seen any trucks with the stock tire size but upgraded ATs.

 

So if i chose the 275/60/20 (assuming it would fit with no level) would i be disappointed in the 4 ply and its towing capability. Me leans to know since that is what the SRAs are but what say you.

 

Sorry for the inevitable thread that has probably been beaten to death.

Posted

The Continental Terrain Contact A/T in 275/60-20 would be another good option.

Posted

On my 2014 275/60/20 fit with minimal rubbing of the inner fender liner. Now sure on the 2018 model.

Why not just get a 2" level? Cheap parts and easy to install and you still retain a slight rake.

Posted

Somewhat fuel economy, somewhat don't want the extra strain on the front suspension, and somewhat because i thought i saw somewhere that with the new stamped UCA a level didn't stop you from rubbing.

Posted

i'm picking up new shoes the day after thanksgiving...and i'm kinda in the same boat... almost got 47k on the SRAs.. which surprised me.. but they are worn thin.... i think i'm going to go up one size from the 275/55/20 i have on there now.. i believe they are 31's... i wouldn't mind a 33... . i do have a level.. . hhmm so many decisions.. but sticking with the TKO2's either way/size.. always had bfg's and they have always treated me well.

Posted

.. as far as the 55 vs 60 fitting you are only changing diameter not cross section so all things being equal, if the 55 width fits then the 60 will also. The 60 will get you a 33” tire vs 31.9

Have a look at this link to calculate and compare tire sizes.

 

http://tiresize.com/calculator/

 

Posted

Hello

I purchased a GMC Elevation Edition in July. I just upgraded to the Falken Wildpeak at3w. We also just had our 1st real snow yesterday. I went with the stock size 275/55/20. 

So far I find them quiet and they handled really great in the snow. Like you I was researching trying to go a size bigger, but couldn't get a definitive answer so I stuck with stock size. To me, they look much better on the truck, they fill out the wheel wells a bit more, but if you are looking for a truly aggressive off road look to your tire they might not fit the bill. To my eye that has a lot to do with the wheel size. I think 17-inch wheels would look better with the tires.

I am going to ride these tires out then when I am due for new ones I am looking to lift the truck and will explore bigger tires.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, STRMTRPR said:

.. as far as the 55 vs 60 fitting you are only changing diameter not cross section so all things being equal, if the 55 width fits then the 60 will also. The 60 will get you a 33” tire vs 31.9

Have a look at this link to calculate and compare tire sizes.

 

http://tiresize.com/calculator/

 

Diameter is not the only thing that would cause rubbing. It’s a combination of offset width and total diameter. The extra height of the 275/60/20 might make the tire reach out too far while turning and rub. 

 

But i cannot seem to get a definitive answer on the 275/60/20 with the wildpeaks and a 2018 whether not not they fit. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My brother has an Escalade. The warranty has expired so he told his wife to go to the Valvoline quick lube he uses some times. They told her if her car was a 2020 and newer 6.2 engine they wouldn’t touch it. Hers is a 2019, so they did the oil change.
    • The oil filter has NOTHING To do with oil leak. GM sources parts from 1,000's of vendors and as with anything mass produced, flaws are unavoidable.    Putting a larger oil filter will do nothing but satisfy emotions. The OEM filter is designed for the engine and perfectly capable of handling the demands on the engine. Oversize oil filter could result in reduced flow and overall lower oil pressure.
    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...