Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Will 285/55/22 Nitto TGs fit on a stock Denali with out rubbing or trimming? I read through all the threads and not sure if the people running these all did a level or not. I want to keep as is for now except to replace the horrible stock tires.

Thanks.

Posted

Not sure if the 55 will be too tall or not. That's just under 34.5 inches which might be too tall without at least a level.

I'm also upgrading mine to a 305/45/22 and will fit no problem on stock offset wheels.



Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

Posted

Thanks eppieguy.

I don't really want to go that much wider, just want a little more sidewall in a good all terrain tire. Will have to keep looking.

Posted
On 11/14/2019 at 9:11 PM, wurgs said:

Will 285/55/22 Nitto TGs fit on a stock Denali with out rubbing or trimming? I read through all the threads and not sure if the people running these all did a level or not. I want to keep as is for now except to replace the horrible stock tires.

Thanks.

I'm not sure but 285/50/22 fit perfect without level.

IMG_20191107_122315.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted
I'm not sure but 285/50/22 fit perfect without level.
IMG_20191107_122315.thumb.jpg.c207d6c48173b4b18e4291a6759f9a64.jpg
Like the look! How close are you to rubbing? I'm ordering 305 45 22. Same size as stock but wider

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

Posted
3 hours ago, Ianwelch001 said:

Like the look! How close are you to rubbing? I'm ordering 305 45 22. Same size as stock but wider

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
 

There's probably an inch or so from rubbing fronts (didn't measure) but the running boards in the 3rd position just touch the side lugs in the rear so you might have an issue there.

Posted
There's probably an inch or so from rubbing fronts (didn't measure) but the running boards in the 3rd position just touch the side lugs in the rear so you might have an issue there.
Thank you, and what kind of tires are those and how do you like them?

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

Posted
7 minutes ago, Ianwelch001 said:

Thank you, and what kind of tires are those and how do you like them?

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
 

NITTO Ridge Grappler.  Significantly better than the stock garbage which did nothing but spin on wet pavement let alone snow.  I am usually a BFG KO2 fan but they didn't have the size I wanted and so far I like these better than the KO2s.  I would recommend them.

Posted
On 11/14/2019 at 9:11 PM, wurgs said:

Will 285/55/22 Nitto TGs fit on a stock Denali with out rubbing or trimming? I read through all the threads and not sure if the people running these all did a level or not. I want to keep as is for now except to replace the horrible stock tires.

Thanks.

You will need a level to fit those. Even with the level it scrubs ever so slightly at full lock and when the suspension compresses. 285/50/22 will fit. Less sidewall though. 

Posted

Thanks for the replies guys. Now to decide which tire to go with.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Those are E rated LT tires vs P,  62 lbs vs 41lbs stock. How was the ride impacted? What psi are you using? Any drop in mpg? How is the stability at highway speeds? I am loving the idea but afraid of the consequences.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I went ahead and got the Terra Grappler G2s in 285/50/22. They are a huge improvement in snow and on icy roads than the stock crap, and look a lot better also. There is no rubbing but does only have about 1/8" clearance when turned all the way. I'm very happy with them so far.  

  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/26/2019 at 8:45 PM, wurgs said:

I went ahead and got the Terra Grappler G2s in 285/50/22. They are a huge improvement in snow and on icy roads than the stock crap, and look a lot better also. There is no rubbing but does only have about 1/8" clearance when turned all the way. I'm very happy with them so far.  

Post some pics! I'm on the same boat as you were before you upgraded your tires. Thanks! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,263 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...