Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

People  !!! Front gear ratio change is not available for 2021 Silverado 1500 4X4.  So do not change rear ratio because you cannot change the front !!!. I learned the hard way after having my rear end done to 4:56 . We have contacted many axle rear end shops and they say " NOT AVAILABLE"  NOBODY KNOWS WHEN GEAR SET WILL BE AVAILABLE.. . My rear end is already geared to 4:56 so I am stuck driving truck with out front drive line while waiting for someone to manufacture front 4:56 gear ratio... My tires are 36"

Posted
Just now, Alfred Padula said:

People  !!! Front gear ratio change is not available for 2021 Silverado 1500 4X4.  So do not change rear ratio because you cannot change the front !!!. I learned the hard way after having my rear end done to 4:56 . We have contacted many axle rear end shops and they say " NOT AVAILABLE"  NOBODY KNOWS WHEN GEAR SET WILL BE AVAILABLE.. . My rear end is already geared to 4:56 so I am stuck driving truck with out front drive line while waiting for someone to manufacture front 4:56 gear ratio... My tires are 36"

Any help would be greatly appreciated !!!

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I'm on the same boat, I've been looking at re-gearing since I'm running 37", no luck finding front gears or lockers, any one has any solutions for this new stile Silverado, I have a trail boss edition

Posted

Rayo, there is no front gearing available as of yet. Rear gears are available but when my 4x4 shop  installed them and a Hypertech  speedo calibrator for the 4:56 rear gears my truck computer would not accept this change. there is no fix as of yet....I drive my truck in Tow/Haul mode all the time which really helps out but this is not a permanent fix.

Posted (edited)

I believe with the front its not a simple ring/pinion swap you have to replace the whole diff. I don't know if the front diff is different on T1's or not, but with the k2's you can go up to 3.73.

 

For some reason I'm thinking the 3.0 diesel has 3.73s, so you should be able to. 

Edited by M1ck3y
Posted
1 hour ago, M1ck3y said:

I believe with the front its not a simple ring/pinion swap you have to replace the whole diff. I don't know if the front diff is different on T1's or not, but with the k2's you can go up to 3.73.

 

For some reason I'm thinking the 3.0 diesel has 3.73s, so you should be able to. 

Take a look at your front diff.  About ten years ago GM went from the split diff style front IFS diffs they had been using to a more conventional (looks like a rear diff with a removable cover) diff.  I believe the ring gear changed then as well.

 

Starting in 2019, after the AAM Co rear axle vibration issue the 14-18 trucks suffered from, GM has started making their own axles again as well as using some AAM Co axles.  That's where the change is.

 

These axles can be regeared just like any other axle.  The aftermarket just hasn't started making gears for the front yet.  The rear axles are pretty much the same internally since 2014.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, AJMBLAZER said:

Take a look at your front diff.  About ten years ago GM went from the split diff style front IFS diffs they had been using to a more conventional (looks like a rear diff with a removable cover) diff.  I believe the ring gear changed then as well.

 

Starting in 2019, after the AAM Co rear axle vibration issue the 14-18 trucks suffered from, GM has started making their own axles again as well as using some AAM Co axles.  That's where the change is.

 

These axles can be regeared just like any other axle.  The aftermarket just hasn't started making gears for the front yet.  The rear axles are pretty much the same internally since 2014.

 

Good info, thanks. So your saying the T1's use the same front diff as the k2's?

Posted

I can't confirm that.  I do think that they must have changed something internally on the AAM Co made front axles since it seems like the ring and pinion from the 14-18 trucks won't work.

 

The new GM front axles are not supported by the aftermarket yet.

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted

I know this is an old post but since GM offers the 3.0 Duramax with 3.73's and someone like me who has a 6.2 with 3.42's and has gone up to 35's, going to 3.73's would make up for the tire size difference. (weight and wind resistance is a different story) but at least when towing my 10,000lb toy hauler I'd be slightly better off than where I am today. I'd rather go all the way to a 4.10 but with 3.73's my speedo would be extremely close and I could ditch the Hypertech inline corrector. Thoughts?

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, jpfanner said:

I know this is an old post but since GM offers the 3.0 Duramax with 3.73's and someone like me who has a 6.2 with 3.42's and has gone up to 35's, going to 3.73's would make up for the tire size difference. (weight and wind resistance is a different story) but at least when towing my 10,000lb toy hauler I'd be slightly better off than where I am today. I'd rather go all the way to a 4.10 but with 3.73's my speedo would be extremely close and I could ditch the Hypertech inline corrector. Thoughts?

 

I'm in basically the same boat.  See this post in a different thread: 

 I'm actually in slightly worse shape, since my AT4 has factory 3.23 gearing.  I'm at (effectively) a 3.08 gear right now with 35" tires and the stock 3.23's.  The 6.2L and 10-speed trans DO make up for a lot, but 3.73's would get me pretty close to (effectively) stock 3.42 gearing, which is the same thing you're after (and should be perfect for my needs).

While I'm pretty sure rear axle ring/pinion sets are available aftermarket (my rear axle is an SU7; an AAM axle.  SU8 is the GM rear axle)... the big questions revolve around the front axle.  

Rumor has it that GM may be welding (or otherwise permanently attaching) the ring gear to the carrier in the front axles on these trucks.  If that's true (and I've heard it from more than one source) then that may be part of the reason the aftermarket doesn't seem to have any ring/pinion sets available (yet, anyway).

Now I'm not opposed to purchasing a whole front carrier (w/ring) and pinion directly from GM in 3.73 if that's the only way to do it right now, but that brings additional questions into play.  GM is using two different front axles on these trucks.  The SU5 (what I have) is a GM front axle.   And there's also an SU4, an AAM front axle.

 

So, if the 3.73 front ratio is only available with the 3.0L Duramax diesel, which front axle are they putting in those trucks?... and/or... are the internals (ring/pinion/carrier) interchangeable between the AAM and GM axle?  Because if ALL of the Duramax diesel 3.73 geared 4x4 trucks have AAM axles... and the internals are not interchangeable... then even trying to buy 3.73 front gearing direct from GM won't work for me (and my GM front axle).       

 

Just food for thought.  If you come up with a workable solution, please do come back and post it here (I'll do the same).

Edited by barr8888
Posted

The front gears are not “welded to” the front carrier. That’s been disproven many times. There’s pictures around here to prove it. 

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, AJMBLAZER said:

The front gears are not “welded to” the front carrier. That’s been disproven many times. There’s pictures around here to prove it. 

 

It's not my intent to spread misinformation... I'm only citing what I've personally been told by a GM dealership parts person... and have also read elsewhere. 

I acknowledge that it doesn't sound like something that makes any sense to me.  I don't see how the hardness of the ring gear itself could be maintained if any attempt was made to weld it, for one.

 I haven't taken the cover off my front axle to verify anything personally yet.  But finding reliable information and/or parts to change the front axle ratio has been much more of a challenge than I was expecting, so far.

Edited by barr8888
Posted

What happens if you re-gear the rear but not the front?

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Byrds8 said:

What happens if you re-gear the rear but not the front?

You can’t use 4x4. The tires would be turning at different speeds front and back and as soon as they grabbed traction something would break. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,582 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...