Jump to content

2003 to 2007 classic RCSB


Recommended Posts

Posted

I am seriously think of buying a RCSB 2006 Silverado z71 that is local and that I found when I came home. I was in Arizona for 4 months looking on web and all over the USA, then I come home and find one right here in Alberta less than 50 miles from where I live.

But I am having a hard time trying to decide. It does have a bit of work that would need to be done to it to bring it up to my standard but is that not what we do?

Any of your thoughts on spending a sizable chunk of change on a older Chevy. Would like to know what others have done.

 

Thanks! 

2006 s.jpg

Posted

Didn't I say that a couple months back lol.  I wanted a 2010 to 2013 6.2 powered extended cab with cloth interior and low miles... guys told me I would never find one.  Weird... bought a 2013 with 75000 kms on it a week and half ago that's a LT Chevy with the NHT package including good old 3.73 gears lol.  I find zero reason to look in the US for anything like I said before. 

Posted

Any rust? Looks good from the picture. That's the main reason I traded my 2003 in for a 2017 was the rust that expanded very quickly on the rockers and when I look around most all trucks from that era seem to have the same thing.  That's a nice looking truck, curious how many miles and what price is it listed for?

Posted

I am still in debating mode on it. He is asking $13,500.00 can

It has 172000km/107000miles.

 

The rockers are not to bad and have mostly gravel rash. So far my assessment would be on the body a 7 out of 10, and on the interior a 8 out of 10. I t has some small parking lot dings but I think they can be taken out with paintless repair. Back to the rockers and cab corners, the rockers have some gravel rash but I think I could clean them up and repaint at this point, cab corners look ok.

 

This truck was not babied for sure. But I think it is at the point where it can be saved with a few new oem parts.

 

Now the good part! When the original owner sold to the current owner the 5.3 had some issues, to make along story short the engine was pooched. So the current owner thought that he would put a GM crate motor in it. For a few hundred more over the price of a new 5.3 he put in a LQ9 6liter. Install was done at a GM dealer and then was taken to a performance shop in Lethbridge to get a bit more out of it with out going crazy. So it is not cranked way up but at the lets have some fun point. He wanted it to be useable with out being crazy. When the install was done he also removed all the resonators and catalytic converter. Still only a single pipe system but the exhaust note sounds very good.

 

That said, a 6liter would not have been my choice but I was not paying the tab. The swap was done when the truck had 135000km on it so the engine currently has about 37000km on it. It shifts firm and strong and the brakes were done last summer. Steering it firm as well.  

 

At this point I am not sure what I should or will do. Decision making is tough when you get old! hahaha

 

Any opinions are appreciated! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

Low mile LQ9 is alright.  Depends on your goals I guess.  My 04 I went overboard with but i always do.  I started with a light duty 3/4 ton because then it just has the 4L80e, 9.25" front diff and 9.5" rear the half ton owners want when the 10 bolt explodes as does the 4L60e.  Engine is a forged 370 i built with cnc ported heads and a TVS 2300.  Nothing is out of the box.... 100 lb per hour injectors, dual 450 walbro pumps, 1/2" feed and 3/8" return, custom heat exchanger for the blower etc.  

 

The truck is a 145000 km original I basically made new again.. is what it is.  I have close to the sticker price of a new Denali 3/4 ton into it lol... don't care though.  This engine won't make enough power so a larger cube LSX based setup with a blower will come along in time... maybe I will blow this one up but I doubt it.  

 

Sky is the limit

Posted

I decided against this purchase. Way more work involved than I was prepared to take on. It would have been fun though. :sigh:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,889
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    smandy
    Newest Member
    smandy
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 509 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Sure, but they do have some affordable options like the Trax, Trailblazer, Envista, and Encore. Some of these have a cheaper base price than the Civic, though the fuel economy isn’t as high. The main problem is that people WANT the highest trim with all the goodies and finance for like 7 years. That’s how ppl “afford” the more expensive vehicles. 
    • Holy s**t - not much of a parts thrower you say? You BLASTED that thing with the parts cannon!  You'd have been probably $1,000 ahead if you had just brought it to a competent shop rather than shotgunning a bunch of parts it clearly didn't need.   Just FYI - oil additives are really, REALLY good at ONE thing ... and that's emptying your wallet. They're ALL useless gimmicks.   If that has the L94 or L99, then #7 is an AFM cylinder. I'd suspect a failed lifter in that case.   If you leaned on wiring, sensors, and/or connectors while changing the oil, you'll have to check all that to be sure pins didn't get pulled out, connectors broken, etc.. Old wire loom that was barely adequate when new is certainly brittle by year 19 - make sure wires aren't chaffed and shorting out somewhere where you might have leaned. or supported yourself on it.   If your a mechanic, why didn't you just find out what you were missing and troubleshoot from there??  TIMED spark, fuel PSI / injector pulse, air, compression.  Can't make ANY money going the parts cannon route.
    • LOL! Are you joking?? That wax SUCKS! 100% gimmick made to "look" good.    After just TWO winters I had severe surface rusting in patches over 90% of the frame. Only reason it looks great in the pics is because I SATURATED the frame every single fall with used motor oil for 14 of the 16 years I owned it. Otherwise it would've been sent to the crusher 8 years earlier with the speed it was rusting prior!    I sold that POS 3 years ago. Was a gigantic headache the second it rolled off the showroom floor. Brakes pulsated on the TEST DRIVE. Door trim fell off the 1st week! Interior squeaked and rattled, and the drivetrain clunked after 2k miles. 4x4 switch failed shortly after. Front end - ball joints, struts, hub bearings - all failed between 38k-50k. Engine started burning oil at 50k. Rear and and transmission failed before 100k. Nothing but problems, and frustration with the piss-poor engineering designed to make you give up. Well, it worked! Nothing on that truck was easy to remove ... except the wheels. They haven't figured out how to screw that up yet. Give 'em time ...   I won't make that mistake again. EVER.   Such fond memories ... https://postimg.cc/K1qf23tS  https://postimg.cc/gallery/X02z64J  https://postimg.cc/gallery/mHSRXZv  https://postimg.cc/gallery/D4mMRfL
    • Different monitors do their test only under conditions specific to that monitor.  you MIGHT find the drive cycle conditions for the monitor that isn't ready on this site: https://lemon-manuals.la/   If it's not there, then it should be on alldata.com for your truck, but it requires a paid subscription.   And you need to know which specific monitor isn't ready.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...