Jump to content

2015 Sierra 1500 Transmision Failure


Recommended Posts

Posted

On our way from Ohio to Hilton Head SC  the transmission stopped changing gears in my 2015 GMC Sierra (85,000 miles) while driving through the Appalachian Mountains at night. We were able to make it to a town with a GM dealer in SC before the truck stopped and would not engage into any gear. We checked into a Marriott Residence Inn, but by that time of night the rental car agency and GMC dealers were closed. The next day, Sunday, we contacted the only car rental opened that day (Enterprise) and rented the only pickup truck they had available, a Ford F 150. We needed a truck due to the amount of luggage and kayaks that we were carrying. We spent two nights in a hotel waiting for the GMC dealer to open on Monday  then had the GMC Sierra towed to the GMC serive center. There the repair was performed under warranty. We timed our return from Hilton Head to pick up the repaired truck on Friday . The truck required a new torque converter and transmission repairs due to metal fragments from a torque converter failure. We were informed by the Master tech at the GMC Service Center that the torque converter failure is a know issue in my model truck due to a defective product from the vendor and that the same vendor is still the only source for that torque converter meaning there is a likelihood for recurrence. At the beginning of April I contacted GM to request reimbursement for the $529.52 rental truck expense  and after review my request was denied because I “didn’t rent a GM product” . Note again that on a Sunday the only pickup truck available from Enterprise was a Ford F 150.  I have now turned this over to the Ohio Attorney General. Additionally, I have recieved notice from a law firm that are collecting the information from affected 2015-2019 Sierra/Silverado owners to file a private (not class action) suit.

GM has issued a recommendation to increase the frequency of transmission fluid flushes to remove metal fragments that are accumlating from the deterioration of the torque converter . This is GM's solution to extend the life of the transmisions. Obviously if the life of the transmissions can be extended to over 100,000 miles they will be out of warranty before failure.

 

Posted

I have been saying this in many posts on this and other sites. Most if not all don't listen or know a person with more mileage that is fine so that means they all are good. I have seen this on trucks with 40k miles. Gm is flushing them all in Hope to get it to live past the 100k mark. Also there ate issues with the temp these run at. Some but not all are running well hot 200or 210 as the normal temp and jumps from there at times. Again there are people arguing it is fine to 270 and that d6 is good to 240. But the pros and looks like even gm is working on a change with that as well.
In my professional opinion every 25k get a drop or a flush. I know it is a little pricey. But to that I say wait till you buy a new trans, converter,fluid, and labor $5,000-6000. Easy.

I love GM but I agree with you. Gm failed and left you to get around. Ok only option is Ford. Not on you and doesn't change the facts of the incident or that you are zero at fault. They should pay.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

Thanks for all that pertinent information. Every 25k drop or flush.



Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Posted

I was in for an oil change at 43k, and was told that a Trans Service is due at 50k, guess I better get-r-done.

Posted

I've been all over my trans maintenance for reasons as this right here.  I did a pan drop at 42k and then at 96k.  I am also running an external spin-on filter to help clean the fluid.  1slow1500 was also on my thread about deleting the 194*F trans Tstat.  Even more reason now after reading this.  Hate to hear it happened on vacation. 

Posted
On 16/06/2019 at 3:33 PM, 1SLOW1500 said:

I have been saying this in many posts on this and other sites. Most if not all don't listen or know a person with more mileage that is fine so that means they all are good. I have seen this on trucks with 40k miles. Gm is flushing them all in Hope to get it to live past the 100k mark. Also there ate issues with the temp these run at. Some but not all are running well hot 200or 210 as the normal temp and jumps from there at times. Again there are people arguing it is fine to 270 and that d6 is good to 240. But the pros and looks like even gm is working on a change with that as well.
In my professional opinion every 25k get a drop or a flush. I know it is a little pricey. But to that I say wait till you buy a new trans, converter,fluid, and labor $5,000-6000. Easy.

I love GM but I agree with you. Gm failed and left you to get around. Ok only option is Ford. Not on you and doesn't change the facts of the incident or that you are zero at fault. They should pay.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

Sorry, just to clarify/ confirm: that's every 25k miles, right? 

Posted
Sorry, just to clarify/ confirm: that's every 25k miles, right? 
Base it on trans temp but at stock 200-210* yes again sounds silly to many but what is a few hundred compared to being stuck on side of road and a $6000+ repair bill.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
8 hours ago, 1SLOW1500 said:

Base it on trans temp but at stock 200-210* yes again sounds silly to many but what is a few hundred compared to being stuck on side of road and a $6000+ repair bill.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

Why i buy the kinda vehicles you can also rent for a little swaparooo if need be.

 

Uhaul. The other warranty.

 

This post is for amusement puposes only..and I just read the Guidelines an she looks A-OK.  ....laughter starts here

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 5,710 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...