Jump to content

Quick air dam question

bentarm13

By bentarm13
in Modifications & Accessories

Recommended Posts

1SLOW1500 Senior Enthusiast

1SLOW1500

Posted
Posted

People that remove it want a offroad and lifted look also saves it if you really off road it. But it was added for a reason and even us lowered guys benefit maybe more so. With aerodynamics. I also believe it keeps a little more debris out of the engine bay.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

JimCost2014 Senior Enthusiast

JimCost2014

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, bentarm13 said:

Is there a reason people remove the front air dam? Does it help in any way or is purely cosmetic?

It is actually two pieces, upper and the lower portion.

 

Both are there for aerodynamics, plenty of threads on here about removing either one, or both.

gastonhector Enthusiast

gastonhector

Posted
Posted
Is there a reason people remove the front air dam? Does it help in any way or is purely cosmetic?

I remove this because I win more heigh and I install a skid plate SDHQ I love this look and I considered is the difference os MPG is minimal


Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk
Sean006 Enthusiast

Sean006

Posted
Posted

I removed mine for about a month 

yeah it gave me that higher appearance but it also looked “unfinished” without it 

 

so I cut it in half with a dremel - and bolted back on

 

much better imo 

gcm0001 New Member

gcm0001

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, bentarm13 said:

Is there a reason people remove the front air dam? Does it help in any way or is purely cosmetic?

I removed mine for cosmetic reasons and also because we own property with some steep terraces that are know to knock air dams off or break them.

 

I have a 15 Silverado with a 2" level and a Ranch Hand brush guard on it, I have not seen any difference in my mileage since I took it off several months ago. This photo is before I put my Ridge Grapplers on but it the best pic I have of the front.

 

 

Truck.thumb.jpg.7f8723e94ade40308136775a90a1d20f.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,980
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Fishboat
    Newest Member
    Fishboat
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 481 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • diyer2
      AFM Experience

      By diyer2 · Posted

      Hey guys, sorry for the confusison about this. This wasn't my experainnce, it was copied and pasted fom the net. 
    • KARNUT
      AFM Experience

      By KARNUT · Posted

      The problem with failure rates or increase failures are there’s people who don’t have a problem. What are you doing wrong they say. We had 4 5.7 GM diesel’s in the family when they came out. One was flawless. My uncle who happened to be the most abusive. Early rotary engines were known to use oil. I abused my first car so bad in six months I replaced the clutch, transmission and rear end. It didn’t use oil. My brother in law has a 2013 Tahoe and an older Yukon. The Yukon has 280K miles. The Tahoe around 175K. He runs them to about 300K. If his lifters fail before that time he would consider it a failure. My Hondas, I know people hate it when I mention them. Identical engines. One with cylinder deactivation one doesn’t have it. One shudders when the eco light goes on or off. Cylinder deactivation. But wait! According to the web. It can happen with lock up too. So now people in the know are changing the oil and transmission fluid more often. Then you read it could be a programing issue. So what do you do? There’s lots of money involved. I see three ways to deal with it. One only works if you don’t drive lots of miles. Lease, never get out of warranty. Or only buy older vehicles with a good track record. They all have bad runs. Usually when there’s a change. Even Toyota and Honda. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      AFM Experience

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • SwitchBladeSierra
      14-18 Sierra 1500 Heated Steering Wheel Help

      By SwitchBladeSierra · Posted

      UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • newdude
      Seems to be Missing a lot of Updates

      By newdude · Posted

      GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...